TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- busted indeed....
Pages (9): « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 »
| quote: |
| Originally posted by sisterbliss like he said, it hurts his release reputation it's his work and he should be able to have control over it. if he hasn't released it yet he has the right to be mad at someone for using his work without permission. i'm sure if you were in max's shoes you'd be saying the same thing he is |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Laushinameee As far as the artist is concerned, and you can see it from the horses mouth here, he is concerned with HIS work. I dont think max graham gives two shits about this other guys career. He is bothered that a track which he hasnt released has been 'released' on the internet. The reasons for concern have also been outlined by him, for example he may not have totally finished working on the track, and its not ready for release in the state that its in. the means by which people come across the track is of no concern. Its the fact that people have them in the first place. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Laushinameee I just think someone should actually point out why its so bad that this happens to max graham? anyone with even one mp3 on their computer need not attempt an answer. you ALL have mp3's on your computer, the only difference is that you dont spread it around. You still have them though, and this is what the artist is actually concerned about. So you shouldnt come on saying 'omg thats so bad' when youre sitting on a pc with a shitload of mp3 on it |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Laushinameee I just think it should be noted that all these people who are saying omg max thats sooo bad all have about 100000 mp3 on their computer. What makes it so bad that its a max graham track, just the fact that he came on complaining? There is so much hypocrisy here. |
I should of put money on it, i knew some fuckin half wit would start the whole 'It's the producers at blame' line.
Guys this isn't about standards of users on here.
This is about a producer whose music is out there and some guy is using the producers hard work (which he hasnt paid to legitmately use) to promote himself.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by idoru Not to keep the flamewar going, but there's a difference between listening to sets and set-rips on your own personal computer, and throwing reconstructions into a mix and claiming that it's on vinyl and that you're an actual DJ. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Frase I should of put money on it, i knew some fuckin half wit would start the whole 'It's the producers at blame' line. Guys this isn't about standards of users on here. This is about a producer whose music is out there and some guy is using the producers hard work (which he hasnt paid to legitmately use) to promote himself. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Frase I should of put money on it, i knew some fuckin half wit would start the whole 'It's the producers at blame' line. |
thats the point
shit happens all the time you just have to deal with it
im sure the kids starving in rwanda arent very happy about the fact theyre starving are they?
its not ethical to use it in a mix, and the guy is a retard for doing so
but its 2004, things like this happen all the time
you dont see pvd moaning about all the reconstructions and bootlegs of his tunes that are made? if anything it provides free advertising
and suddenly this max graham tune that was hitherto not spoken about gets mentioned by everyone. you couldnt get better advertising if you tried
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Laushinameee Ive not blamed the producer at all. In fact ive consistently said how there is probably nothing the producer can do to stop this kind of thing from happening. Im just amused by people saying how bad it is when they are all guilty of having mp3 on their pc. |
I still fail to see how someone having a track on their PC is the same as putting it into a mix...acting like it was a purchased vinyl...and then postwhoring it all over TA in order to self promote.
I'm not open for debate on this, Laushinameee, because the basis for your debate falls on deaf ears.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Frase Your quick to right everyone off arent you. I have about 30-40 mp3's on my pc. However these are legitimately purchased from legal download sites or come straight from the producer direct. The only form of what could be classed as illegal is mix sets. But i dont see them as bad as such as your not having the full track (i dont really need a full track to tell me if i like it or not) I don't agree with downloading illegal mp3's either hence why all the mp3's i have are legitimate. But lets point it out bright spark, its not the file format its the legitimacy of the content on that file |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by trancebrat I still fail to see how someone having a track on their PC is the same as putting it into a mix...acting like it was a purchased vinyl...and then postwhoring it all over TA in order to self promote. I'm not open for debate on this, Laushinameee, because the basis for your debate falls on deaf ears. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Laushinameee yes of course, but you would never in a million years say to me that you are in the majority on this issue. You know for a fact that 99% of TA users download illegal music and will contine to do so, even after saying how bad it is in this thread. The guy was a spastic for using the tracks like that, i agree 100% and he deserves pretty much anything he gets just for being stupid, but I dont think what is necessary is a load of people so keen to run around spouting about how anti illegal music they are and how its such a bad thing.... maybe its to look good in front of the artist |
Re: grrr
| quote: |
| Originally posted by max graham http://www.tranceaddict.com/forums/...%22#post3301645 not all gotten yet... |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Laushinameee the artist is concerned with people having an illegal copy. Whether this be just sitting on your pc for your own 'private' use, on a file share device or on a 'set' is of little difference to the artist. |
Laushinameee
give it up already. who gives a fuck. the links have already been removed and what not. just leave it alone.
this thread turned from, hey guys just to let you know, this guy used my songs from a set to promote himself
into this:

| quote: |
| Originally posted by Laushinameee the artist is concerned with people having an illegal copy. Whether this be just sitting on your pc for your own 'private' use, on a file share device or on a 'set' is of little difference to the artist. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by idoru So you can't respect Max's opinion, but have to flame him for having just that; his personal opinion on what's being done with his own track? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by trancebrat I don't have a copy of this track and if I did it would ONLY be because Max sent it to me himself. Thank you very much. I have far too much respect for the man than to download his music and then spam it everywhere on the internet. Please quit assuming that you know everything when you have no idea. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Laushinameee ''this ****** is now offering to download for anyone else who wants it'' the artist is concerned with people owning the track 'illegally', not so much what they do with it ^ |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Laushinameee ''this ****** is now offering to download for anyone else who wants it'' the artist is concerned with people owning the track 'illegally', not so much what they do with it ^ |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by max graham you know its not even the money...our whole career is based on us putting out good records...if a record comes out wrong or isnt promoted right we lose that opportunity, people ripping it and putting it on the net causes that to happen...i have played this in sets that have been made public...i guess i was too optimistic to think people would rip it out of the set... mg |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Laushinameee i wonder why the RIAA get so fucking worked up ... i mean, once there is any sort of controversy brought up all of a sudden no one touches illegal music |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Laushinameee the artist is concerned with people having an illegal copy. Whether this be just sitting on your pc for your own 'private' use, on a file share device or on a 'set' is of little difference to the artist. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Frase How tight is that belt around your arm? Stay off the fuckin drugs sunshine |
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.