TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- U.S.-Israel Alliance
Pages (3): « 1 2 [3]


Posted by George Smiley on Aug-25-2005 17:51:

quote:
Originally posted by Yoepus
I wouldn't say "extremly different threat", but "slightly different threat". Also Al-Q has aided the Palestinians and Hezbullah on numerous occasions.

Do you have any links as I am not aware of any?

quote:
How so?

I think it is very similar to the alliance between those countries. The USA trains, equips, and fights with all those allies and has good economic terms.

Yes well you would thini its a similar alliance wouldn't you?!

I don't think the US particularly needs to train any of those countries (including Israel) if anything I would have thought it more likely to be the other way round (esp re UK and Israel) Training excersises maybe, but thats not training. Also it does not "arm" those countries it sells weapons to them which is completely different. And ont "fights with" Completely true, for everyone but Israel! Or is that the other way round? Maybe America's Middle Eastern adventures are for Israel's benefits? After all, Saddam was no threat to the West. There is no way he was gonna sell weapons to a group whose primary aim was the overthrow of Middle Eastern governments, so where would those WMDs be targeted at? Hmmmm....

So, to put it another way - does Israel fight for America like the UK or Denmark or France fight for America? No

quote:
The only different I see is A) Israel is the only USA allie at constant war and B) compared the above mentioned states the USA and Israel share a free-trade pact. (So it would be more similar to the USA alliances with Singapore, Austrilia, and UK)

Israel is "technically" at war with Syria. If you're talking about being at war with terrorists, then so were the UK, but did America send us billions in aid? Did they fuck! They sent money to the fucking terrorists!!!

And I'm not sure that the UK has a free-trade pact with the US as the EU negotiates anything to do with trade for the UK


Posted by Yoepus on Aug-25-2005 18:22:

quote:
Originally posted by George Smiley
Do you have any links as I am not aware of any?


Most likely.


quote:

I don't think the US particularly needs to train any of those countries (including Israel) if anything I would have thought it more likely to be the other way round (esp re UK and Israel) Training excersises maybe, but thats not training. Also it does not "arm" those countries it sells weapons to them which is completely different.


Yes like I said, trains, and equips its allies. The relationship is mutual, the allies also train and equip the USA. Train, training exercises, same thing.

quote:

And ont "fights with" Completely true, for everyone but Israel! Or is that the other way round? Maybe America's Middle Eastern adventures are for Israel's benefits? After all, Saddam was no threat to the West. There is no way he was gonna sell weapons to a group whose primary aim was the overthrow of Middle Eastern governments, so where would those WMDs be targeted at? Hmmmm....


Yes excatly, Israel is so clever it was able to convience the USA to expend $300+ billion and the lives of thousands of its soldiers just because they were 'scared' of Saddam.

However, USA forces do fight with Israel in the occupied territories and on covert operations in other locations in the world.

They do not participate in the war in Iraq, because unlike Denmark, UK, etc, the USA has not asked them to participate, and Israel realizing that its participation would jeprodize the USA alliance, did not offer this participation. Had the USA asked, I garuntee you Israel would have sent troops or monies.

Right now Israel does provide the USA with a logistics and supply base for the war.


quote:

So, to put it another way - does Israel fight for America like the UK or Denmark or France fight for America? No


The USA relationship with Israel is still young (only really maturing as an alliance in 1973). Regardless, perhaps youc an enlighten me when in recent history the French fought for the USA....

quote:

Israel is "technically" at war with Syria.


Actually its technically at war with some 20+ Arab states.

quote:

If you're talking about being at war with terrorists, then so were the UK, but did America send us billions in aid? Did they fuck! They sent money to the fucking terrorists!!!


The USA is sending Israel aid primarly due to the peace initiative it signed with Egypt and Jordan. The USA gives similar monies to Egypt and Jordan. Also it interjected and gave economic concessions during your own war with the IRA.

But to put it plainly, Israel is recieving USA aid for military and economic development because it, unlike most of its other allies, needs it.

And I'm not sure that the UK has a free-trade pact with the US as the EU negotiates anything to do with trade for the UK [/QUOTE]


Posted by cap on Aug-25-2005 18:53:

quote:
Originally posted by George Smiley
Why would having "top notch" spy agencies mean they would be allied? The KGB were a "top notch" spy agency but they weren't allied with America



I'm not saying that just because two countries have elite spy services that they always form an alliance.

