Windows 2000 Pro or XP? - TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Polls - Everything Else...
-- Windows 2000 Pro or XP?
Pages (3): « 1 2 [3]

Posted by TeKnoHe@d2025 on Sep-01-2002 01:09:

I'm running XP and loving every minute of it. Before I was on '98 and crashing hard drives left and right...since I've been on XP I haven't crashed a single one yet (knock on wood).

Posted by Lira on Sep-02-2002 05:08:

quote:
Originally posted by Nightmonger
I won't vote 'cause they both are shite.
Get a real os like Linux or BeOs and just keep win98 if you like to play games and stuff.

Micro$hit stuff sux BiG time.

Totally agree - upgrading from Win95 to Win98 was so traumatic that I'd rather keep my Win98 instead of installing those newer versions.

Posted by Hi-Voltage on Sep-04-2002 20:36:

quote:
Originally posted by dj_s_harrison
I have Win ME, but im thinking of getting XP Pro. Y'all reckon its worth it?

me too
Win ME suxxx I have to reinstall this shit or get an XP

Posted by Survion on Sep-05-2002 12:22:

None! I don�t like both, although my computer is fast enough to use XP...
I still use Win98 and i�m contend

Posted by DJ Dowlz on Sep-12-2002 13:35:

My biggest congratulations go out to the marketing team at Microsoft for convincing all of the people who've opened up their wallets to upgrade to an inferior operating system. 2000 hasn't crashed in 3 years of usage. Enough said.

Posted by DJ Mikey Mike on Oct-02-2002 00:39:

i vote XP. altho there are some flaws that i do not like, it still makes my computer run very smoothly (even tho i only hav 128 ram) and i havnt had a blue screen, or any errors since ive installed.

Posted by Ste on Oct-03-2002 22:53:

hahaha neither! im sitll rocking it in the free world with windows 98, but ive seen many a hard drive wiped by XP, and anyway all the fanct gfx would weigh down my resources, to what aint broek i wont fix!

Posted by Linx_da_cat on Oct-03-2002 23:38:

why would i change from 2000? it's like a million times more stable than xp and it's less resource hungry.

i just assembled a new computer for my cousin that's livin' with me now and she wanted xp but i installed 2000 instead. it'll always be better than xp.

Posted by Stanza on Oct-04-2002 06:13:

Windows 2000 of course. Don't look like the look of XP. Hogs up too many resources and memory. My Windows is fine, very very stable, the way I like it

Posted by webbie on Oct-07-2002 11:42:

XP, moved directly from 98 to XP and what a difference, yikes.

Posted by Dj-Steve on Nov-24-2002 14:15:

Both of these kiss my arse. 98 sec edition! weee!

Posted by decode on Nov-24-2002 17:40:

Xp looks nicer but 2k is far better.
The first release of 2k was shite but once its been patched up to service pack 3 its the best OS i ever used imo.
Xp crashes, too many fucking bugs and it takes shit loads of memory for useless shite.
2k all the way.

Pages (3): « 1 2 [3]