TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- FIFA World Cup 2006 - Germany
-- Switzerland - South Korea (June 23rd 2006) [Group G]
Pages (3): « 1 2 [3]


Posted by Lira on Jun-23-2006 22:08:

quote:
Originally posted by paranoik0
Korea weren't the best here (altho from the little that i watched from the game it looked like they had a couple chances, maybe deserved a draw), and weren't the best in half the games they won 4 years ago neither. Particularly against Spain.

Como assim?

Both in this world cup and the last one, you can hardly pick another team that played as passionate and as graceful as the Korean. You could even complain about the results, but certainly, that's what mattered the least when they were in the field.


Posted by Lira on Jun-23-2006 22:10:

quote:
Originally posted by InterMilan31
lira I was kidding on the sig dont spend time on it mate its ok but I do have to say you were wrong and very misguided by the Koreans.

Not actually: If I say they're the best, that's because they were the best in my judgement, and even though they're defeated, they're still the best ones to me.

Meh, there goes half of the excitement of this world cup... it's a shame Ghana is playing against Brazil now


Posted by zoric on Jun-23-2006 22:19:

It's going to be hard for Ghana without Essien, but I hope they make it through


Posted by noikeee on Jun-23-2006 22:20:

quote:
Originally posted by Lira
Como assim?

Both in this world cup and the last one, you can hardly pick another team that played as passionate and as graceful as the Korean. You could even complain about the results, but certainly, that's what mattered the least when they were in the field.


what do you exactly mean with passionate and graceful, and what does it have to do with quality on the field?

cause in this cup "only" Brazil, Germany, Holland, Argentina, France, Italy, Portugal, Czech, Ghana, Ivory Coast, Switzerland, Spain, Australia, Sweden, England were clearly better than the koreans.

i know you cheer for them, and can understand the bias, just being rational here


Posted by Lira on Jun-23-2006 22:54:

quote:
Originally posted by paranoik0
what do you exactly mean with passionate and graceful, and what does it have to do with quality on the field?

cause in this cup "only" Brazil, Germany, Holland, Argentina, France, Italy, Portugal, Czech, Ghana, Ivory Coast, Switzerland, Spain, Australia, Sweden, England were clearly better than the koreans.

i know you cheer for them, and can understand the bias, just being rational here

Simply put, they were not the favourites, nor they're a country with much tradition in football, and they knew that. Therefore, they didn't have that feeling that "they're good already" and they knew they'd have to play a lot better than usual in order to advance. And they did. You could clearly see the passion in their eyes (and in the eyes of their fans). Their "omgwtfbbq" attitude was something that really caught me. That was the grace I wanted to see - quality, to me, little has to do with results... I want to see people giving their best, that's all.

Brazil has already that "favourite" status, and their matches (with the exception of Brazil vs. Japan) weren't that exciting, specially when people expected them to win already. I'd say Australia was pretty impressive though, whereas both African teams you mentioned were just too violent, I didn't like that. Same for Italy, that game against the US was pathetic.

I don't want to turn this post into a exhaustive list, but I think I explained why Korea was blatantly my favourite team in this world cup.


Posted by noikeee on Jun-23-2006 23:36:

quote:
Originally posted by Lira
I don't want to turn this post into a exhaustive list, but I think I explained why Korea was blatantly my favourite team in this world cup.


It's perfectly fine to have favourites. It's just that a while again you were talking about them as the "best", which is a whole different thing.


Posted by Lira on Jun-23-2006 23:49:

quote:
Originally posted by paranoik0
It's perfectly fine to have favourites. It's just that a while again you were talking about them as the "best", which is a whole different thing.