But in this case:

- America needs information from the middle east (source of threat)
- Israel has equivalent intelligence services to the US

Israel is always in a precarious position in terms of international support. This could be for many reasons, including:

- Mossad frequently violates international law to protect Israel (ie. sneaking into France to kill a Canadian scientist who was assissting Iraq with rocket technology).
- Many people across the world either love - or in most cases - hate the notion of a Jewish state.
- The Jews still face anti-semitism from areas of Europe, and still have tenuous relationships with other religious figureheads (eg. the Pope).

Anyways, the point is that America's support can boost Israel into a formidable international position. Thus, Israel and America enter a mutually benefiting alliance.

Alliance is formed.


Posted by George Smiley on Aug-25-2005 18:59:

quote:
Originally posted by Yoepus
Most likely.

I asked cos I am interested!

quote:
Yes excatly, Israel is so clever it was able to convience the USA to expend $300+ billion and the lives of thousands of its soldiers just because they were 'scared' of Saddam.

Or...maybe members of government are rabidly Zionist?

quote:
However, USA forces do fight with Israel in the occupied territories and on covert operations in other locations in the world.

Such as? (And fighting in the occupied territories is hardly Israel fighting for America is it? Its America fighting for Israel)

quote:
They do not participate in the war in Iraq, because unlike Denmark, UK, etc, the USA has not asked them to participate, and Israel realizing that its participation would jeprodize the USA alliance, did not offer this participation. Had the USA asked, I garuntee you Israel would have sent troops or monies.

Right now Israel does provide the USA with a logistics and supply base for the war.

Ok I can perfectly appreciate why Israel does not fight in Iraq, but throughout history, Israel has never helped America out in overt military operations all over the world

quote:
The USA relationship with Israel is still young (only really maturing as an alliance in 1973). Regardless, perhaps youc an enlighten me when in recent history the French fought for the USA....

Er...Iraq (1991), Bosnia, Kosovo, Afghanistan?

quote:
The USA is sending Israel aid primarly due to the peace initiative it signed with Egypt and Jordan. The USA gives similar monies to Egypt and Jordan. Also it interjected and gave economic concessions during your own war with the IRA.

But to put it plainly, Israel is recieving USA aid for military and economic development because it, unlike most of its other allies, needs it.

You wouldn't need it if you got out of the territories!!

Have you any idea how much money is wasted on the settlers? The cost the govt pays for them to live there and the cost of the security? Not to mention to cost of lives in Israel proper as a response. And where is a shit load of that money coming from? And aren't America stumping up half the compensation for the settlers?


Posted by George Smiley on Aug-25-2005 19:01:

quote:
Originally posted by cap
I'm not saying that just because two countries have elite spy services that they always form an alliance.

But in this case:

- America needs information from the middle east (source of threat)
- Israel has equivalent intelligence services to the US

Israel is always in a precarious position in terms of international support. This could be for many reasons, including:

- Mossad frequently violates international law to protect Israel (ie. sneaking into France to kill a Canadian scientist who was assissting Iraq with rocket technology).
- Many people across the world either love - or in most cases - hate the notion of a Jewish state.
- The Jews still face anti-semitism from areas of Europe, and still have tenuous relationships with other religious figureheads (eg. the Pope).

Anyways, the point is that America's support can boost Israel into a formidable international position. Thus, Israel and America enter a mutually benefiting alliance.

Alliance is formed.

So you dont think religion comes into it at all?


Posted by cap on Aug-25-2005 19:33:

quote:
Originally posted by George Smiley
So you dont think religion comes into it at all?


Let's be honest. America is not a very religious country. Sure, George Bush prances around like he's a good Christian, but we all know it's just a big show to attract a targeted voting audience.

When analyzing any of America's actions, rather than look for religious agendas or motivations, I would first ask myself: How can America profit, increase world economic and military domination, or improve homeland security.

America did choose a non-Arab country to openly support, so I guess religion did come into play, but is certaintly not America's primary concern.


Posted by George Smiley on Aug-25-2005 19:46:

quote:
Originally posted by cap
Let's be honest. America is not a very religious country. Sure, George Bush prances around like he's a good Christian, but we all know it's just a big show to attract a targeted voting audience.

