TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Canada - Toronto & Southern Ont.
-- Just so everyone knows....
Pages (4): « 1 2 [3] 4 »


Posted by Nostrum on Feb-02-2007 23:56:

quote:
Originally posted by Cosmic Fur
This one I actually figured out. He's being sarcastic because everyone jumped on him when he quoted stuff from an unrelated thread in that other thread where he made a jackass of himself by quoting things from an unrelated thread.


Not sure if I would say jack ass. I was illustrating a point of principal. The context was irrelevant. That was the point. The reason for that remark here, your very close, was because while I was being flammed for my quoting, others were introducing quotes from all over the forum to do so. Double standard????


Posted by Nostrum on Feb-02-2007 23:58:

quote:
Originally posted by Cosmic Fur
Actually, with 17 votes and 541 views, I'm not sure that's true.


That's not the reason for the weak results. It's likely because most don't know what "Ambiguous" means.

Edit: The purpose of this poll has more then served it's self for me. If there had been 4 voters I would have been happy. The rest is gravy. However, I didn't expect, that with that many views, so few would have the balls, like jennypie, to actually vote.


Posted by Cosmic Fur on Feb-03-2007 00:02:

quote:
Originally posted by Nostrum
That's not the reason for the weak results. It's likely because most don't know what "Ambiguous" means.


We should put "nostrum's posts" in the definition of it.


Posted by Cosmic Fur on Feb-03-2007 00:04:

To be honest, I didn't vote cause there was one option missing - "Gender confusing = doesn't mean jack shit". I would have voted for that one.


Posted by Nostrum on Feb-03-2007 00:10:

quote:
Originally posted by Cosmic Fur
To be honest, I didn't vote cause there was one option missing - "Gender confusing = doesn't mean jack shit". I would have voted for that one.


Actually, your right. I did need a control but as I said I have not done one before and there was a point of no return. Believe it or not, I thought at the time to ask your opinion in the matter. But as many things in life, you just have to operate within the scope of the task at hand. If you try to change the scope, you have missed the point all together. Besides giving peeps a cop out option wouldn't have been as interesting.

I say the the # of peeps that didn't vote = the # of peeps that would have picket the "Gender confusing = doesn't mean jack shit" option.

PS: How do you like my Bash-kit? LOL I had to!!!
LOL- How do you like them apples!!! hahaha


Posted by Silky Johnson on Feb-03-2007 00:16:

quote:
Originally posted by Nostrum
Edit: The purpose of this poll has more then served it's self for me. If there had been 4 voters I would have been happy. The rest is gravy. However, I didn't expect, that with that many views, so few would have the balls, like jennypie, to actually vote.




Your first language isn't English, is it? You really need to learn how to use a comma properly.


And I DID vote. Unless you're commenting on my big hairy King Kong balls, in which case yes, my balls are huger than everyone else's.


Posted by Cosmic Fur on Feb-03-2007 00:17:

quote:
Originally posted by jennypie
Your first language isn't English, is it? You really need to learn how to use a comma properly.


And I DID vote. Unless you're commenting on my big hairy King Kong balls, in which case yes, my balls are huger than everyone else's.


Jenny, i'm looking forward the day we meet so I get to play with your big balls.


Posted by Nostrum on Feb-03-2007 00:20:

quote:
Originally posted by Cosmic Fur
We should put "nostrum's posts" in the definition of it.



C'mon, you know better then that. You can't use 'the word' in the definition description of 'that word'. No a picture on the other hand. You could use my bash-kit


Posted by Cosmic Fur on Feb-03-2007 00:21:

quote:
Originally posted by Nostrum
C'mon, you know better then that. You can't use 'the word' in the definition description of 'that word'.


If Simpsons can do it, so can I.


Posted by neuromancer on Feb-03-2007 00:22:

quote:
Originally posted by Nostrum
That's not the reason for the weak results. It's likely because most don't know what "Ambiguous" means.



ambiguous is a very ambiguous term.


Posted by Nostrum on Feb-03-2007 00:23:

quote:
Originally posted by Cosmic Fur
Jenny, i'm looking forward the day we meet so I get to play with your big balls.


OMG! Please don't tell me that I was the reason that you changed your avatar!!?? I thought that my post alleviating you from persecution would have shielded you from scrutiny.

I like the new one just the same however.


Posted by Cosmic Fur on Feb-03-2007 00:26:

quote:
Originally posted by Nostrum
OMG! Please don't tell me that I was the reason that you changed your avatar!!?? I thought that my post alleviating you from persecution would have shielded you from scrutiny.