Given the fact that being "the best" is a subjective quality, I can say they're the best - as long as my concept of "good" doesn't involve any requirement that they don't fullfil


Posted by noikeee on Jun-24-2006 01:28:

quote:
Originally posted by Lira
Given the fact that being "the best" is a subjective quality, I can say they're the best - as long as my concept of "good" doesn't involve any requirement that they don't fullfil


best is a very subjective word in many matters.. but IMO in the context of a competition it can only mean the one who wins, or the one who looks most capable of winning

all a question of semantics

(and yes, in case you were wondering it is 2:30 AM here)


Posted by Iyrlk on Jun-24-2006 07:50:

i went to this world cup stadium in seoul, korea.
the air was vibrant and people were so excited. i mean 60,000 ppl in this stadium cheered from 9 pm to 6 am. and god, there were so many hot girls. too bad there wasn't a goal from the koreans. i was expecting some chicks to go crazy hehe oh well..

as for the game, the referee was indeed shit. not because i think he was biased towards swiss, but simply because he made shitty calls to both sides during the whole game. and what the hell is with this guy, i think he gave out like a million yellow cards. i think koreans now feel what italy felt 4 years ago hehe. and also, swiss is going to have a hard time with all the yellows they have. how will that help swiss on their next game?? which all sums up to my original point. damn stupid referee.

i think koreans were just disappointed because korea's attack revived during the second half. swiss dominated most of the ground in first half, but korea was doing a lot better in the second half. there were calls that were controvercial to both sides, but korea had more unfair calls koreans were indeed pissed off about the second goal, but for quite a few of us, it wasn't just the goal that the referee gave to swiss, but also the will to go on. at 1:0 which both sides bombarding each other with good attacks, many koreans felt that with some luck we might even tie.

i mean anyone who watched the game knew that both the swiss and koreans had great chances for some goals. no matter how much europe generally hate the korean team, koreans fought well. we knew that france and swiss were going to be great, but korea gave em hell for each game im damn proud of korea's football team.

and the one thing i dont like with this whole situation is that, some people are just too angry about the whole thing, its not a war, you dont have to hate each other and their teams just cause of football. i hate how people's attitude towards each other is mindlessly offensive, vulgar, and disrespectful.

if i saw right, korean players kept their integrity even after the game. do you remember italy and spain? most of them didn't even shake hands and just left the game. oh well, we have better sportsmanship than 'some' european teams, and thats something i guess would be nice to see from some ppl in this forum.


Posted by noikeee on Jun-24-2006 12:28:

after watching the 2nd goal again, i take back what i said. right call, the original pass wasn't intended to Frei at all before the deflection


Posted by Eddie N MIAMI on Jun-24-2006 12:39:

Seoul City Hall in Korea during yesterday game




that mustve been alot of pissed off koreans.


Posted by Yohan on Jun-25-2006 03:16:

quote:
Originally posted by paranoik0
after watching the 2nd goal again, i take back what i said. right call, the original pass wasn't intended to Frei at all before the deflection


I thought it doesn't matter whether pass was intended or not? If someone shoots, hits the post and rebound goes to teammate who is in offside position, that is still offside, no?

Hope Lee Chun Soo gets another shot at European football. His stint in La Liga sucked, but his game is more suited for England anyways.


Posted by noikeee on Jun-25-2006 14:54:

quote:
Originally posted by EvilTree
I thought it doesn't matter whether pass was intended or not? If someone shoots, hits the post and rebound goes to teammate who is in offside position, that is still offside, no?


The post is considered neutral, so it's still an original pass from the attacker, but if it comes off an opponent player it's a different matter. A portuguese referee who analised that play yesterday on TV said that it was a correct decision since he doesn't interpret it as a "deflection", but as a "pass" from a korean.

It's all a bit confusing since the rules for offside have changed a bit over the last few years.


Posted by infinity0908 on Jun-26-2006 03:38:

quote:
Originally posted by Eddie N MIAMI
Seoul City Hall in Korea during yesterday game




that mustve been alot of pissed off koreans.


I think that's from 2002 world cup.
cuz it was 4am in Korea when the match was being played.


Posted by infinity0908 on Jun-26-2006 03:40:


see that's an offside.


Posted by InterMilan31 on Jun-26-2006 06:35:

quote:
Originally posted by infinity0908

see that's an offside.


jackass the korea defender deflected the ball neglecting the offside call


Posted by noikeee on Jun-26-2006 08:56:

quote:
Originally posted by infinity0908

see that's an offside.


too bad the original pass came only afterwards from the player below Frei and Barnetta, and for it to be deflected in a completely opposite direction.


Pages (3): « 1 2 [3]

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.