TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- BT, as seen by Ishkur
Pages (5): « 1 2 [3] 4 5 »


Posted by woscar on Oct-23-2007 01:38:

Every time I read the word "Ishkur", my mood changes into this:


Posted by Nostalgic on Oct-23-2007 02:25:

ishkur is god, everything he says is right, i'd lick his balls


Posted by sean5 on Oct-23-2007 02:53:

how is BT not catchy? unless we are talking strictly non-vocal, i don't even think there is an argument.


Posted by thoughtlessjex on Oct-23-2007 06:04:

quote:
Originally posted by SMC
"Boring" is highly subjective, and so is "compelling".

Let's have a "hypothetical" situation where the two are antonyms. I'll even let you say what music is compelling and what is boring, to fit with your condition of subjectiveness. Do you listen to compelling or boring music, in your opinion?

If you find it compelling, then your music would definitely contain a hook of some kind. Whatever you find compelling about the track: that's probably the hook! Or one of them, as the case may be.

If you find it boring, then why are you listening to it anyway?

Now, in keeping with your whole idea of subjectiveness, I find BT's dance music boring, by and large. A large majority of it lacks something I find to be a compelling hook, by what I've laid out here as a hook. I don't see how you can take issue with such a critique on anything more than the basis of opinion, and if you care all that much about subjectiveness, then I don't think you really have no basis whatsoever to try to discount what I've said here.


Posted by distant on Oct-23-2007 06:37:

Ishkur's got a point. I already hate plastic-y perfection to begin with (see: trance anno 2007), but on top of that BT tries to pass it off as art without having anything real going on in the first place. I actually can't remember what most of his tracks sound like, except Flaming June.

What pops into my mind is that time Madonna was talking about Aphex Twin and "Electronica", and you could tell she was just saying it to add credibility. That's what BT does. All this "experimentation" and "abstract concepts" to prove a point that isn't there.

P.S. What the fuck is with that Ableton video? What a ****.

EDIT: For more pretentiousness, find the video of Blu Mar Ten demonstrating a track off their new album in Reason 3. Give it a rest guys, you don't need any more fucking layers! And enough with the bloody world music samples.


Posted by bamski on Oct-23-2007 07:01:

quote:
Originally posted by woscar99
Every time I read the word "Ishkur", my mood changes into this:


I'm gonna have to go with the minority on this one.. I understand people having issues with Ishkur, i have my own too. But when people read his guide they're always only focusing on the negative, and miss the good points he's making, we (or atleast myself) have to give it to him though, he works hard as hell, and imo he's more oppinionated than a straight up prick.. To the best of my knowledge he doesn't start war's, The people who can't try to see the positive aspects of his posts start them..

I think i should shut up now


Posted by ninetyninej on Oct-23-2007 07:55:



^this tool couldn't produce his way out of a paper bag and he thinks he's an authority on 'musical talent'?

pffffft


Posted by distant on Oct-23-2007 08:11:

quote:
Originally posted by ninetyninej
^this tool couldn't produce his way out of a paper bag and he thinks he's an authority on 'musical talent'?

pffffft


What you're saying is that if a chef serves up a pile of steaming cow dung, as a customer you're not allowed to complain. Why don't you sod off?


Posted by Sykonee on Oct-23-2007 10:30:

quote:
Originally posted by distant
What you're saying is that if a chef serves up a pile of steaming cow dung...

I'm almost certain that's considered a delicacy somewhere.


Posted by saluyamo on Oct-23-2007 12:14:

quote:
Originally posted by ninetyninej


^this tool couldn't produce his way out of a paper bag and he thinks he's an authority on 'musical talent'?

pffffft


Ishkur didnt say he was a bad producer, he said that BT focuses on the technology involved rather than the actual song.


Posted by sean5 on Oct-23-2007 12:22:

quote:
Originally posted by distant
What you're saying is that if a chef serves up a pile of steaming cow dung, as a customer you're not allowed to complain. Why don't you sod off?


but if the customers knowledge of food only extends into chicken fingers and french fries, and the chef is preparing a rare fish only found in the seas off the coast of japan then can you really take the customer seriously? anyone is ALLOWED to judge, but personally i only accept judgements from those equally qualified.


Posted by basilisk on Oct-23-2007 13:48:

That must have taken a little while to put together...


