TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- State funded sex?
Pages (3): « 1 2 [3]

Determined priests and nuns do it...

quote:

Originally posted by metalgearsolid ^^^I thought the number one thing girls look for is security. By security I mean money and if someone has money than that person has security and that is what all girls look for. I am sorry HTP I think you are wrong and Gmoney obviously is wrong as well but he has a clue.

Then how do the drunkin loser bad boys give a women security by beating her?

How does that logic work?

Most of these types are neither wealthy, nor smart, nor do they offer security. LOL

quote:

Originally posted by Yoepus WTF is wrong with you man?! Say a person loses his legs in an airplane accident - one that killed 200 people and he is the lone survivor. With his legs he lost his charmingly good looks and no women will sleep with him anymore. Does not mean that he is evolutionarly unfit to have had offsprings? Had he been full-functioning he could very well of had kids and helped produce airplane accident resistant spawn. But you would have no say about it because "evolution" told him to lose his legs and become unattractive seriously, how old are you?

LOL, you guys have absolutely no clue about anything. One of the biggest problems people create for the next generation is choosing a bad mate. Ever hear of single moms, you know, the ones with the deadbeat dads, or the ones where the father was arrested for armed robbery and isn't there for the children cause he's stupid.

How about the women who choose danger over security and date guys who beat them. Evolutionary fit you say... Maybe. Perhaps a woman who dated such a guy could tell us her reason for dating such imbeciles.

She might say, well I was looking for security and safety, but that wasn't available so I chose the dude who beat me instead. Anything is better than nothing in a woman's mind I guess.

I think we should put feminism aside and create a man's movement dedicated to fixing the female condition instead. LOL

quote:

Originally posted by Verona^My LOL, you guys have absolutely no clue about anything. One of the biggest problems people create for the next generation is choosing a bad mate. Ever hear of single moms, you know, the ones with the deadbeat dads, or the ones where the father was arrested for armed robbery and isn't there for the children cause he's stupid. How about the women who choose danger over security and date guys who beat them. Evolutionary fit you say... Maybe. Perhaps a woman who dated such a guy could tell us her reason for dating such imbeciles. She might say, well I was looking for security and safety, but that wasn't available so I chose the dude who beat me instead. Anything is better than nothing in a woman's mind I guess. I think we should put feminism aside and create a man's movement dedicated to fixing the female condition instead. LOL

wtf you quote me on that

quote:

Originally posted by Verona^My Then how do the drunkin loser bad boys give a women security by beating her? How does that logic work? Most of these types are neither wealthy, nor smart, nor do they offer security. LOL

Verona I never meant guys who beat thier wifes. Hitting a girl is very wrong and also insulting her. Its why I am always a sucker when a girl asks for my help. I can't say no .

Most women who marry abusive husbands; were abused when they were younger. They are victims and they don't know anybetter.

Lots of Women marry men who are like thier father.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.