TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- America: From Freedom to Fascism (MUST SEE)
Pages (3): « 1 2 [3]

quote:

Originally posted by Arbiter Yes, they have ruled that way 100% of the time.

wrong as of July 2007



http://youtube.com/watch?v=l5Of8M1MZJQ

quote:

Shreveport attorney, Tom Cryer, won a unanimous NOT GUILTY verdict in federal district court defeating the IRS's claim that Tom "willfully" failed to file federal income tax returns. Tom refused to file tax returns because the IRS could not show him any law making him liable for 'filing' a tax return. NOW, nothing in this Internet Video Press Release is intended to recommend that you cease to file tax returns or meet other demands of the IRS lawful or otherwise. PLEASE... PLEASE... PLEASE do nothing that will give the IRS any excuse to cut you from the herd and drag you off to its slaughterhouse! However, we do urge you to visit TruthAttack . org and fight this grand theft by deception under the protection of your FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS!

AMERICA: Freedom To Fascism

Aaron Russo Interview



[[ LINK REMOVED ]]

quote:

Originally posted by Trancer-X wrong as of July 2007 http://youtube.com/watch?v=l5Of8M1MZJQ

that's a criminal case with a jury and has absolutely NO bearing on what arbiter said at all! go and find a case where the legality of income tax is presented to the judiciary, or go away. a jury's decision means absolutely nothing and has no power of precedent etc.

seriously, i expect more from you.

you tools get so bent out of shape when the truth is exposed

quote:

Originally posted by Trancer-X you tools get so bent out of shape when the truth is exposed

no, i get bent out of shape when people post disingenuous nonsense.

arbiter said no court has ever ruled against the right of the government to collect income tax. a jury decision is NOT a court/judicial ruling.

so what you said is obviously wrong.

did you have a hard time reading the fine print?

here, I'll enlarge it for you

quote:

Tom Cryer, won a unanimous NOT GUILTY verdict in federal district court defeating the IRS's claim that Tom "willfully" failed to file federal income tax returns. Tom refused to file tax returns because the IRS could not show him any law making him liable for 'filing' a tax return

Sure, it was a jury case and yes he did win.

quote:

Originally posted by Trancer-X did you have a hard time reading the fine print? here, I'll enlarge it for you Sure, it was a jury case and yes he did win.

did you have a hard time understanding what arbiter originally said? here, i'll bold it for you.

quote:

Originally posted by Arbiter There are a variety of issues that have gone to court related to income tax which have been ruled on in various ways, but no court has ever ruled that: 1. Income tax is unconstitutional, 2. income tax doesn't apply to wages, or 3. you don't have to file a tax return and pay that tax. Many of this cases, such as the ones in that video, have been misappropriated by tax protestors in an attempt to use them to show something beyond what the ruling actually states. However, this does not lend their arguments any more strength.

a criminal case, with a jury decision is NOT a "court ruling".

so you're still wrong. is this how you approach all your "research"? no wonder you swallow anything youtube tells you.

quote:

wrong as of July 2007

so, show me the court ruling arbiter was referring to, or stop posting dishonest nonsense.

so you're getting all worked up over semantics?

the court ruled in Tom Cryer's favor

Anyway, I've been up for 20 hours so give me a break, you soulless traitor to humanity

I just got my W2 and I will be filing my taxes. $600 tax break from the man himself, BUSH...

Yea, even though everyone gets a tax break, the excessive spending continues. How can we have tax breaks if our expenditures don't likewise, decline also? IT DOESN'T!

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.