TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- USA own North Korea
Pages (3): « 1 2 [3]


Posted by Petrogad on Dec-17-2004 18:08:

i don know, droppin in booze still might do the trick...


Posted by Lebezniatnikov on Dec-17-2004 18:24:

Worked against the Native Americans


Posted by Petrogad on Dec-29-2004 00:30:

so did killing buffalos, lets just do that. (i think kill buffalos was slang for something)


Posted by Sevas Stra on Dec-29-2004 01:03:

we get NK drunk, one commie moron trips and falls on the "launch" button---> We are fucked :P


Posted by Petrogad on Dec-29-2004 01:55:

so north korea turns into a suicide bomber?


Posted by smokeape on Dec-29-2004 02:42:

quote:
Originally posted by zig
Just a little bit arrogent...just a tiny wincey wincey bit arrogent...nice thread though...enjoy the flak


Uh yeah. Most arrogant fools don't understand that hitting the nK and sK locomotives together will cause a few million civilian deaths on top of the few thousand military deaths. Casualties of modern warfare with the expenditure of weapons of ever increasing lethality on the peninsula will exceed anything seen in previous wars to date.


[[[smoke]]]


Posted by smokeape on Dec-29-2004 02:58:

quote:
Originally posted by Nou
Hence why I want war there the most of all, it will really show the US what a fucking real war is. All these little pussies that think 20 killed in mess tent is a horrible day, or a horrible month for US casualties then they will have another thing coming when you got 20guys dying every hour.

Think about it, we havnt had a massive scale war since Vietnam, and even that wasnt that bad. I think we need another big war to teach some of these neocons what war is actually like.


Come one Korea, teach us a lesson!


Oh no, we won't take a sustained 20 dead per hour or even per day. nK would suffer the horrific blows from a real superpower in destroying their war machine real quick if the casualties approached that level. The problem in ultimately destroying their Army and ability to fight, just like the problem in the first Iraqi war in Kuwait is why should we slaughter their military personnel wholesale when they are just following orders. Militaries tend to respect one another just like in football and don't want to run up the score on a vanquished opponent.


[[[smoke]]]


Posted by Petrogad on Dec-29-2004 05:08:

quote:
Originally posted by smokeape
Militaries tend to respect one another just like in football and don't want to run up the score on a vanquished opponent.


man when im playing my friend in donkey kong racing for nintendo 64 or playing my other buddy in madden 2004 for xbox, i try and slauter that bitch just to make him feel bad, and so i can brag about it to his parents. Dont you think GW would be similar? going and talkin to britian and being like snap check what 3rd world country i just fd up, its your move Tony Blair....

:-D


Posted by Petrogad on Dec-29-2004 14:28:

quote:
Originally posted by Slylee
i heard that the chances of north korea supplying nuclear warfare to terrorists is very high...and that they would be shipped right into the port of L.A. or *could* be shipped rather. it kind of disturbed me. but then i called my dad for comfort (he works for Lockheed) and he said they are working on a contract for those x-ray machines to look through all the boxcars...and that we have satellites that are able to pick that stuff up and we'd know if any was being moved.

then i watched Michael Moore's "Bowling for Columbine" for the first time last week in my sociology class and now i realize just how scared we amercans are about everything...it's the damn news!


Media over evulates everything way to much and michael moore needs to be deported from the united states, maybe we can send him to north korea to do some "undercover work" and then he can make another brilliant film "North Korea - Terrorists at work" or some propeganda bs that hes good at.

cheers


Posted by razmataz on Dec-29-2004 15:30:

quote:
Originally posted by Petrogad
Media over evulates everything way to much and michael moore needs to be deported from the united states, maybe we can send him to north korea to do some "undercover work" and then he can make another brilliant film "North Korea - Terrorists at work" or some propeganda bs that hes good at.

cheers


The ironic thing about Michael Moore bashers is that they cannot really refute any of the claims he makes in his books/films. Just sidestepping the issues and bashing Michael Moore seems to be the most clever retaliatory strategy.

I say more power to him. For as long as you have your O'Rileys and Limbaughs, you need an outspoken lefty to even things out a bit.


Posted by Petrogad on Dec-29-2004 22:09:

i poop on moore's head hes concerned about one thing its called money.


Posted by Krypton on Dec-29-2004 22:19:

quote:
Originally posted by Nou
Im talking about a nK first strike, 48 hour rocket artillery barrage... not much gunna make it outa that, after that tho nK will def get a massive blow... but still our "peacekeeping" forces on the DMZ would be massively overwhelmed in the first few days after the ballon goes up.


a rocket barrage will mean nothing if they have underground bunkers and trenches to take cover in. just like in world war II. the battle of monte casino in italy. it took the allies monthes to capture one hillside monastary turned fortified position even after massive pummelings by the allied bombers. the bombers actually helped the germans by destroying the building so they could use the rubble as cover.


Posted by razmataz on Dec-29-2004 22:22:

quote:
Originally posted by Petrogad
i poop on moore's head hes concerned about one thing its called money.


lol, who isn't concerned about mulla? Apart from Mother Teresa. Certainly not any of the people Moore bashes mind you.

Thats the typical response I get btw. People seem to hate him not because anything he says is untrue or that he is a liar but because he is "greedy" or "fat" or "ugly". Childlike deflection from the issues at hand.


Posted by Petrogad on Jan-03-2005 17:20:

the way hes going about doing it is 100% wrong, its using the horrific events in American history (911, colimbine) then drafting some "theory" and using a little bad acting he proclaims he has found the REASONS why when really he doesnt care he just wants to collect off people's deaths. Hes like an ambulance chaser.


Posted by smokeape on Jan-05-2005 02:20:

Damn, kill this thread. nK striking out at anyone will end up with their quick demise, then we're stuck with troops in the country trying to bring the people out of the 1950's...

Are we ever going to have Mods?


[[[smoke]]]


Posted by smokeape on Jan-05-2005 04:46:

Count me in on that action as well, but most folks don't realize sK has about 20,000 MLRS pods on the Han, which means they can fire nonstop for about a month down the avenues of approach and anything approaching a sizeable force moving down south. Actually within a few days, the US would have so much airpower raining death and destruction down upon nK forces, it would become almost inhumane. Precision and area munitions taking down miltary forces wholesale becomes butchery unless we take the head command and control elements out of the equation to give enemy forces the chance to surrender. nK is a second rate force which would be massacred in any scenario with the US, and the only thing keeping them alive at the moment is the fact that they're staying on their side of the border.


[[[smoke]]]


Pages (3): « 1 2 [3]

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.