TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Polls - Music Related
-- Non EDM - Red Hot Chilli Peppers vs Oasis
Pages (5): « 1 2 [3] 4 5 »


Posted by Ian on Jul-23-2004 18:16:

quote:
Originally posted by Coup
er dont think so matey.

its not over until the fat lady sings, and as ur mum isnt around, tuff shit


she's home from work in 15 minutes


Posted by Furel on Jul-30-2004 20:06:

Oasis is one of the worst bands ever in my opinion. All their songs sounds as if they come from the same album and they all sound like "Wonderwall"


Posted by DjSimonB on Jul-30-2004 23:47:

I love RHCP, they're my favourite non-trance act. Not been lucky enough to see them live but they make great music. Although I didn't think Universally Speaking and Can't Stop were the best singles, in fact they were IMO the worst tracks off the album.

Oasis aren't bad either, What's The Story (Morning Glory) is a great album, but it's gotta be RHCP for me, every member is so talented at what they do, and they sound truly original


Posted by Tangil on Aug-06-2004 12:33:

quote:
Originally posted by Furel
Oasis is one of the worst bands ever in my opinion. All their songs sounds as if they come from the same album and they all sound like "Wonderwall"


I really wish some of you people would actually get a clue before making sweeping generalisations like this.

I cant believe Oasis are even being compared to RHCP...
Oasis are phenomenal!

Just wait until the end of the year when they release their new album...

If we merged the best songs from both bands onto a top 50 list, no RHCP songs would be in the top 10. Seriously.

Oasis have talent, variation, charisma. RHCP are dull and depressing.

IF ANYONE EVER HAS THE OPPORTUNITY, SEE OASIS LIVE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

THEY ARE F***ING UNBELIEVABLE

- just an opinion, thats all

PS: for the record, the best Oasis album is "The Masterplan".


Posted by Coup on Aug-08-2004 08:46:

quote:
Originally posted by lachieslats
I really wish some of you people would actually get a clue before making sweeping generalisations like this.

I cant believe Oasis are even being compared to RHCP...
Oasis are phenomenal!

Just wait until the end of the year when they release their new album...

If we merged the best songs from both bands onto a top 50 list, no RHCP songs would be in the top 10. Seriously.

Oasis have talent, variation, charisma. RHCP are dull and depressing.

IF ANYONE EVER HAS THE OPPORTUNITY, SEE OASIS LIVE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

THEY ARE F***ING UNBELIEVABLE

- just an opinion, thats all

PS: for the record, the best Oasis album is "The Masterplan".

werd.


Posted by XeQtOr on Aug-09-2004 07:35:

RHCP are like the best rock band out there at the moment.. Had an opportunity to see them live about a year ago and they fucking rocked.. Fleas bass playing is just fucking immense.. Just listen to RCHP - Live in Hyde Park album before you judge them in any way.. IMO oasis are just plain BORING..


Posted by Coup on Aug-09-2004 17:48:

quote:
Originally posted by XeQtOr
IMO oasis are just plain BORING..

how, the, fuck, are they boring?


Posted by dchaves on Aug-10-2004 09:36:

Oasis must win this poll, their music is much better. RHCP did "Give it away" and no other good song.

It's been ages since the last time I listen to Oasis, I must search trough my old cds...


Posted by Ian on Aug-10-2004 10:05:

quote:
Originally posted by Coup
how, the, fuck, are they boring?


every song is just liam whining on & on in an awful manner


Posted by Coup on Aug-10-2004 21:24:

no.


Posted by Ian on Aug-10-2004 22:48:

yes


Posted by FCB_Fanatic on Aug-12-2004 01:26:

actually, I don't like them both.
Although I like other music than EDM, this is not something I would often listen to.
but I voted for RHCP, I 'hate' their music less than Oasis


Posted by Tangil on Aug-12-2004 09:02:

quote:
Originally posted by Ian^
yes


What about the songs that Noel sings?
What about all of Noel's acoustics?
Liam is fuken good anyway


Posted by Ian on Aug-12-2004 10:11:

quote:
Originally posted by lachieslats
What about the songs that Noel sings?
What about all of Noel's acoustics?
Liam is fuken good anyway


I find one or two of their songs listenable if its on radio or whatever, but I think they're awfully overrated and nowhere near the class of RHCP


Posted by Tangil on Aug-12-2004 11:42:

quote:
Originally posted by Ian^
I find one or two of their songs listenable if its on radio or whatever, but I think they're awfully overrated and nowhere near the class of RHCP


so because they aren't as mainstream as RHCP they are worse?

