TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- Which country you think will US attack next?
Pages (6): « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 »
| quote: |
| Originally posted by zookeeper It's so nice to be wanted |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Lepanto my city |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by zookeeper It's my city DAMMIT! I payed for it, ALL of it! |

I don't know if i'm wrong but i'm positive i heard that if US attacks Iran then North Korea have said to help Iran fight US.
Damn, i remember reading this somewhere.. i have to try find out where.
And by the way, Iran is very strong, don't under estimate them.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Psygnosis I don't know if i'm wrong but i'm positive i heard that if US attacks Iran then North Korea have said to help Iran fight US. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Psygnosis I don't know if i'm wrong but i'm positive i heard that if US attacks Iran then North Korea have said to help Iran fight US. Damn, i remember reading this somewhere.. i have to try find out where. And by the way, Iran is very strong, don't under estimate them. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Lepanto Because the great Dictator...err President Putin . |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Purple That is so Cool! |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by zookeeper sick |
http://www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/nationalsecurity/
straight from the horses mouth:
| quote: |
| The ideology known as Islamic radicalism, militant Jihadism, or Islamo-fascism - different from the religion of Islam - exploits Islam to serve a violent political vision that calls for the murder of all those who do not share it. The followers of Islamic radicalism are bound together by their shared ideology, not by any centralized command structure. Although they fight on scattered battlefields, these terrorists share a similar ideology and vision for the world openly stated in videos, audiotapes, letters, declarations, and websites. |
| quote: |
| As they once did in Afghanistan and are trying to do now in Iraq, they will seek to gain control of an entire country - a base from which to launch attacks and conduct their war against non-radical Muslim governments. |
| quote: |
| The radicals exploit local conflicts to build a culture of victimization, exploit resentful and disillusioned young men and women, and use modern technology to multiply their destructive power. |
| quote: |
| They are sheltered and supported by authoritarian regimes - allies of convenience like Syria and Iran - that share the goal of hurting America and moderate Muslim governments, and that use terrorist propaganda to blame their own failures on the West, America, and Jews. They are strengthened by front operations - such as corrupted charities - and those who aggressively fund the spread of radical, intolerant versions of Islam. The militants are aided by elements of the Arab news media that incite hatred and anti-Semitism, feed conspiracy theories, and speak of a so-called American "war on Islam" - with seldom a word about American action to protect Muslims in Afghanistan, Bosnia, Somalia, Kosovo, Kuwait, and Iraq. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Lepanto Doubtful. First off, if the USA has any reason to attack Iran it will be because of their nuclear weapons program. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Purple Was the ONLY reason US had to attack Iraq was because of WMD? No it was oil. And poor Iran got oil too. |

I still want Canada.
Those damn Canadians.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by zookeeper Ok dude...let's play. ![]() Kuwait, in it's small size, has just as much/more oil than Iraq. We were there and liberated it, if we are such a bunch of heartless/imperialist bastards, why didn't we just say "Nice oil Haji, I think we'll take it." and Kuwait would be our 53rd state! your ball...Mr. Know-it-all/Mr. I-hate-America P.S....after filling up my SUV, taking Kuwait's oil doesn't sound like such a bad idea. Ya know, since the world thinks we are so terrible, I think perhaps we should start living up to the reputation. ...end of flame* |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by zookeeper Ok dude...let's play. ![]() Kuwait, in it's small size, has just as much/more oil than Iraq. We were there and liberated it, if we are such a bunch of heartless/imperialist bastards, why didn't we just say "Nice oil Haji, I think we'll take it." and Kuwait would be our 53rd state! your ball...Mr. Know-it-all/Mr. I-hate-America P.S....after filling up my SUV, taking Kuwait's oil doesn't sound like such a bad idea. Ya know, since the world thinks we are so terrible, I think perhaps we should start living up to the reputation. ...end of flame* |
)
| quote: |
| Originally posted by MisterOpus1 I still want Canada. Those damn Canadians. |
***sound of homicidal laughter***
| quote: |
| Originally posted by DrUg_Tit0 There's no point in invading Kuwait or Saudi Arabia because they're already providing US with relatively cheap oil that would not be any cheaper if the US invaded. Iraq, on the other hand, would not be so forthcoming to sell cheap oil to the US and to give US companies a hold on their oil fields, and that's why it was invaded. Aside from that, it also decided to switch its monetary reserves from dollars into euros. |
Best case senario: Bush nukes Iran.... x50.... one for each star on the flag of the United States of America!!!
| quote: |
| Originally posted by dj_ilan_yosef Best case senario: Bush nukes Iran.... x50.... one for each star on the flag of the United States of America!!! |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by zookeeper The Invasion of Canada: The Upside: We would finally get some "real" beer. A great way to get my money back from that evil Casino Niagara. The Rocky Mountains would get more competition for skiing. I could take a more direct route to Alaska Canadian crab/salmon/bacon, at a reasonable price. Canadians could buy cigarettes at a reasonable price (sort of) Canadians could buy beer at any 24 hour gas station. (NY law) No more lines at the Peace Bridge to Canada ...AND Canada has A TON of oil ***sound of homicidal laughter***The Downside: The "strip clubs" would have to follow American law, suck. ![]() WE would have to deal with the whole acid rain "thing" All those funny Indian names. We would lose the good currency exchange rate. Canadians would be livid about paying a full college tuition ...AND where would the next generation of "draft dodgers" go. Please, do feel free to add.... |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Lemonad I don't care about politics much, but i do hate arrogant people. With that comment, i'm not suprised Iran hates Israel and America loves you people. So you need America to do a job Israel can't do? So why don't go do the usual thing you do everyday, and go give your father a headjob, it might release the tension you have on a dying war. Oh sorry, was that too hard.. sorry, you can go cry. This whole thread is stupid just for the mere fact that war is the stupid way to deal with problems. Don't justify anything just yet, because nothing is right when it falls in the hands of arrogance. I pity them. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Lemonad I don't care about politics much, but i do hate arrogant people. With that comment, i'm not suprised Iran hates Israel and America loves you people. So you need America to do a job Israel can't do? So why don't go do the usual thing you do everyday, and go give your father a headjob, it might release the tension you have on a dying war. Oh sorry, was that too hard.. sorry, you can go cry. This whole thread is stupid just for the mere fact that war is the stupid way to deal with problems. Don't justify anything just yet, because nothing is right when it falls in the hands of arrogance. I pity them. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by dj_ilan_yosef Best case senario: Bush nukes Iran.... x50.... one for each star on the flag of the United States of America!!! |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by hardcore trancer I say we throw your government and all of IDF into Concentration camps. |
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.