TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Production Studio
-- lead synths
Pages (8): « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 »


Posted by Mr.Mystery on Apr-24-2007 16:59:

quote:
Originally posted by CODY JONES
can you not read im CODY J and and im talking about you and your comments in this thread to toward the thread starter calling him an idiot with your first post in this topic

No, I can't read your incoherent ramblings actually. They don't seem to make any sense.

quote:

who the hell are you may i ask?..you seem to go around this site causing trouble towards people that put up threads that you dont like....WHY?

Generalising is fun, isn't it. Just put me on ignore or something, I know that's what I'm doing to you.


Posted by CODY JONES on Apr-24-2007 17:39:

quote:
Originally posted by Mr.Mystery
No, I can't read your incoherent ramblings actually. They don't seem to make any sense.


Generalising is fun, isn't it. Just put me on ignore or something, I know that's what I'm doing to you.


they make total sense if you ask me,people just have to read over your posts in this thread..your very first post you called rubez an idiot? did you or did you not?

your posts are a childish and silly..i think you go around this site looking for attention off people.....the way you go about doing it,is by slagging off people..

what is wrong with the thread he started?

do you run this site?

what questions would you like people to ask in future so there will be no more fights?

what gives you the rite to call him an idiot?


Posted by jey on Apr-24-2007 17:51:

lol emotional people on this forum!!


Posted by ASFSE on Apr-24-2007 18:00:

quote:
Originally posted by CODY JONES
they make total sense if you ask me,people just have to read over your posts in this thread..your very first post you called rubez an idiot? did you or did you not?

your posts are a childish and silly..i think you go around this site looking for attention off people.....the way you go about doing it,is by slagging off people..

what is wrong with the thread he started?

do you run this site?

what questions would you like people to ask in future so there will be no more fights?

what gives you the rite to call him an idiot?


well rubez is an idiot because a majority of his questions could have been answered by reading the stickies.

in regards to ppl asking questions that will end the "fighting"...READ THE STICKIES....or use the SEARCH...and BE SPECIFIC.

and "slagging off" people is fun dude, try it sometime.


Posted by CODY JONES on Apr-24-2007 18:11:

quote:
Originally posted by ASFSE
well rubez is an idiot because a majority of his questions could have been answered by reading the stickies.

in regards to ppl asking questions that will end the "fighting"...READ THE STICKIES....or use the SEARCH...and BE SPECIFIC.

and "slagging off" people is fun dude, try it sometime.


and who are you SLAPHEAD why is rubez an idiot?

if everybody read the stickies then there be no therads getting started...thats all we here out of people like you and mr mystery.use the stickies

ASK ME,,,,,,,,,TEDDY-RUCKS-BIN.


Posted by CODY JONES on Apr-24-2007 18:11:

quote:
Originally posted by jey
lol emotional people on this forum!!


i have a point here

its not emotional.


Posted by mysticalninja on Apr-24-2007 20:19:

quote:
Originally posted by flutlicht junky
Pls lets not have any more dj tiesticles pls

If you don't wanna answer rubez questions then don't.




jerks


Posted by substorm on Apr-24-2007 20:24:

quote:
Originally posted by CODY JONES
i have a point here

its not emotional.


Uhmm, seems verry much so... ! sensative... we dont know you and you dont know us. So why do you expect us to take all these stupid questions with open arms?

I agree that its aloud to post questions.. however, most of us that has been here for a while and shared our thoughts and experience has given most of our questions alot thought before posting. I mean these questions that this dude is asking is just pointless for him and irritating for the rest, cus the aswers are everywhere, and i mean EVERYWHERE.

Give and THEN take, thats a good start. OR ask something that could actully be something to ask about.

This is a forum, not the local EDM producer support! if you wanna learn, then read and do, and when you really really get stuck, google it first then ask!

And that making as decent track takes most of the time years! And for us that have spend alot of time reading and reading and listening and learning by doing and reding more.. testing etc etc!

And someone comes in and say like... how do i make a bassline... how do i make a lead... what is an equalizer...WTF!! you are just begging to be flamed...

Cheers
C


Posted by CODY JONES on Apr-24-2007 21:10:

quote:
Originally posted by substorm
Uhmm, seems verry much so... ! sensative... we dont know you and you dont know us. So why do you expect us to take all these stupid questions with open arms?

I agree that its aloud to post questions.. however, most of us that has been here for a while and shared our thoughts and experience has given most of our questions alot thought before posting. I mean these questions that this dude is asking is just pointless for him and irritating for the rest, cus the aswers are everywhere, and i mean EVERYWHERE.

Give and THEN take, thats a good start. OR ask something that could actully be something to ask about.

This is a forum, not the local EDM producer support! if you wanna learn, then read and do, and when you really really get stuck, google it first then ask!

And that making as decent track takes most of the time years! And for us that have spend alot of time reading and reading and listening and learning by doing and reding more.. testing etc etc!

And someone comes in and say like... how do i make a bassline... how do i make a lead... what is an equalizer...WTF!! you are just begging to be flamed...