How about you listen to their stuff that didn't make it to radio and then make judgement, you will see how much they destroy RHCP!


Posted by Ian on Aug-12-2004 12:28:

quote:
Originally posted by lachieslats
so because they aren't as mainstream as RHCP they are worse?

How about you listen to their stuff that didn't make it to radio and then make judgement, you will see how much they destroy RHCP!


I never said that at all. If you knew the path I've taken with music over the last 10 years you'd not be able to say it. I'm saying that the voices for one are overbearing and tuneless, if you want a good lead singer RHCP are better or Muse the best imho of that, being able to do different types of songs, the banging ones like Can't Stop, the more ballad type like universally speaking or under the bridge, and the plain genius like californication & by the way. Oasis have done 1 or 2 ok songs, but even those don't come close to any rhcp song imo, there's a lot of good bands over the years, Blur imo were better than Oasis, Muse are, RHCP, Foo Fighters, REM, Nirvana etc and all of those wipe their ass with Oasis


Posted by Ian on Aug-12-2004 12:29:

quote:
Originally posted by lachieslats
so because they aren't as mainstream as RHCP they are worse?


actually to fully explain this one..

If I'm listening to radio & an oasis song comes on, I will listen as a rule, but I would not pick up a cd and willingly choose them as I believe that like I said above there are so many better bands out there. It has nothing to do with commercialism, Oasis have had their fair share of radio plays also.


Posted by Tangil on Aug-12-2004 13:05:

quote:
Originally posted by Ian^
I never said that at all. If you knew the path I've taken with music over the last 10 years you'd not be able to say it. I'm saying that the voices for one are overbearing and tuneless, if you want a good lead singer RHCP are better or Muse the best imho of that, being able to do different types of songs, the banging ones like Can't Stop, the more ballad type like universally speaking or under the bridge, and the plain genius like californication & by the way. Oasis have done 1 or 2 ok songs, but even those don't come close to any rhcp song imo, there's a lot of good bands over the years, Blur imo were better than Oasis, Muse are, RHCP, Foo Fighters, REM, Nirvana etc and all of those wipe their ass with Oasis


"being able to do different types of songs" ?

OASIS have so much VARIETY its incredible!
I'm not joking, but if you think that RHCP have more variety than Oasis it would not be a matter of opinion - you would just be wrong.
Not only has their style changed many times over their career, but on each album their songs are extremely varied!
- rock anthems
- ballads
- melancholic
- uplifting
- relaxed
- heavy
- etc.

Need i say more?


Posted by Ian on Aug-12-2004 14:18:

again that comes down to your opinion that they can make such types of songs, they had a chance to be bigger than they were, and every time the personal lives of the gallagher brothers & their behaviour let them down, leaving them virtually unknown to some people still. The idea of the poll was who people thought are the better band, and the people have voted so far, even though it's close, as many people agree with me as with you.


Posted by Tangil on Aug-13-2004 07:10:

yeah well if anyone had actually been bothered to listen their songs they would see that they do actually have massive variety. My point is that many people on this poll are voting against a band that they know very little about.

PS: Noel Gallagher is a hero, Oasis rule!!

PPS: What is your opinion on Supergrass?


Posted by SYSTEM-J on Aug-16-2004 16:37:

1. Oasis are much more of a mainstream band than RHCP, being Brit-pop. They've also had about five or six number ones, and one of the best-selling singles ever. Go figure.

2. RHCP have much better musicians- Flea is one of the best bassists ever, and John Frusciante is a talented guitarist.

3. RHCP are a lot more original, with their indie/funk/hip-hop blend, while Oasis don't do anything original at all.


Posted by Lew.D on Aug-17-2004 12:43:

chilly willy's!
loved them in the californication days


Posted by Coup on Aug-17-2004 19:15:

quote:
Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
Oasis don't do anything original at all.

what a load of absolute bollocks. Wonderwall has become a total classic, u dont get classics if theyre not original.


Posted by SYSTEM-J on Aug-18-2004 17:31:

quote:
Originally posted by Coup
what a load of absolute bollocks. Wonderwall has become a total classic, u dont get classics if theyre not original.


A totally classic pop song... don't be such a fanboy. Wonderwall is catchy and your mum likes it, that's why it sold so many, and that's why it's a classic. Nothing more, nothing less.


Posted by zshev on Aug-20-2004 10:49:

gotta be the Chili's


Pages (5): « 1 2 [3] 4 5 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.