TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Canada - Toronto & Southern Ont.
-- How many of the guys here are Jewish
Pages (7): « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 »

being Jewish down there so much sexier.

quote:

Originally posted by drgoodvibe UN Study says circumsicion "significantly" reduces Aids infection.. http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.a...Cr=hiv&Cr1=aids

quote:

Male circumcision has major potential for the prevention of HIV infection,� WHO HIV/AIDS Department Director Kevin De Cock added

AHAHAHAHAHA. Oh this is just too good.

quote:

Originally posted by drgoodvibe UN Study says circumsicion "significantly" reduces Aids infection.. http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.a...Cr=hiv&Cr1=aids

how bout this though....

....."but early results suggest the procedure may put women at increased risk of infection, according to preliminary data presented on Tuesday."


SOURCE

quote:

Originally posted by jennypie DAMN JEWWWSSSS!!! *shakes fist at the sky*

Jenny, you're my favourite.
Strangely, when I say this I get in shit.

Come on now, I know you want one, so here's a *high five*.

quote:

Originally posted by Dr. DAS Jenny, you're my favourite. Strangely, when I say this I get in shit. Come on now, I know you want one, so here's a *high five*.

Wait for people to get to know you first, otherwise we can't tell if you're sarcastic or not or joking or whatever.

quote:

Originally posted by StereoPrincess this poll is retarded.

hah woot!

quote:

Originally posted by Abercrombie Wait for people to get to know you first, otherwise we can't tell if you're sarcastic or not or joking or whatever.

Actually, I was referencing a converstation from another thread (What do you say when you stub your toe), where Jenny's 'Damn Jews' spawns from.

Also, I agree that posting removes the ability to determine if someone is joking, but surely you're able to tell based loosely on context.

I mean come on, I'd have to have to have a serious set on me to be openly anti-semetic if I was serious...let's all try and remember that this is supposed to be fun.

quote:

Originally posted by Dr. DAS that this is supposed to be fun.

Fun is serious, serious business.

quote:

Originally posted by Cosmic Fur Not *always*. I've heard of people doing it for non-religious reasons too (stating health, hygiene, and appearance reasons). I think a lot of male pornstars are circumcized?

how rare is that tho? mostly guys don't sign up to cut up their dick once they have lived with it for years and years.

I think the age that we are, a large percentage of parents opted for the surgery.

it's just much better.

quote:

P.S. The reason for this thread lies in another thread.

lol. each thread holds on it's own. and this one is not holding.

everybody has a jew inside of them...
yes yes i like to save my money too....

quote:

Originally posted by StereoPrincess it's just much better.

How do you qualify that? Your preference?

It has been proven that there are no distinct health or hygene benefits associated with circumcision. In fact, I remember reading somewhere that the opposite is true because foreskin acts as a natural guard against outside influences.

Also, I believe that being a turtleneck makes for better sex due to the sensitivity of the head and the gliding action of the skin.

This is just another medical myth, like getting your tonsils out.
Does nothing.

quote:

Originally posted by StereoPrincess lol. each thread holds on it's own. and this one is not holding.

It's at 2 pages already, so I'd say it's holding quite well. Anyway, if intelligence level of this thread does not appease you, perhaps you can entertain yourself with the other, much more informative and useful polls TOTA has to offer.

quote:

Originally posted by Cosmic Fur It's at 2 pages already, so I'd say it's holding quite well. Anyway, if intelligence level of this thread does not appease you, perhaps you can entertain yourself with the other, much more informative and useful polls TOTA has to offer.

Like the 'how much would you pay to see a kick-ass headliner' poll.

FTW.

quote:

Originally posted by Dr. DAS How do you qualify that? Your preference? It has been proven that there are no distinct health or hygene benefits associated with circumcision. In fact, I remember reading somewhere that the opposite is true because foreskin acts as a natural guard against outside influences. Also, I believe that being a turtleneck makes for better sex due to the sensitivity of the head and the gliding action of the skin. This is just another medical myth, like getting your tonsils out. Does nothing.

with increased sensitivity comes quick sex sessions

i rather have longer sex sessions!

quote:

Originally posted by Abercrombie Wait for people to get to know you first, otherwise we can't tell if you're sarcastic or not or joking or whatever.

Heh, nah I'm not a retard like that. I'm surprisingly good at understanding people's context when they post on the internet. And yeah, I knew what he meant.

quote:

Originally posted by PurpleHaze with increased sensitivity comes quick sex sessions

yeah only if you have precum sindrome..lol

quote:

Originally posted by Dr. DAS How do you qualify that?

None of your business.

quote:

Originally posted by Dr. DAS It has been proven that there are no distinct health or hygene benefits associated with circumcision.

You are wrong. http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.a...Cr=hiv&Cr1=aids

quote:

Originally posted by rabbitjoker None of your business. You are wrong. http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.a...Cr=hiv&Cr1=aids

From a global perspective, specifically in developing countries, this may be an effective tool to prevent male aquisition of the HIV virus. However, there is little in the way of safe sex education available in these parts, and I'm sure even less inclination to practice it. Let's face it, in a society with such a wealth of information and education available, you should not be having unprotected sex outside of a relationship, and if you do and you develop HIV as a result - you had it coming sunshine.

A report filed this year by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC marks circumcision as "non-therapeutic and medically unnecessary intervention.". I agree, circumcision of a healthy infant is tantamount to mutilation. If this is your religious practice, then so be it.

The guide for physicians continues, "Current consensus of medical opinion, including that of the Canadian and American Paediatric Societies and the American Urological Society, is that there is insufficient evidence that these benefits outweigh the potential risks. That is, routine infant male circumcision, i.e. routine removal of normal tissue in a healthy infant, is not recommended."

You can read the article here: https://www.cpsbc.ca/cps/physician_...nual/malecircum

To paraphrase this report further "our understanding of medical practice must change as research findings become available", and what may be an appropriate tool to combat the spread of HIV/AIDS in the developing world with a serious problem concerning these infections, may not apply to a society such as ours.

Wrong? That's a bold statement to make without exploring all of the research available.

Now who else wants a piece of me?

This thread is useless without pics!!!

quote:

Originally posted by rabbitjoker Fun is serious, serious business.

quote:

Originally posted by MarkT This thread is useless without pics!!!

Let's try and avoid making EVERY thread NSFW.

quote:

Originally posted by Jeff Button

You am bad with grammar.

quote:

Originally posted by Dr. DAS Wrong? That's a bold statement to make without exploring all of the research available.

No. You're wrong.

http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news...4/en/index.html

The only why you won't be wrong is if you can show more current (research published after the above) information saying that circumcision is not beneficial in prevention of the spread of HIV.

You're BOTH wrong!

quote:

Originally posted by jennypie You're BOTH wrong!

Maybe. Just maybe.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.