TOTA SUPERBOWL XL Thread - Pittsburgh Steelers vs. Seattle Seahawks

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Canada - Toronto & Southern Ont.
-- TOTA SUPERBOWL XL Thread - Pittsburgh Steelers vs. Seattle Seahawks
Pages (4): « 1 2 [3] 4 »

Posted by rabbitjoker on Feb-05-2006 20:07:

Re: Re: Re: Re: MY BETS ARE IN!

quote:
Originally posted by Floorwhore
Nice. So you do all your bets online??

I only bet on Grey Cup and Superbowl games. I started about 5 years ago with a $100 US$ deposit into my BOS (Bet On Sports) account and I'm up to $1000 US$ (less the $150 I have on today's game).

I highly recommend BOS.

Posted by DigDeep on Feb-05-2006 20:12:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: MY BETS ARE IN!

quote:
Originally posted by rabbitjoker
I only bet on Grey Cup and Superbowl games. I started about 5 years ago with a $100 US$ deposit into my BOS (Bet On Sports) account and I'm up to $1000 US$ (less the $150 I have on today's game).

I highly recommend BOS.

registered.

Posted by rabbitjoker on Feb-05-2006 20:13:

Re: Re: Re: Re: MY BETS ARE IN!

quote:
Originally posted by Floorwhore
i like Seattle a lot for this game.

I was originally thinking that Pittsburgh would win this. After reflecting on how the Steelers got to the Superbowl (Cinci didn't have their QB, Indy had Dungy's family issues, Denver was horrible), it appears that they may have "slipped" into the game (without a true test).

Seattle's roster, coach and defence have been tested and still managed to make it to the game. I think this fact will show tonight. Seattle will cover (and very well may win outright).

Posted by DigDeep on Feb-05-2006 20:29:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: MY BETS ARE IN!

quote:
Originally posted by rabbitjoker
I was originally thinking that Pittsburgh would win this. After reflecting on how the Steelers got to the Superbowl (Cinci didn't have their QB, Indy had Dungy's family issues, Denver was horrible), it appears that they may have "slipped" into the game (without a true test).

Seattle's roster, coach and defence have been tested and still managed to make it to the game. I think this fact will show tonight. Seattle will cover (and very well may win outright).

agreed 1000%. good luck buddy

Posted by Special K on Feb-05-2006 20:53:

im taking seattle on the moneyline @ +160

gooooooo seahawks!

Posted by dnmr on Feb-05-2006 21:23:

Does anyone wants free tickets to go to the Dock's for a Superbowl party tix are $15 but i have 30 frees passes call my cell lucas mead . 416 786 7871

Posted by loca on Feb-05-2006 22:07:

I'm going to root for the underdog on this one. So I say Seahawks

Posted by DigDeep on Feb-05-2006 23:12:

Re: MY BETS ARE IN!

FG Seattle Seahawks +4
Wager: $50
Win: $45

----------------------

FG Seattle Seahawks +150
Wager: $50
Win: $75

All bets in US$

GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO SEAHAWKS!!!!!

Posted by Plump Funk on Feb-05-2006 23:28:

lol @ the star spangled banner, couldn't stop laughing.

Posted by rabbitjoker on Feb-05-2006 23:50:

quote:
Originally posted by Plump Funk
lol @ the star spangled banner, couldn't stop laughing.

Why is that? Care to elaborate?

Posted by rabbitjoker on Feb-05-2006 23:52:

New Global TV Branding

Anybody notice the new Global TV branding?

The little red wedge looks like it has been taken out of Rogers's red hexagon - and the little two tone sound that accompanies the wedge is reminiscent of the "Rogers Sound".

Posted by DigDeep on Feb-06-2006 01:09:

Fuck.

What a brutal start to the game for Seattle. They dominated in yardage, but due to poor special teams (aka mr. punter), they wasted sixty total yards in field position. To make things even worse, Rothlesberger flings up an improbable pass down to the 3 yard line on a 3rd and 28, and then scores on a qb keeper in which the ball didnt cross the goal line!. What was up with Hasselbeck taking his sweet ass time on the drive that ended the first half ?

Seattle really needs to start capitalizing.

Posted by yankeeBaby on Feb-06-2006 01:24:

^^ Tell us how you really feel

Dissapointed in the commercials...except for the revolving "magic fridge" from Budweiser

Posted by Plump Funk on Feb-06-2006 01:45:

quote:
Originally posted by rabbitjoker
Why is that? Care to elaborate?

Aaron Neville singing was hillarious, he sounds like he should be a voice on south park. and after Horatio Sanz last nite making fun of him i couldn't sit still when he started singing.

Posted by Spin Laden on Feb-06-2006 02:04:

Bell really sucks!!

Posted by Plump Funk on Feb-06-2006 02:07:

quote:
Originally posted by Spin Laden
Bell really sucks!!

change your channel to ABC, no Bell commercials.

Posted by jester on Feb-06-2006 02:08:

wtf this shit!

Posted by Spin Laden on Feb-06-2006 02:22:

quote:
Originally posted by Plump Funk
change your channel to ABC, no Bell commercials.

'Just did, looks like Global is carrying the feed here for ABC too. I thought I saw ABC reporter Suzy Kolber on the sidelines.. where's Joe Namath when you need him.

Posted by Spin Laden on Feb-06-2006 02:34:

man is he hammered here (skip the intro)

http://www.ifilm.com/ifilmdetail/2483773?htv=12

Posted by jester on Feb-06-2006 02:36:

MacGyver for Mastercard > all

Posted by VERTiG0 on Feb-06-2006 02:52:

quote:
Originally posted by Spin Laden
'Just did, looks like Global is carrying the feed here for ABC too. I thought I saw ABC reporter Suzy Kolber on the sidelines.. where's Joe Namath when you need him.

He's busy doing public awareness spots for vapour lock.

Posted by rabbitjoker on Feb-06-2006 02:55:

Seattle hasn't even shown up this half (2nd half)... Unbelievable.

Posted by Plump Funk on Feb-06-2006 02:59:

quote:
Originally posted by jesteraver
MacGyver for Mastercard > all

i liked the Hummer commercial with robot and godzilla.

Posted by rabbitjoker on Feb-06-2006 03:06:

Re: MY BETS ARE IN!

quote:
Originally posted by rabbitjoker
FG Seattle Seahawks +4
Wager: $75
LOSS

FG Under +46�
Wager: $75
Win: $68
WIN

Win one, lose one. Net loss $7.

Posted by Plump Funk on Feb-06-2006 03:07:

this superbowl wasn't that exciting, i expected way more.

Pages (4): « 1 2 [3] 4 »