TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Canada - Toronto & Southern Ont.
-- Jehovah's Witnesses - religious insanity?
Pages (3): « 1 2 [3]
| quote: |
| Originally posted by EvilTree Just a quip here. Science is not against religion, but are compatible with each other. Ah well. God has a lot to answer if I ever get to heaven |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Cro_Addict I understand the passion, but I don't like people coming to my door if I don't want them there. I try to be polite when they come. I pretty much always say "Thank you, but I worship Satan in my basement". This usually leads to an awkward silence then they just turn around and leave. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Dj Smitty20 that's only partially true. They are often at odds with each other. Like for example, creationists suggesting that the dinosaurs existed at the same time as man when they clearly did not, or ingoring our nearly complete genetic similarity to chimpanzees (over 99%). |
| quote: |
I myself do not disbelieve in a God. obviously there is some kind of higher being, power or old guy out there or else why the hell are we, or ANYTHING, here to begin with? Its actually quite scary. My own opinion is that religions have been created to explain the unexplainable and, as we progress scientifically, technologically, culturally, etc, we begin to see what we thought 2000 years ago might not exactly have been right. But that's just me. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Cro_Addict I understand the passion, but I don't like people coming to my door if I don't want them there. I try to be polite when they come. I pretty much always say "Thank you, but I worship Satan in my basement". This usually leads to an awkward silence then they just turn around and leave. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Dj Smitty20 yes I would say I concur with that broad line of thinking. I am not religious at all and am glad my dad resisted my mom's urging to have me sent to Sunday school, attend church, etc, etc. Then I discovered Darwin at age 14..... ![]() |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Revival160 Again, I recommed the Richard Dawkins book - the God Delusion - for both theists and atheists alike. It raises many great issues and calls into question the blind following of religion. |
i totally dug this thread - thanks for your opinion Muzzybear - I may not always agree with you but I love that you ahve taken the time to share that 
| quote: |
| Originally posted by jennypie Well it's THEIR belief. That's why the world needs educated health care professionals to advocate for these kind of people, to let them know there ARE options for them. Sure, to US it's retarded...but what's MORE retarded is the lack of education on the matter. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Abercrombie Take the Jehova's Witness quiz. http://www.thebentinel.com/jw-quiz.php I got "You are 40% Jehovah's Witness!" |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Revival160 This raises an interesting question in itself. Are children (in this case babies) of any religion? Is it fair to force a religion upon a person of any age, based on the beliefs of their parents? That certainly doesn't fly for politics. You never hear anyone say 'she's a progressive conservative' child. Because it's not considered acceptable to force politics on a child. For some reason (that our society has accepted for thousands of years), religion gets a free pass in this respect. Muslim child, Catholic child, Jewish child - all very normal terms. I'm not trying to put religion and politics on the same page here, as many people will have much stronger convictions when it comes to religion. I'm just asking questions and trying to apply some logic. Again, I recommed the Richard Dawkins book - the God Delusion - for both theists and atheists alike. It raises many great issues and calls into question the blind following of religion. |
Well I heard a discussion about it on CBC Radio today over lunch, and I therefore got a chance to hear others across many fields weigh in on this matter (health practitioners, Canadian law specialists, Jehovah Witness's, and a man that specialize in religious and medical ethics).
After hearing this debate (BOTH sides were very powerfully discussed, this wasn't a one sided debate), I support these JW's right to practice their belief(s).
I also find it hard to condemn them (as many were doing originally in this thread) for not wanting to go through with this.
Ppl say "how can you do this, don't you love your children?"
Well... I say now "don't these parents love their god?" Their god laid it out CLEARLY in scripture that blood is sacred and should not be taken (whatever the "exact" wording was, but I'm aware that it was CLEARLY stated... it wasn't like this is a matter where one could be misinterpreting that JW bible statement wrong or that it was unclear and really open to interpretation!).
That's a pretty fucking hard choice... you're asked to decide who you love and would do more for: your newborn children or the god you have worshipped your entire life!
If you allow this transfusion in the hopes of saving your kids lives, then you're betraying your god! How can you possibly think of doing that!?!
And if you don't allow the transfusion, then you're essentially allowing your babies to die when they may have had a chance to live...!
