What's wrong with Ferry??? - TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- What's wrong with Ferry???
Pages (3): « 1 2 [3]

Posted by 303 on Dec-21-2004 17:27:

at least his still huge in japan, they simply love him over there

Posted by Radagast on Dec-21-2004 17:29:

You have not taken one crucial factor into consideration: i've tired of repeating myself. I've said more than once what I consider classic trance to be and who I believe are its pioneers. Short of putting them in my signature by copying my "favorite dj/producer" list in my profile, I won't recite them every time I have a point to make.

Posted by SYSTEM-J on Dec-21-2004 17:34:

quote:
Originally posted by Radagast
You have not taken one crucial factor into consideration: i've tired of repeating myself. I've said more than once what I consider classic trance to be and who I believe are its pioneers. Short of putting them in my signature by copying my "favorite dj/producer" list in my profile, I won't recite them every time I have a point to make.

Then why make the point? It's pure rhetoric if you aren't going to raise a discussion.

Posted by Radagast on Dec-21-2004 17:42:

My definition of classic trance is in this thread and who I would place in Ferry's position as a pioneer is irrelevant. My point stands.

Posted by SYSTEM-J on Dec-21-2004 17:44:

quote:
Originally posted by Radagast
My definition of classic trance is in this thread and who I would place in Ferry's position as a pioneer is irrelevant. My point stands.

My point that you were debasing his post stands. Your point only reinforces that.

Posted by Radagast on Dec-21-2004 17:48:

Simply stating a fact does not mean i'm debasing someone's post.

Posted by SYSTEM-J on Dec-21-2004 17:52:

quote:
Originally posted by Radagast
Simply stating a fact does not mean i'm debasing someone's post.

Hmm. Read this again:

quote:
You debased his notion that Ferry is a classical trance pioneer, in usual abrupt style. If you want to argue the semantics, you debased it because you just made a simple statement highlighting his error. You didn't offer a reason of why you thought he was wrong, or an example of what you consider correct.

Posted by Radagast on Dec-21-2004 17:59:

I didn't debase his post, I invalidated it. Inaomuch as telling someone who says 1 + 1 = 3 that 1 + 1 = 2 is invalidating a false belief.

Posted by SYSTEM-J on Dec-21-2004 18:23:

quote:
Originally posted by Radagast
I didn't debase his post, I invalidated it. Inaomuch as telling someone who says 1 + 1 = 3 that 1 + 1 = 2 is invalidating a false belief.

You also corrected it, replied to it, addressed it, made a reference to it... You did many things to his post, and you debased it.

Pages (3): « 1 2 [3]