TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- New E60 BMW M5
Pages (4): « 1 2 [3] 4 »
the m5 would eat the benz for breakfast.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by DJ Cubano about to do the same thing to my M3...mmm..mm..can't wait to test it out on the highway Got myself a V1 too so I won't get tickets |
do i even need to say anything here... look left.
while i think the new 5 is a little weird looking, the fact that it's got a v10 means it will absolutely kill anything around...byebye e65, rs6, etc. I cant wait to see the hartge version of this bad boy.
basically, M5 = best car ever...the first m5, the '96-'03 model, and the new e60. nuff said.
Amount of cylinders generally means nothing. Look around at the Supra's (IMO overrated but still good cars) the Ford GT, Porsche 911 Turbo, the Hot Rods (8 second passes on street tires with an 8 cylinder)
The fact that it has a V10 really is not important if you are looking for a true HP gain. That just means its heavier. The BMW 850 ci V12, horrible car. These would sell at dealer auctions for dirt cheap because everyone hated working on the engine.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by getfoul Amount of cylinders generally means nothing. Look around at the Supra's (IMO overrated but still good cars) the Ford GT, Porsche 911 Turbo, the Hot Rods (8 second passes on street tires with an 8 cylinder) The fact that it has a V10 really is not important if you are looking for a true HP gain. That just means its heavier. The BMW 850 ci V12, horrible car. These would sell at dealer auctions for dirt cheap because everyone hated working on the engine. |
I always dreamed of taking an M5 and stuffing a McLaren F1 ///M motor into it.
627hp from the factory 6.1L V12 (or 680 hp in the less restricted LM version)

^^^^^^
Current dream car I'de take it over any BMW M series or not.
S65 AMG Read this before you bash the *65 AMG series of Mercedes.
For those of you that don't want to look heres the HP and TQ specs
| quote: |
| Type: Twin-Turbo V12 Displacement: 5980 cc Horsepower: 612 bhp @ ---- rpm Torque: 738 lb-ft @ 2000 rpm |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by getfoul Amount of cylinders generally means nothing. Look around at the Supra's (IMO overrated but still good cars) the Ford GT, Porsche 911 Turbo, the Hot Rods (8 second passes on street tires with an 8 cylinder) The fact that it has a V10 really is not important if you are looking for a true HP gain. That just means its heavier. The BMW 850 ci V12, horrible car. These would sell at dealer auctions for dirt cheap because everyone hated working on the engine. |

getfoul,
also i heard that mercedes had to take a transmission from their truck division to handle the cl65/s65... those are monsters... just enough horsepower and displacement to get you from gas station to gas station. 
-keith
| quote: |
| Originally posted by keithos27 the m5 with it's v10 will be naturally aspirated. it's going to be a beast just like the current model, and the models before it. ![]() -keith |
Do you realize how retarded this all sounds? The whole point was just to show the new M5 not about how Mclarens or Ferraris or Mercedes are faster... Not arguing over some mythological car that one in this board will ever own.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by BadBadNeil Do you realize how retarded this all sounds? The whole point was just to show the new M5 not about how Mclarens or Ferraris or Mercedes are faster... Not arguing over some mythological car that one in this board will ever own. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by nate735 Naturally asprated engines are great. I have an E46 m3 and the engine is amazing. So much power at any rpm with no lag. M engines are great. |
Updated pics on page 1, check them out!!
btw, an excellent m5 resource is www.m5board.com/vbulletin
-keith
| quote: |
| Originally posted by keithos27 btw, an excellent m5 resource is www.m5board.com/vbulletin -keith |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by nate735 Thats where the pics came from. Great site. |

will do. when is the next ny gathering ?

Bah! I prefer the previous M5. Don't like this one at all...
| quote: |
| Originally posted by nate735 will do. when is the next ny gathering ? |
there is a Chrysler supercar prototype with an AMG V12 Quad-Turbo 850 horsepower engine that does 0-60 in 2.9 seconds ...
its called Chrysler ME Four-Twelve

it hits that 60mph in first gear 
| quote: |
| Originally posted by vasyachkin its called Chrysler ME Four-Twelve ![]() it hits that 60mph in first gear |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Laszlo Bah! I prefer the previous M5. Don't like this one at all... |

The new M5 looks fucking great!
Damn I'd love to get one 
The old M1 looking sweet aswell
As for Chrysler ME Four-Twelve which has such a stupid name (If I remeber right its Multi Engine 4Turbo 12Cylinders) , in the newspaper it looked too techy and less stylish but here it looks abit better
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.