TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Australia
-- Rudd For Emperor
Pages (4): « 1 2 [3] 4 »


Posted by echosystm on Nov-18-2007 21:51:

quote:
Originally posted by DIDI
btw I've never understood the whingers re wind turbines , I think they look amazing!!


yeah me neither. they built a whole bunch of them near my beach house. i think they're cool. the local bumpkins were all shitty about it, but they got put in anyway.


Posted by Fledz on Nov-19-2007 07:11:

quote:
Originally posted by DIDI
It would be an array and there are not that many people driving around in the middle of the outback. It would certainly be better than driving pass a nuclear power station!

btw I've never understood the whingers re wind turbines , I think they look amazing!!


I believe it's because they are noisy, look bad (personal opinion), hazardous to wildlife, and really not that reliable.


Posted by Dj_Es-Dva on Nov-19-2007 10:22:

quote:
Originally posted by DIDI
It would be an array and there are not that many people driving around in the middle of the outback. It would certainly be better than driving pass a nuclear power station!

btw I've never understood the whingers re wind turbines , I think they look amazing!!

big +1!

As far as i know, they make no noise, move too slow to harm animals and look really nice imo!


Posted by Philby on Nov-19-2007 12:14:


rudd for emperor! he will not let this happen

quote:
Originally posted by Dj_Es-Dva
move too slow to harm animals


except the birds that get sucked into them lol


Posted by Aesthetic on Nov-19-2007 22:26:

also, they look pretty sweet when you're playing daytona usa

quote:
Originally posted by echosystm
yeah me neither. they built a whole bunch of them near my beach house. i think they're cool. the local bumpkins were all shitty about it, but they got put in anyway.


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Nov-19-2007 22:36:

quote:
Originally posted by Aesthetic
also, they look pretty sweet when you're playing daytona usa



Posted by echosystm on Nov-20-2007 11:09:

quote:
Originally posted by Fledz
hazardous to wildlife


wtf?


Posted by Philby on Nov-20-2007 11:46:

quote:
Originally posted by echosystm
wtf?



there are a few studies on how they impact on at least local bird populations


Posted by DIDI on Nov-20-2007 11:53:

quote:
Originally posted by Philby
there are a few studies on how they impact on at least local bird populations
Environment Victoria says modern turbines kill 1 or 2 birds a year.


Posted by DJ_Ballistic on Nov-20-2007 12:22:

quote:
Originally posted by DIDI
Environment Victoria says modern turbines kill 1 or 2 birds a year.


those 2 birds could mate and make more birds and those birds could make even more birds

so you see TURBINES KILL BILLIONS OF BIRDS EVERY YEAR!!!

If you find these numbers too shocking to be ignored, vote 1 Philbert J Fry at the next election and ensure 1 pigeon for every person in australia to shit on their heads by the year 2010.



wait, where am i? what just happened?


Posted by DIDI on Nov-20-2007 12:25:

quote:
Originally posted by DJ_Ballistic
those 2 birds could mate and make more birds and those birds could make even more birds

so you see TURBINES KILL BILLIONS OF BIRDS EVERY YEAR!!!

If you find these numbers too shocking to be ignored, vote 1 Philbert J Fry at the next election and ensure 1 pigeon for every person in australia to shit on their heads by the year 2010.



wait, where am i? what just happened?
And we end up with a Hitchcock film.


Posted by Philby on Nov-20-2007 12:27:

quote:
Originally posted by DIDI
Environment Victoria says modern turbines kill 1 or 2 birds a year.


i thought it was worse than that, at least thats what i remember from uni 5 years ago stupid brain


Posted by DIDI on Nov-20-2007 21:52:

quote:
Originally posted by Philby
i thought it was worse than that, at least thats what i remember from uni 5 years ago stupid brain
The turbines are better now.


Posted by echosystm on Nov-20-2007 21:59:

I'm pretty sure glass windows kill more birds per year than turbines.

BAN ON WINDOWS!


Posted by Aesthetic on Nov-20-2007 22:19:

i wish turbines would kill all the fucking flies.


Posted by Spang on Nov-22-2007 09:07:

I hope like hell history doesnt repeat itself.

When Billy McMahon was prime minister the country was going well and unemployment was the lowest it had ever been. For some unknown reason the mob decided it was time for a change and voted in Gough Whitlam, probably the worst PM we have ever had and totally destroyed all the good work that had been achieved up to that point.
It is only now that the country is back on track after that little excursion just for the sake of it.

The labor party in the 60's and 70's gave there prefences to the communist party because they had something in common. Not much has changed at all. Lets not forget that the same people who are running the labour party now all backed Mark Latham as there saviour. Same shit different day.

I dont agree with everything howard has done as i think the total control of both houses of parliment went to his head and he probably thought he would be up against Kim beazly in this election, a man he has been all over in the past. The anti terror laws are over the top and some aspects of work choices (ive read the whole 1200 page act) shouldn't be there but all the ads run by the unions and labor about stripping away workers pay and rights is just bullshit.