Not a very religious country?! Its practically a theocracy ffs!!

quote:
When analyzing any of America's actions, rather than look for religious agendas or motivations, I would first ask myself: How can America profit, increase world economic and military domination, or improve homeland security.

Allying yourselves with Israel improves homeland security?!

quote:
America did choose a non-Arab country to openly support, so I guess religion did come into play, but is certaintly not America's primary concern.

No it chose a non-Soviet country to support. America didn't initiate the alliance due to religion, but it continues because of religion. Have you ever wondered why democrats and republicans argue over who would support Israel the most if they got in power? Why would they even care? Why would it be such an important election issue? Why did Bush say Kerry would sacrifice Israel if elected? What would Bush gain out of that? Maybe he thought the public would be so shocked at the thought of not getting all that wonderful "economic benefits"? Or maybe it was cos of religion?


Posted by Lepanto on Aug-25-2005 20:03:

Early on Israel was embracing socialistic principles and was actually supported by the USSR. However shortly after they switched to a more democratic form of gov't that's where the U.S. realize that they could have a strong ally in a region that is not friendly towards, indifferent at best, the Western world. Israel is a strong and important ally in all kinds of shapes and sizes. It's not about religion because U.S.A. isn't a religious state whatsoever. There are alot of court cases and such based on the religious law but that could happen in the most liberal countries, for example Spain a very conservative and Catholic country has an huge ammount of people who want to legalize homosexual weddings and shit.

What it all comes down to is a term called Harmony of Interest. This is something that all European countries and nowdays the U.S. employ when "helping" others. Take, for example, Hawaii and Micronesia (sp), the US "helped" them out because they needed shit from them, however you can't just come in and take it you gotta give them something in return. So you go and say something like "Listen, we'll help you with some technology and you give us something like your recon tech and such" and Israel, being non-retards, go "well, hell yes" whatever the agenda behind it is not exectly common sense as some people claim it is. it's not just USA is ran by Jews and Israellis need someone like the USA to help them out, though it could be partially true though highly unlikely to be the major cause.


Posted by metalgearsolid on Aug-25-2005 20:23:

quote:
Originally posted by cap
Let's be honest. America is not a very religious country.


quote:
How religion defines America

By Dr Richard Land
Southern Baptist Convention


Unlike some other Western countries, the United States remains an overwhelmingly religious society. The BBC programme What the World Thinks of God examines the modern world's relationship with God. Among those taking part is Dr Richard Land who explains how profoundly religion influences American society and politics.
The USA is a very religious society. Evidence abounds demonstrating Americans' deep and abiding religious convictions.

A Gallup Poll released in November 2003 found that six out of ten Americans said that religion was "very important" in their lives.

FAITH IN AMERICA
Protestant (White Evangelical) 30%
Roman Catholics 25%
Protestant (Liberal) 20%
Protestant (African-American) 8%
Jewish 2%
Other 15%
Source: City University of New York (2001)


In contrast, in Canada and the United Kingdom, two societies often perceived as quite similar to the United States, only 28% and 17% respectively described religion as similarly important in their lives.

A survey done in 2001 by the City University of New York Graduate Center found that 85% of Americans identify with some religious faith.

The same study concluded that by most standards the United States was a more professingly religious country than any European nations except Ireland and Poland.

Conservative belief


Most Americans believe in the literal truth of Old Testament stories
The religious convictions of Americans tend toward the conservative end of the spectrum.

An ABC news poll, done in February 2004, found that approximately 60% of Americans believe that the Genesis creation account, Noah's ark and a global flood, and Moses' parting of the Red Sea are "literally true."

Belief in the literal veracity of these biblical accounts was highest among the fastest growing segment of American faith, evangelical Protestantism (nearly 90% acceptance).

How does such robust religious faith impact and influence American government and the nation's domestic and foreign policies?

Religious vote

An ABC news exit poll taken on Election Day 2000 found that among the 42% of voters who attended religious services at least once a week, 58% voted for Bush.

Conversely, Gore won 61% among the 14% of Americans who reported they never attended religious services.


Perhaps 40% of President Bush's total raw vote was provided by self-identified "evangelical" Christians

Dr Richard Land
It is difficult to imagine the United States electing a candidate with the beliefs and policies of a George W. Bush, or for that matter a Ronald Reagan, without the strong role an increasingly conservative faith plays in tens of millions of Americans' lives.