Cheers
C


i cans see where your comin from with your post,but why does mr mystery always have to be so smart???

can you answer that or can he even??

he's gone hiding again when somebody puts it up to him!


Posted by Nudge XS on Apr-24-2007 22:16:

this is better than trisha!!


Posted by ASFSE on Apr-24-2007 22:35:

quote:
Originally posted by CODY JONES
but why does mr mystery always have to be so smart???


maybe you're new to the forum and you dont understand? just maybe?


Posted by Roberttodd on Apr-25-2007 00:03:

Re: lead synths

quote:
Originally posted by rubez
i was reading the tutorial on synths. i gather from it that a lead synth sound is made from multiple frequencies (/or oscillators?) together bouncing off each at the same time at different pitches.(detuned?)

(im using albino) can it create say 6 different frequencies at the same time, or do i need to load the same synth 6 times and adjust the pitch of them all and then layer them together? thanks


The original Supersaw waveshape made popular by Ferry Corsten, Rank 1 and others is what you are talking about i think. As featured in the JP-8000.the waveshape was made by taking seven sawtooth waves and detuning them from each other very slightly.
I dont know much about the synth you are talking about, but try Z3TA+, the JP is not difficult to emulate, but is difficult to emulate well.


Posted by Roberttodd on Apr-25-2007 00:26:

Re: Re: lead synths

quote:
Originally posted by Roberttodd
The original Supersaw waveshape made popular by Ferry Corsten, Rank 1 and others is what you are talking about i think. As featured in the JP-8000.the waveshape was made by taking seven sawtooth waves and detuning them from each other very slightly.
I dont know much about the synth you are talking about, but try Z3TA+, the JP is not difficult to emulate, but is difficult to emulate well.


actually thought i better clear a few more things up.

JP-8000 = hardware synth manufactured by Roland
Z3TA+ =good software synth manufactured by RGC audio.

an oscillator is not the same as a frequency, an oscillator is a simple device which generates 2 variables, shape and frequency. a frequency is a measure of the oscillators speed. or the speed of a sound waves cyclic vibration.

your goal = to combine seven sawtooth waves, but detune each one progressivly more than the previous one.

The sawtooth waves do not 'bounce off each other' more like 'sit on top of each other'.

You are not in the realm of layering synths when trying to emulate the JP your more in the realm of layering oscillators.

You may wish to layer synths if the synth you are using does not have enough oscillators to create a viable supersaw.

Simply select the waveform for each osc to generate this should be sawtooth.

leave the first osc alone but with the next osc increase the cent value to 2

increase next osc cent value to 4 and next osc to 6 and so on with your seven oscs.

see if this 2 cent step thing is working, if not try a 3 cent gap or more cent gap see what sounds good.

when you have your oscs set up nice, find a good filter setting use a lowpass filter.

set up the amp envelope to somthing nice (your gonna have to learn all this shit yourself)

ferry always used a filter envelope setting to add character, so set up your filter envelope nice.

ferry often used some kind of frequency modulation, so set up your LFO nice.

add some effects.

EQ is essential.

delay is essential.

reverb is essential.

that should keep you busy for now. sorry about the grammer folks, but like that dude said, its not an english lesson and i cant be assed.



you will find a way to combine


Posted by echosystm on Apr-25-2007 02:31:

quote:
Originally posted by CODY JONES
what gives you the rite to call him an idiot?


Because he is.
Who has the nerve to say something is "toss" when they don't even know what it is? An idiot.
Who says something is a toy when countless top 10 tracks have been made from it? An idiot.

People don't like to waste their time on idiots that won't listen. It's like having sand kicked in your face when you're trying to help; the forum is better off without them. Someone who acts like a know it all and starts controversy, when they obviously don't know shit, deserves to get cut down. And that is exactly what happened.


Posted by Mr.Mystery on Apr-25-2007 07:38:

I find it puzzling how he's allowed to call me out but apparently I have no right to do the same. That Cody fellow seems to have some obsession over me anyway... it's a bit scary.


Posted by rubez on Apr-25-2007 10:22:

thanks Roberttodd. useful stuff there, least you arent stuck up enough to share what u know, instead of these useless pricks.. i did read the stickies, but other opinions, put differently and from their point of view are helpful.. stick to the topic or fuck the fuck up - your wasting EVERYBODIES time.. u just itch to jump in oooh n00b question.. big deal, do we honestly need to hear it?? i didnt realise this was a proffesional forum, where do the non-genuis questions go?

do u think u have seniority here or something? if i see a thread on here, which doesnt interest me, i leave it the fuck alone.. are u people trying on purpose to be arseholes? just like u dont want to hear my idiot questions, i dont want to hear your idiot fucking POINTLESS ramblings. i got what i wanted -in the end- from my question on this thread.. but did it need to span 6 pages??