Our economy is the strongest it has been, our dollar is strong, unemployment is at a 33 year low and the country has no debt. Why vote against that?


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Nov-22-2007 09:18:

quote:
Originally posted by Spang
When Billy McMahon was prime minister the country was going well and unemployment was the lowest it had ever been. For some unknown reason the mob decided it was time for a change and voted in Gough Whitlam, probably the worst PM we have ever had and totally destroyed all the good work that had been achieved up to that point.


yeah, damn the free education!

quote:

The labor party in the 60's and 70's gave there prefences to the communist party because they had something in common. Not much has changed at all. Lets not forget that the same people who are running the labour party now all backed Mark Latham as there saviour. Same shit different day.


bullshit.

quote:

some aspects of work choices (ive read the whole 1200 page act) shouldn't be there but all the ads run by the unions and labor about stripping away workers pay and rights is just bullshit.


so all the studies conducted that show those on AWAs have fewer entitlements and less pay are wrong?

quote:

Our economy is the strongest it has been, our dollar is strong, unemployment is at a 33 year low and the country has no debt. Why vote against that?


our dollar is strong or the US dollar is weaker?


Posted by Spang on Nov-22-2007 09:27:

Prove what i said is wrong.

I dont care what anyone here says as i know that everytime i post something as has happened in the past, i get shut down, but everytime, at the end of the day, the libs get back in.


Posted by DIDI on Nov-22-2007 10:13:

quote:
Originally posted by Spang
I hope like hell history doesnt repeat itself.

When Billy McMahon was prime minister the country was going well and unemployment was the lowest it had ever been. For some unknown reason the mob decided it was time for a change and voted in Gough Whitlam, probably the worst PM we have ever had and totally destroyed all the good work that had been achieved up to that point.
It is only now that the country is back on track after that little excursion just for the sake of it.

The labor party in the 60's and 70's gave there prefences to the communist party because they had something in common. Not much has changed at all. Lets not forget that the same people who are running the labour party now all backed Mark Latham as there saviour. Same shit different day.

I dont agree with everything howard has done as i think the total control of both houses of parliment went to his head and he probably thought he would be up against Kim beazly in this election, a man he has been all over in the past. The anti terror laws are over the top and some aspects of work choices (ive read the whole 1200 page act) shouldn't be there but all the ads run by the unions and labor about stripping away workers pay and rights is just bullshit.

Our economy is the strongest it has been, our dollar is strong, unemployment is at a 33 year low and the country has no debt. Why vote against that?


Posted by echosystm on Nov-22-2007 11:39:

quote:
Originally posted by Spang
Prove what i said is wrong.


I'm pretty sure he just did, for the most part.


Posted by SeeK on Nov-22-2007 12:19:

quote:
Originally posted by Spang
Prove what i said is wrong.

I dont care what anyone here says as i know that everytime i post something as has happened in the past, i get shut down, but everytime, at the end of the day, the libs get back in.




Posted by Dj_Es-Dva on Nov-22-2007 21:23:

What never ceases to amuse me is that the term "employment" counts everyone who works for more then an hour a week paid or unpaid

I must be to young to understand how political parties are still the same 50 years on


Posted by christos on Nov-22-2007 22:42:

fuck rudd fuck howard...they're two people I could never sit down and share a few cones with and discuss matters that concern the campsite at next years Rainbow Serpent festival...that to me is more important than education, health and a lot of other important matters!

















































Posted by FiK on Nov-23-2007 05:44:

quote:
Originally posted by Spang
I hope like hell history doesnt repeat itself.

When Billy McMahon was prime minister the country was going well and unemployment was the lowest it had ever been. For some unknown reason the mob decided it was time for a change and voted in Gough Whitlam, probably the worst PM we have ever had and totally destroyed all the good work that had been achieved up to that point.
It is only now that the country is back on track after that little excursion just for the sake of it.

The labor party in the 60's and 70's gave there prefences to the communist party because they had something in common. Not much has changed at all. Lets not forget that the same people who are running the labour party now all backed Mark Latham as there saviour. Same shit different day.

I dont agree with everything howard has done as i think the total control of both houses of parliment went to his head and he probably thought he would be up against Kim beazly in this election, a man he has been all over in the past. The anti terror laws are over the top and some aspects of work choices (ive read the whole 1200 page act) shouldn't be there but all the ads run by the unions and labor about stripping away workers pay and rights is just bullshit.

Our economy is the strongest it has been, our dollar is strong, unemployment is at a 33 year low and the country has no debt. Why vote against that?



this coming from someone with tiesto as their avatar lolol


Posted by narcism on Nov-23-2007 05:51:

quote:
Originally posted by christos
fuck rudd fuck howard...they're two people I could never sit down and share a few cones with and discuss matters that concern the campsite at next years Rainbow Serpent festival...that to me is more important than education, health and a lot of other important matters!



raja ram for pm?


Pages (4): « 1 2 [3] 4 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.