Posted by iMatt on Oct-23-2007 15:34:

Shame / Disagreement

i've always been a fan of BT, but its like listening to a symphany really, pleasing to hear in the background, but as probably mention earlier, his drum work needs a bit of a rather helping hand...YAY FOR 808 Loops


Posted by SMC on Oct-23-2007 15:52:

quote:
Originally posted by thoughtlessjex
Let's have a "hypothetical" situation where the two are antonyms. I'll even let you say what music is compelling and what is boring, to fit with your condition of subjectiveness. Do you listen to compelling or boring music, in your opinion?

If you find it compelling, then your music would definitely contain a hook of some kind. Whatever you find compelling about the track: that's probably the hook! Or one of them, as the case may be.

If you find it boring, then why are you listening to it anyway?

Now, in keeping with your whole idea of subjectiveness, I find BT's dance music boring, by and large. A large majority of it lacks something I find to be a compelling hook, by what I've laid out here as a hook. I don't see how you can take issue with such a critique on anything more than the basis of opinion, and if you care all that much about subjectiveness, then I don't think you really have no basis whatsoever to try to discount what I've said here.


What i had a problem with was the idea that the presence of a (melodic) hook (a hook in the traditional sense), as an objective feature, is what determines whether a piece of music can be compelling to anyone. I can't stand that type of attitude where people present their taste and opinions as if they were facts, and now even great laws�.

The hook as you defined it is a completely different story and i can't disagree with any of what you said. I'm sure we find different things to be compelling, and as irrelevant as that may be, that's a bit of the point.


Posted by ninetyninej on Oct-23-2007 16:29:

quote:
Originally posted by distant
What you're saying is that if a chef serves up a pile of steaming cow dung, as a customer you're not allowed to complain. Why don't you sod off?


lol, the sheeple have spoken!


Posted by SPAWNmaster on Oct-23-2007 16:29:

I certainly did read the whole article but I suppose I didn't get my point across. While well-produced music doesn't necessarily mean good music in the case of TBU in my opinion, it is good music. That's all. I just happen to disagree because I like BT's music in addition to respecting his level of expertise. The first track on TBU I thought was great even though it was written entirely in CSound.


Posted by Ishkur on Oct-23-2007 16:31:

quote:
Originally posted by Clovis
As opposed to your amazingly concise and well structured rants?

He's not trying to prove a point, something you obviously missed...


I had a point to make, and I made it.


Posted by Space Marine on Oct-23-2007 16:33:

quote:
Originally posted by Ishkur
I had a point to make, and I made it.


Fuck off gimp. You didn't make shit.


Posted by ninetyninej on Oct-23-2007 16:38:

quote:
Originally posted by Ishkur
I had a point to make, and I made it.


So does Bush when he makes his speeches but we laugh at his ignorance too.

You both have a lot in common; stroking your own ego and basking in your own self-righteousness



/participation-in-the-goings-on-of-sheeple


Posted by Ishkur on Oct-23-2007 17:34:

quote:
Originally posted by Space Marine
Fuck off gimp. You didn't make shit.


You make an eloquent argument. I am intrigued by your ideas and wish to subscribe to your newsletter.


Posted by RJT on Oct-23-2007 17:48:

I love threads that revolve around Ishkur. So much hate.

Agree or disagree, whether you think he's a complete cunt or not, it's entertainment.


Posted by phyrrus on Oct-23-2007 17:49:

quote:
http://www.365mag.com/index.php?pg=spec&recnum=375&Title=Column%3A+Sean+Cusick+on+365Mag+International+Music+Magazine


I couldn't even get past the first paragraph where he claims that everyone BEGGED him to write it.


Posted by montana on Oct-23-2007 18:06:

people begged cusick to write it after he mentioned his dislike of bt's music in a previous column


Posted by Alex on Oct-23-2007 18:14:

quote:
Originally posted by RJT
Agree or disagree, whether you think he's a complete cunt or not,


Hahaha, yeah.

Ishkur vs Element-Y, lets make it happen.


Posted by plaxx on Oct-23-2007 18:33:

Ishkur should never be taken seriously...

BT is a musical genius. He's tries out things no one would ever dare to because they'd rather stick to what everyone else is doing. The technical process BT goes through is truly astounding and unique.

Also, where do you get off comparing BT to Ferry Corsten? Your article is merely a reflection of a recent infatuation with Ferry Corsten. Given, this is your personal view of the artist, but you're trying to bring it to a point to make whomever reads the article dislike BT.

The problem with the scene today are the Luddites who refuse to move forward, who refuse the embrace change but would rather bring up the epic 90's and Oakenfold's EM tour.

In my opinion, this is nothing but a poorly written article full of mediocre similes.

edit: Ishkur, you're not by any chance against ableton for djing are you?


Pages (5): « 1 2 [3] 4 5 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.