Posted by echosystm on Apr-25-2007 12:04:

quote:
Originally posted by rubez
thanks Roberttodd. useful stuff there, least you arent stuck up enough to share what u know, instead of these useless pricks.. i did read the stickies, but other opinions, put differently and from their point of view are helpful.. stick to the topic or fuck the fuck up - your wasting EVERYBODIES time.. u just itch to jump in oooh n00b question.. big deal, do we honestly need to hear it?? i didnt realise this was a proffesional forum, where do the non-genuis questions go?

do u think u have seniority here or something? if i see a thread on here, which doesnt interest me, i leave it the fuck alone.. are u people trying on purpose to be arseholes? just like u dont want to hear my idiot questions, i dont want to hear your idiot fucking POINTLESS ramblings. i got what i wanted -in the end- from my question on this thread.. but did it need to span 6 pages??


If you use a bit of emotional intelligence and pull your head out of your ass, I think you will see the replies were perfectly productive until you started saying things were toys and acting like a right moron. I will do a breakdown of the posts if you can't see it for yourself.

Let me know if you need any help.

EDIT: Just to be clear... Vanguard is a great piece of software which has been used in countless top dance songs, you just have no idea how to use it. People who have gone out and bought that software would find that irritating. How would you feel if you just bought a brand new Mustang and someone who doesn't even know what an engine is came along saying it was shit? You dug yourself even deeper into the shit by replying agressively.

Get some sense, or get out of the forum. I can guarantee a ban is inevitable unless you grow up.


Posted by rubez on Apr-25-2007 14:15:

u compare vanguard to a mustang? a mustang is a beast.. vanguard isnt a high end piece of kit like a mustang; its at the other end of the scale.

just to be clear: vanguard is cheap. its oversimplified. everything is presets. u cant manipulate it nearly half as much its 'rivals'. and it has a pretty gui for idiots like u to understand. no credible producer would shout about usuing this peice of shit. its even marketed as 'ideal for beginners'. the countless 'dance hits' made with vanguard come from knobhead bedroom producers. much like yourself.


Posted by flutlicht junky on Apr-25-2007 15:15:

Actually it is used by alot of ppl, ive heard its familiar distorted rasping tones on quite a few tracks.

And my friend who has done engineering for some well known names has used on a couple of tracks and it does sound awesome when used well.


Posted by G-Con on Apr-25-2007 15:20:

quote:
Originally posted by rubez
u compare vanguard to a mustang? a mustang is a beast.. vanguard isnt a high end piece of kit like a mustang; its at the other end of the scale.

just to be clear: vanguard is cheap. its oversimplified. everything is presets. u cant manipulate it nearly half as much its 'rivals'. and it has a pretty gui for idiots like u to understand. no credible producer would shout about usuing this peice of shit. its even marketed as 'ideal for beginners'. the countless 'dance hits' made with vanguard come from knobhead bedroom producers. much like yourself.


how can you give an opinion on it when you don't understand synthesis yet. You dont know how to create whatever type of sound you fancy. You lack the knowledge and expertise to master any synth.

Only when you have better skills and experience can you possibly comment on how good a synth is...


Posted by rubez on Apr-25-2007 15:22:

quote:
Originally posted by flutlicht junky
Actually it is used by alot of ppl, ive heard its familiar distorted rasping tones on quite a few tracks.

And my friend who has done engineering for some well known names has used on a couple of tracks and it does sound awesome when used well.


any simple product used well by someone who knows what their doing will still end up with great results. there is freeware thats could hold its own against professional stuff. its just on the scale of things vanguard is rather crap.


Posted by rubez on Apr-25-2007 15:27:

quote:
Originally posted by G-Con
how can you give an opinion on it when you don't understand synthesis yet. You dont know how to create whatever type of sound you fancy. You lack the knowledge and expertise to master any synth.

Only when you have better skills and experience can you possibly comment on how good a synth is...


i know its a limited product. am i wrong?

i cant imagine any expert raving about vanguard, doesnt mean there isnt good examples of trance using vanguard.


Posted by flutlicht junky on Apr-25-2007 15:53:

Most of the old analogue synths that ppl rave about are simple beasts, but their secret is their sound of which a huge part is played by their osc's

Vanguard definitely has a sound that is unique among its peers, this is what makes it useful.

Most sounds you need when making a tune will be of the standard variety e.g saw lead, square bass etc. Your weird leads and effects might not be able to be made with vanguard but it doesn't matter. You use vanguard to make certain sounds not all the sounds in your tunes.


Posted by CODY JONES on Apr-25-2007 15:56:

quote:
Originally posted by echosystm
Because he is.
Who has the nerve to say something is "toss" when they don't even know what it is? An idiot.
Who says something is a toy when countless top 10 tracks have been made from it? An idiot.

People don't like to waste their time on idiots that won't listen. It's like having sand kicked in your face when you're trying to help; the forum is better off without them. Someone who acts like a know it all and starts controversy, when they obviously don't know shit, deserves to get cut down. And that is exactly what happened.


whats your problem?

how the fuck is he an idiot may i ask you? because he asked a question you did'nt like?


Posted by DeZmA on Apr-25-2007 16:41:

quote:
Originally posted by rubez
i know its a limited product. am i wrong?

i cant imagine any expert raving about vanguard, doesnt mean there isnt good examples of trance using vanguard.

Synthation are experts and they made a nice sounding soundset for it. If you're asking for help on a forum you might try and listen to the more experienced members.


Pages (8): « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.