What is your fav. MP3 bitrate? - TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Polls - Everything Else...
-- What is your fav. MP3 bitrate?
Pages (4): « 1 2 [3] 4 »

Posted by DJ Mikey Mike on Oct-08-2002 09:02:

quote:
Originally posted by afastest

ok, i understand users on 56k. but why 10 MB is huge for dsl?

naa im 56k. 10 MB aint that big. But yea ur rite on dsl its jack all to download.

Posted by CygnusX on Oct-08-2002 09:17:

192

or mp3pro @ 96

Posted by tc-fan on Nov-01-2002 07:24:

224 rocks..

Posted by Stanza on Nov-01-2002 08:34:

quote:
Originally posted by CygnusX
192

or mp3pro @ 96

I say no to mp3pro

Posted by jp on Nov-01-2002 14:10:

1024 kbit/s heheh

Posted by gatecrasher on Nov-04-2002 17:55:

It has got to be 192 for me, good quality

Posted by DJ Ezzian on Nov-05-2002 14:11:

320 for me.

Quality is more important than size.

But there is not so much of that around so it`s alomost always 192.

But I guess everyone got difernet opinions

Posted by Phu on Nov-06-2002 10:39:

192 is perfect.

Posted by tiesto14 on Nov-11-2002 04:51:

192

Posted by TRx on Nov-11-2002 23:10:

192 kbps best quality/size

Posted by Odyne on Nov-13-2002 13:13:

damn, wanted to vote for 192 bpm, but voted for 160 instead.. oops..

Posted by escee on Nov-13-2002 14:02:

192 baby.

Posted by Dj-Steve on Nov-24-2002 13:39:

192 is l337, but few good frequencies don't sound at all. I have many tracks in 192 bitrate but 256 is good enough for me

Posted by AcidAngel on Jan-21-2003 13:19:

192

Posted by Nalin on Jan-21-2003 13:38:

192 kbps

i can semi tolerate 160 kbps

i hear no difference between 192 kbps and 256 kbps

Posted by Trancer-adu on Jan-21-2003 17:07:

have to go with 192

anything below is kinda but all the stuff above is great...

[EDIT]
wow, two Romanians posted after each other... what a rare occurance...

Posted by Nalin on Jan-21-2003 21:57:

haha, lets make it three in a row

Posted by m0sh on Jan-21-2003 22:14:

192 kbps is fine

Posted by cbxzcm on Jan-22-2003 02:51:

"--alt-preset __________"

Posted by kr00t0n on Jan-25-2003 19:40:

Fek, I cant really notice any difference from 128 up, but I now encode at 160, simply coz ppl complain if its any lower.
160 is still alright, the 1meg per minute ratio is one I like, nice and economical

Posted by TheDemon on Jan-25-2003 23:37:

192kbs is fine with me.

Posted by kluba_702 on Jan-26-2003 14:47:

its gotta b 192

Posted by robin on Feb-11-2003 19:48:

128 is fine, 192 is just a bit beter, higher bitrate is useless, you wont hear the diffrence enyway

voted 192

Posted by elena on Feb-11-2003 23:16:

192 is the magic number

Posted by George Kendall on Feb-16-2003 01:53:

sad poll

Pages (4): « 1 2 [3] 4 »