Some estimates conclude that perhaps 40% of President Bush's total raw vote was provided by self-identified "evangelical" Christians.

Religion and society

How does this deep and abiding religious belief impact American society?

According to an ICM poll in January 2004, Americans believe in the supernatural (91%), an afterlife (74%), "belief in a God/higher power makes you a better human being" (82%), God or a higher power judged their actions (76%), and perhaps most tellingly "would die for their God/beliefs" (71%).

In 1880 Dostoyevsky wrote in The Brothers Karamazov that "If God does not exist, then everything is permissible."

The history of his native Russia, wracked by the atrocities of atheistic communism for most of the 20th century, serves as a most graphic example of the truth of his conclusion.

Nazism, above all detested religion because it called for allegiance to something greater than the state, namely God.


President Bush at the opening of a Bible fellowship centre in Texas
When 71% of Americans say they would die for their faith, they are pledging allegiance to a loyalty beyond their loyalty to their country and are saying the exact polar opposite of "my country, right or wrong."

It is very important at this point to make a critical distinction: to be willing to die for one's faith is utterly different than to kill for it.

The overwhelming majority of Americans, religious and otherwise, would never feel that it is morally acceptable to kill, or even discriminate against, someone because they were of a differing faith or no faith.

As an evangelical Christian, I would not only die for my faith, I would die for any person's right to live their lives according to the dictates of their own consciences.

My personal commitment to the soul liberty of every human being is as deep as my commitment to Jesus Christ as my Saviour and Lord.

Like virtually all Americans of faith, I believe that a person's relationship to his or her God is a sacred matter which no other human being or group of human beings (government or religious communion) has the right to forcibly interfere with or seek to coerce.

As an evangelical Christian I believe in the right to share my faith and to seek to persuade others, as they have an equal right to seek to persuade me, but force or coercion - never!


http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programm...god/3518221.stm



Trust me you don't want to mess with George he knows what he is talking about.


Posted by Lepanto on Aug-25-2005 20:32:

I guess I don't know what the US is mate


Posted by deibero on Aug-26-2005 05:05:

quote:
Originally posted by George Smiley
"Er" is "you're talking rubbish!"

Saying all America's military equipment comes from Israel is "talking rubbish"


rubbish my ass...
first of all, i didnt say all of the arms...
second, what you see and hear is what they want you to think, it isnt the real truth...
america is receiving a lot of arms, tanks, bombs and whatever from israel, either you know it or not or the country admits it or not...


Posted by George Smiley on Aug-26-2005 12:37:

quote:
Originally posted by deibero
rubbish my ass...
first of all, i didnt say all of the arms...
second, what you see and hear is what they want you to think, it isnt the real truth...
america is receiving a lot of arms, tanks, bombs and whatever from israel, either you know it or not or the country admits it or not...

So if Israel and America are not admitting it, how exactly do you know?

You haven't got a clue have you?!


Posted by Lepanto on Aug-26-2005 15:45:

quote:
Originally posted by George Smiley
So if Israel and America are not admitting it, how exactly do you know?

You haven't got a clue have you?!


dude he didn't say America isn't admitting it he said whether or not they do. For example, like the topic of Israel's nuclear arsenal.


Posted by George Smiley on Aug-26-2005 16:09:

quote:
Originally posted by Lepanto
dude he didn't say America isn't admitting it he said whether or not they do. For example, like the topic of Israel's nuclear arsenal.

Who said America has ever helped Israel produce nuclear weapons?


Posted by George Smiley on Aug-26-2005 16:14:

quote:
Originally posted by Lepanto
dude he didn't say America isn't admitting it he said whether or not they do. For example, like the topic of Israel's nuclear arsenal.

I know what he said. And I know Israel and America buy weapons off each other but that can be said for most countries in the western world and does not explain the special relationship. Nobody would find it hard to explain why the US and Britain have a special relationship but I have yet to be convinced by anyone's arguments about why Israel has a special relationship with Israel. It has nothing to do with what weapons Israel makes that America wants (as that would be the same for many countries) It might have a lot to do with Israel being under threat, and certainly that threat + ideology is used to justify the relationship. But why cant politicians in America criticise Israel without having their careers ruined? Why do politicians argue over who would support Israel the most? Why is support for Israel such a crucial election issue? The answers to those questions explains the special relationship and the answer to none of those questions is because of the benefits Israel gives to America that people on here have listed...