Additionally, I'm not sure, but if a JW were to consciously allow a transfusion, I wouldn't be surprise if such an act could jeopardize their chance of getting into heaven or reaching and existing in that place or 'state of mind' that is after life (I'm not familiar with their exact belief system there.) Man... if that's true, shit, that's a massive thing to ask of a person... Disobey your god and try to help the chances of your kids living, but then be forced to live the REST OF YOUR LIFE knowing you betrayed your god and your religions beliefs, and now you may never attain whatever is waiting for you after life.
How can you judge someone for not wishing to make that choice? (assuming that such an act could cause such a thing in their belief system... this was just a hypothetical idea of what such an act may or could mean in the future of JWs both in this life and the next.)
Also, if you did this and got extricated by the JWs... that is SERIOUS SHIT for them! There is a JW (well she was raised that way anyways) at work who's a friend of mine, and she was was kicked out of their "temple" (their version of the church, if I got the term right) for getting pregnant when shes was a teenager, and that was MASSIVE thing (for her, her parents and the this entire JW community).
You are publicly denounced in front of your temple. The elders stand in judgement over you publicly at temple. All ppl of this JW community (temple?) in Collingwood were told they were not to associate ANY LONGER with Cindy. That's hardcore. You're entire social circle could also disappear then too. Close, close friends you have in the faith could/would now be forbidden to associate with you at all... wow.
That would make me second guess wanting to betray my god and faith's explicit scriptures too.
The parents have to weight all these things in. I feel so bad for them, the strife they must be facing. What a fucking SHITTY-ASS CHOICE they are forced to face and live with here -- WHATEVER their choice, either way. 
And just to state, I'm an passionate atheist, not a Witness, so it's not like I'm speaking here of beliefs that I hold personally. I am merely placing myself in their shoes and analyzing the issues they are facing based on their beliefs, and all the consequences they are having to face bc of any choices they make here.
Having to choose between your god and your children is a DAMN SHITTY choice to be faced with. Period. Most (young) ppl don't strongly enough believe in god nowadays to really understand the gravity they face bc their conviction in god is SO STRONG! For too many, god is often look at as a comforting convenience, not someone/something we really worry about if we do something he hates (ie. sex before marriage, drugs, etc). The JWs don't see it that way at all. If you have a big choice: your god's ways or death (for yourself, for a different example), well you chose death for yourself then. This is your god and you worship him, he will look after you. They take that seriously. And good for them for doing that. If you're going to have a conviction, take it seriously, not just when it suits you and fits comfortable in your life!
They shouldn't be judge as harshly as they are being. And that's fucking coming from an atheist who strongly dislikes all religions. I am merely trying to be objective, as we all should be when placing judgments on this situation with these or any other JWs.
As already stated and mentioned above, Canada grants all ppl the right of religious expression, and we are fucking taking that right away from there here too, I may add. Horrible.
Jem
Think of this. For all you people who believe in total religious freedom (I do not), consider this practice in Africa.
In many African societies, religion and culture dictate that females be circumcised and "sewn up" in their childhood. Is this a humane practice? Absolutely not and it would NOT be allowed to happen here on religious grounds, you can count on that.
Is not letting a child die when they could be saved through a simple medical procedue abuse of that child's rights?
I'm actually a little surprised a few of you on here would actually sit idly by (if you were a doctor) and let an infant die because their parents held a very uncommon religious belief that prohibits the transfusion of blood.
Religious freedom is tolerable...to an extent. This is one of those cases where I would draw the line and save a life.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Dj Smitty20 Think of this. For all you people who believe in total religious freedom (I do not), consider this practice in Africa. In many African societies, religion and culture dictate that females be circumcised and "sewn up" in their childhood. Is this a humane practice? Absolutely not and it would NOT be allowed to happen here on religious grounds, you can count on that. Is not letting a child die when they could be saved through a simple medical procedue abuse of that child's rights? |
| quote: |
I'm actually a little surprised a few of you on here would actually sit idly by (if you were a doctor) and let an infant die because their parents held a very uncommon religious belief that prohibits the transfusion of blood. |
| quote: |
Religious freedom is tolerable...to an extent. This is one of those cases where I would draw the line and save a life. |
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.