TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- Good techno, as opposed to boring, bad, repetative techno
Pages (3): « 1 2 [3]


Posted by sandstorm03 on Apr-29-2005 17:35:

quote:
Originally posted by Aiwendil
1. hard acid trance = acid trance
2. i doubt you can tell the difference between acid techno and acid trance.
3. he didn't work on drax? what are you talking about?




then why are you interested in my competition for techno heads.



Posted by AlphaStarred on Apr-29-2005 18:27:

quote:
Originally posted by Aiwendil
1. hard acid trance = acid trance
2. i doubt you can tell the difference between acid techno and acid trance.
3. he didn't work on drax? what are you talking about?


I can very well tell the difference, and hard acid trance does not tantamount to acid trance...that's fucking ludicrous. Thanks for delineating your ignorance. As for "working on" i meant that he wasn't the only one producing it, meaning it was a joint project. If it was something from Drax, i would have simply said something along the lines of, Thomas P. Heckmann has done, not "worked on."

quote:

then why are you interested in my competition for techno heads.


good question.


Posted by Blue. on Apr-29-2005 18:37:

quote:
Originally posted by Kinuvan
you clearly do not understand techno. It's not about individual tunes, it's about the mix. Trance djs cannot play 3 tracks at a time even if they wanted to, good techno djs can do 4, and the best ones have 3 in near enough all the time.

Techno isn't really more repetitive than other forms of EDM, but it is a lot more subtle and if you're used to big riffs and breakdowns then it's gonna take you a while to get it.


What a great way to rationalize someone elses opinion, they must just not understand it. I don't want to "understand it" because a lot of it sounds the same and is shitty. I don't listen to much trance so I could care less if trance DJs can't do it.

What the fuck do I care if a DJ can mix two tracks at the same time or 100 tracks at the same time? If the tunes suck balls it's not like 1 shitty track plus another 2 shitty tracks = OMG WOW ASOT!


Posted by AlphaStarred on Apr-29-2005 18:47:

quote:
Originally posted by Aiwendil
so hard acid trance is not acid trance. and i guess acid trance is not trance either. i call acid trance bangin' deep house, because i'm a moron.


acid trance is surely trance, just as hard acid trance is likewise trance. But the notion is that many acid trance productions won't sound remotely close to hard acid trance productions. Just like Drax's productions you mentioned sound nothing like his acid trance production i'm deeming of, and if the former were the case, then i'm convinced you know i would have simply said "hard acid trance."

In any case, enough of this preposterous discourse. If you had heard the track i'm entertaining, you'd surely agree with me.


Posted by AlphaStarred on Apr-29-2005 18:55:

well i should think we were doing both...but whatever...
ultimately, who really gives a shit, right? heh...


Posted by hardstyle on Apr-29-2005 19:22:

ok

quote:
Originally posted by AlphaStarred
answer?! you can't stump me when i couldn't care less for Liebing. You may just as well keep it to yourself then and keep listening to his stuff.

here's a question for the trance head: name one of the best acid trance tunes that Thomas P. Heckmann has worked on and don't say Amphetamine.

you have 1 minute, otherwise it's quite lucid that you're taking recourse to discogs.

edit: looks like the trance head is mired.


Sorry son you are retarded, you telling me techno is repetetive when you dont even give a chance for techno?

For me trance is more repetative then techno


Posted by AlphaStarred on Apr-29-2005 19:35:

Re: ok

quote:
Originally posted by hardstyle
Sorry son you are retarded, you telling me techno is repetetive when you dont even give a chance for techno?

For me trance is more repetative then techno


umm...............................................WTF?!!?!?!?!?!?!?!??!?!!!?

please go to bed or something, or off with you to the CORe!


Posted by ARNATINE on Apr-29-2005 20:19:

quote:
Originally posted by AlphaStarred
Danilo Vigorito - Rephlex


+1


Posted by hardstyle on Apr-30-2005 05:49:

Re: Re: ok

quote:
Originally posted by AlphaStarred
umm...............................................WTF?!!?!?!?!?!?!?!??!?!!!?

please go to bed or something, or off with you to the CORe!


Are you mad becouse i find trance more boring then techno?


Posted by Ghostface on Apr-30-2005 11:00:

Try some stuff on Tronic, Pornographic or Recycled Loops if you like tech-trance. For artists try Kanzyani, Vigorito and Bailey.


Posted by AlphaStarred on Apr-30-2005 16:15:

Re: Re: Re: ok

quote:
Originally posted by hardstyle
Are you mad becouse i find trance more boring then techno?


if you'd been paying the slightest attention, you'd realize at length that i prefer techno over trance and reserve your moronic comments.


Posted by Blue. on Sep-30-2005 21:29:

I.... Need...... More...... Techno......

So along with the original examples let me add more of the kind of tracks I like:

Picotto - Dark Room
Marco Bailey and Redhead - Wasabi
nick_beat-technodisco_2005_(pascal_feos_rmx)
sunglasses at night (chris liebing mix)


Posted by Mike_Foyle on Oct-01-2005 00:07:

quote:
Originally posted by Blue.
by repetative i mean a 5 minute buildup, followed by a minor change in the song and back to the same 5 minute buildup


more to the point, can you name a techno track that fits this description? hehe


Posted by PlasticSoul on Oct-01-2005 00:13:

quote:
Originally posted by Mike_Foyle
more to the point, can you name a techno track that fits this description? hehe


maybe he's being ironical...
but there are lots of trance like that... maybe markus schulz'?

note: im serious.


Pages (3): « 1 2 [3]

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.