Posted by Lepanto on Aug-26-2005 16:21:

quote:
Originally posted by George Smiley
Who said America has ever helped Israel produce nuclear weapons?


Do you know for certain that they didn't? One of America's strongest and top allies not having nuclear weapons? Who knows.


As to the other post though I feel what you are saying, I feel that this thread has pointed out enough reasons for the alliance, the strongest around is the fact that Israel is the only democratic state in a region of totall Western hostillity. Let's go back to the time when the USSR was supporting Israel, let's say it remained that way to this day, do you think we would have the sort of knowledge and intelligence about the middle east as we do thanks to the Mossad (s/p) ?

It's a complex alliance but you could say that about alot of countries. For example the alliance between the UK and the US amazes me after all the conflicts they went through at the early origin of the USA.


Posted by George Smiley on Aug-26-2005 16:31:

quote:
Originally posted by Lepanto
Do you know for certain that they didn't? One of America's strongest and top allies not having nuclear weapons? Who knows.

Who knows?! WHO KNOWS?!?! Is that all you can come up with!! FYI it was France that built Israel's nuclear reactor. Israel got their own uranium from the Negev (France and Britain supplied heavy water) and the Israelis made their own weapons. Hell, the Americans didn't even know about it and when they did, or suspected they were against it


quote:
As to the other post though I feel what you are saying, I feel that this thread has pointed out enough reasons for the alliance, the strongest around is the fact that Israel is the only democratic state in a region of totall Western hostillity. Let's go back to the time when the USSR was supporting Israel, let's say it remained that way to this day, do you think we would have the sort of knowledge and intelligence about the middle east as we do thanks to the Mossad (s/p) ?

It's a complex alliance but you could say that about alot of countries. For example the alliance between the UK and the US amazes me after all the conflicts they went through at the early origin of the USA.

Are you honestly telling me that American elections can be won or lost cos the people of America care so much about buying Israeli arms or intelligence?! Possibly the Americans sympathise with a democracy under attack from terrorists? But why then, did the American public fucking pay for the IRA to attack a democracy? Sorry but that just doesn't wash. There is no existiential threat to Israel. It does not exist and has not existed since the Yom Kippur war (1973 incase you didn't know) Funnily enough, it was AFTER this period that the relationship with Israel really took off...

I could perfectly understand why the relationship is what it is if we were still in the Cold War. Israel served a strategic purpose but that is now extinct. During the Cold War it was the government dictating the need for the relationship, today, it is the American public. You talk of pressuring Israel to strive for peace, you talk of cutting aid to Israel or you criticise Israel - you lose the election...why?


Posted by Lepanto on Aug-26-2005 16:50:

Oh Almighty and Omnipotent George, you know more than all of us put together. You know exectly what the US as ONE entity (because we all know people in the US are all united under one morality and common sense) does and does not do.

How is the alliance pointless now? Shit you could argue that for any alliance that any country in the world holds with another that at one point they were needed and now "they are pointless". Fuck that, let's do what you say, let's just fuck everyone who was our friend yesterday because there is "no point in it"

You would make the biggest imbecile in politics if you were ever one.

You "lose" the election (whichever you're tlaking about) because they are our allies in the Middle East, no one else is, therefore if you cut your ties in the most important and threatfull (do not even start with this) region of the world, you're getting thrown outa office quicker than you can say PAC money.

Furthermore, during the Cold War we had much better "strategical" allies such as Turkey which were right of the coast of the Ukraine, the breadbasket of the USSR, we were even attempting to place rockets there during the Cuba Missile Crisis.


EDIT: ffs

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/US-Israel/special.html

the only link i care about looking up at the moment. This has been by far the most silly thread i've seen here.


Posted by George Smiley on Aug-26-2005 17:19:

quote:
Originally posted by Lepanto
Oh Almighty and Omnipotent George, you know more than all of us put together.

At last he sees sense!

quote:
How is the alliance pointless now? Shit you could argue that for any alliance that any country in the world holds with another that at one point they were needed and now "they are pointless". Fuck that, let's do what you say, let's just fuck everyone who was our friend yesterday because there is "no point in it"

And now he puts words into my mounth...

