TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Australia
-- Chris Fortier :: Balance 007
Pages (3): « 1 2 [3]


Posted by luke.sykes on Apr-18-2005 01:34:

yeah was a wicked night, great music, unfortunatly had to split early as i had work in the morning, but ill def be out to more of those styled events.


Posted by JayKuE on Apr-18-2005 02:40:

that was fun. thanking the TA lads for the time!

As for Fortier, I actually enjoyed how he emerged with a few funky tunes. Far from the hand-baggy i thought. Subtle vocals with back-stage like grooves. I've yet to listen to his balance release, but I'm sure the set was an intimate in-depth elaboration, of his experimental, but strong views on the direction of progressive music - "What the fuck is progressive?"

Such an array, such an arsenal. So many tunes, so many funny feelings. I rode on beams of light with climatic build-ups, and leaped out from boxes "jack" jumped from with cheeky analog melodies. I felt vibrations, grooved with minimalastic basslines, perspired beads of sweat, and shared moments with like-minded souls. I cant say I dug the upbeat meaty tech 3-3.5 hours in though, twas just not me

And SQ-K, that remix was Jacques Lu Cont's Thin White Duke remix. I heard it on the radio on the trip back home. Needless to say, an hr later, i secured a copy online.

so much fucking fun, Infusion, I think I'll come!
though i hear gav keitel mixes like a one-armed ass jockey. true?


Posted by j�c� on Apr-18-2005 08:00:

i wasnt too impressed with his set. he played some cool tracks but overall I found him to be a bit flat and a tad boring

he just didnt do it for me


Posted by Renegade on Apr-18-2005 13:49:

quote:
Originally posted by JayKuE
so much fucking fun, Infusion, I think I'll come!
though i hear gav keitel mixes like a one-armed ass jockey. true?


Haha, now you've done it...

See you there, man!

quote:
Originally posted by j�c�
i wasnt too impressed with his set. he played some cool tracks but overall I found him to be a bit flat and a tad boring

he just didnt do it for me


I'm starting to get the feeling he played a different sort of set up in Sydney. I could understand if someone thought the sort of set he played in Melbourne was a bit repetitive or something, but the word "flat" could not have been used to describe it. Apart from the first half an hour or so, he was banging it out constantly for the entire four hours. Showcased a wide range of genres too, but they all mixed together perfectly.

Loved it.


Posted by tathi on Apr-18-2005 21:03:

quote:
Originally posted by Renegade
I'm starting to get the feeling he played a different sort of set up in Sydney. I could understand if someone thought the sort of set he played in Melbourne was a bit repetitive or something, but the word "flat" could not have been used to describe it. Apart from the first half an hour or so, he was banging it out constantly for the entire four hours. Showcased a wide range of genres too, but they all mixed together perfectly.

there is no way it was flat (imo), he said the only difference was he didn't play as hard in sydney and we missed an hour


Posted by tonydanza on Apr-19-2005 00:00:

flat is probably the worst possible description .. everytime you would go to take a slash or grab a beer, you'd come back and it'd be a totally different sound to when you left.


Posted by j�c� on Apr-19-2005 05:00:

when i mean flat i mean a lot of the tracks he played were very monotonous.. they didn't go anywhere (for me)

id heard great things about fortier, maybe i was just expecting a bit more. also i was still recovering from the night before so maybe that added to the flat vibe i was getting


Posted by Slade on Apr-19-2005 05:11:

This mix is so impressive. Especially cd2.


Pages (3): « 1 2 [3]

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.