I like the new one just the same however.


No, read the "comment on the avatar of the person above you" thread. Last page.


Posted by Silky Johnson on Feb-03-2007 00:28:

I changed my avatar too. What do you guys think?


Posted by Cosmic Fur on Feb-03-2007 00:30:

It's a little dark.


Posted by Silky Johnson on Feb-03-2007 00:31:

quote:
Originally posted by Cosmic Fur
It's a little dark.




That's racist!


Posted by Nostrum on Feb-03-2007 00:31:

quote:
Originally posted by jennypie
Your first language isn't English, is it? You really need to learn how to use a comma properly.


And I DID vote. Unless you're commenting on my big hairy King Kong balls, in which case yes, my balls are huger than everyone else's.


Ya, very clever. Nah, it's purely out of a lack of zeel and intensity when posting here now. My acumen not withstanding and 'that' as a silly reason for your comprehension skills,(comma) if you can recognize the fact that they're missing, insert at will and stop busting my balls over senseless crap.


Posted by Silky Johnson on Feb-03-2007 00:34:

quote:
Originally posted by Nostrum
Ya, very clever. Nah, it's purely out of a lack of zeel and intensity when posting here now. My acumen not withstanding and 'that' as a silly reason for your comprehension skills,(comma) if you can recognize the fact that they're missing, insert at will and stop busting my balls over senseless crap.





Do you wear glasses?


Posted by Nostrum on Feb-03-2007 00:35:

quote:
Originally posted by Cosmic Fur
No, read the "comment on the avatar of the person above you" thread. Last page.


Got it. LOL


Posted by Nostrum on Feb-03-2007 00:36:

quote:
Originally posted by jennypie
Do you wear glasses?



OK, this should be good.

No, why...


C'mon hemi half guy, out with it.


Posted by *~LiSa-LoO~* on Feb-03-2007 00:38:

Re: Just so everyone knows....

quote:
Originally posted by Nostrum
why all of the gender confusing Avatars?


Can you please tell me how the fuck do these answer options answer that question?

Gender confusing = Gay/Les
Gender confusing = Strait
Gender confusing = Closet
Gender confusing = Sexually Ambiguous

~Edit~
Either the question should be: What is your definition of gener confusing?

Or the answers should be something like this:
1. There's a lot of people that don't know what their sexual preference is
2. There's a lot of people that don't know if they are male or female
3. Nostrum is an idiot, just ignore this poll


Posted by Cosmic Fur on Feb-03-2007 00:39:

Oh Lisa, you keep trying.


Posted by Nostrum on Feb-03-2007 00:49:

Re: Re: Just so everyone knows....

quote:
Originally posted by *~LiSa-LoO~*
Can you please tell me how the fuck do these answer options answer that question?

Gender confusing = Gay/Les
Gender confusing = Strait
Gender confusing = Closet
Gender confusing = Sexually Ambiguous


It is a passive way of getting popular opinion. The scope has to be limited and assuming that those "with" gender confusing avatars are known by enough peeps "without", then it would generate a much more accurate result. By posing it to those "with' 'GCAs', I would be basing it solely on their accurate and honest interpretation of there own avatar. There for, nobody else in the forum would have an opportunity to participate. You would have 10 peeps voting vs. the rest of the forum.

This way, those that do have GCA's can see how the rest of the forum veiws them. Which really is the point isn't it? OK? Clear as mud?


Posted by *~LiSa-LoO~* on Feb-03-2007 00:51:

Re: Re: Re: Just so everyone knows....

quote:
Originally posted by Nostrum
It is a passive way of getting popular opinion. The scope has to be limited and assuming that those "with" gender confusing avatars are known by enough peeps "without", then it would generate a much more accurate result. By posing it to those "with' 'GCAs', I would be basing it solely on their accurate and honest interpretation of there own avatar. There for, nobody else in the forum would have an opportunity to participate. You would have 10 peeps voting vs. the rest of the forum.

This way, those that do have GCA's can see how the rest of the forum veiws them. Which really is the point isn't it? OK? Clear as mud?


Apparently you don't understand what I'm saying.

You're asking a "WHY" question, and having the answers available being the "DEFINITION OF A WORD"


Posted by Nostrum on Feb-03-2007 00:52:

quote:
Originally posted by neuromancer
ambiguous is a very ambiguous term.


Not in that context


Posted by Nostrum on Feb-03-2007 00:53:

quote:
Originally posted by jennypie
Do you wear glasses?



How is that going for you anyway?


Pages (4): « 1 2 [3] 4 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.