I said the strategic relevence of Israel during the Cold War is now extinct (clue: the USSR disolved around 15 years ago)

quote:
You would make the biggest imbecile in politics if you were ever one.

Make ur mind up! You just said I knew everything earlier!

quote:
You "lose" the election (whichever you're tlaking about) because they are our allies in the Middle East, no one else is, therefore if you cut your ties in the most important and threatfull (do not even start with this) region of the world, you're getting thrown outa office quicker than you can say PAC money.

That assumes that everything Israel does is correct - it isn't. But domestic pressures dictate that American policy towards Israel should give them carte blanche to act however they want. Only America fails to pressure or (properly) criticise Israel, why is that? Is it cos the rest of the world are wrong? It makes no difference whether or not they are an ally, if they do summat you deem wrong (which a great deal of Israeli actions are) you should say so, not give them the green light to carry on regardless. But American governments cannot do this...why?

quote:
Furthermore, during the Cold War we had much better "strategical" allies such as Turkey which were right of the coast of the Ukraine, the breadbasket of the USSR, we were even attempting to place rockets there during the Cuba Missile Crisis.

You did place missiles there, before the Cuban Missile Crisis. But what does that matter? If anything, it backs up what I'm saying, as Turkey doesn't have the same baring on American politics as Israel does, despite being under attack from terrorists and despite, as you point out, providing a greater ally during the Cold War


quote:
EDIT: ffs

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org...el/special.html

the only link i care about looking up at the moment. This has been by far the most silly thread i've seen here.

Maybe you should look at other sources other than what Mitchell Bard writes? Saying that, he has wrote some interesting stuff on how Jews in America can effect elections, and also how politicians support for Israel effetcs their careers (I think its him, its definately from the same site)


Posted by Lepanto on Aug-27-2005 01:45:



that link should explain more than enough. reason you don't understand it is well, sad? No, you're intelligent enough to gather resources and be informed but not enough to actually understand them apperantly. What is the point of explaining their alliance? Explain the UKs alliance with the US to me then, that's even wierder. The alliance between Israel and USA has just evolved from a simple alliance into a strong bond. That's pretty much all there to it. Who says everything Israel is doing is wrong? That's your own opinion however doesn't disclaim anything talked about in the link I've given. BTW, do not let the jewishpress thing in the site's name fool you since everything gathered from any other large media group would also be under "those darn Jews" jurisdiction seeing as how they pretty much run the Media in the US. And any foreign site could not possibly grasp the complexity and provide a sound explanation for the alliance.

once again

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org...el/special.html

that explains it.


Posted by George Smiley on Aug-27-2005 19:51:

quote:
Originally posted by Lepanto


that link should explain more than enough. reason you don't understand it is well, sad? No, you're intelligent enough to gather resources and be informed but not enough to actually understand them apperantly. What is the point of explaining their alliance? Explain the UKs alliance with the US to me then, that's even wierder.



quote:
Who says everything Israel is doing is wrong? That's your own opinion however doesn't disclaim anything talked about in the link I've given.

Yes. who did say everything Israel does is wrong?

quote:
BTW, do not let the jewishpress thing in the site's name fool you since everything gathered from any other large media group would also be under "those darn Jews" jurisdiction seeing as how they pretty much run the Media in the US.

Seriously tho, is English your first language?!

quote:
And any foreign site could not possibly grasp the complexity and provide a sound explanation for the alliance.

Eh?

quote:
once again

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org...el/special.html

that explains it.

That certainly describes the alliance, doesn't do much in the way of explaining it tho. It does, however, say..."Americans' affinity for Israelis also stems from our shared Judeo-Christian heritage" which you seem to have completely ignored

Anyway, have a butchers at this...

http://www.jcpa.org/jl/vp446.htm

And perhaps you'd like to comment on the power of the Christian Right and their views on Israel?


Posted by Lepanto on Aug-27-2005 23:43:

doesn't the fact that there's only me and you left indicate that no one really cares anymore? There has been enough clarification about why US and Israel have a tight alliance, it started off one way and grew into a tight one. Why did the US become the country it is, economically or socially? no one really knows it just evolves into it.

/close thread.


Pages (3): « 1 2 [3]

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.