TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- Nuclear Power
Pages (3): « 1 2 [3]

Re: Re: Nuclear Power

quote:

Originally posted by AustralianGQ sealproof lead containers

yeah you gotta watch out for those seals, sneaky bastards.
They're in cahoots with the dolphins I'm telling ya.

quote:

Originally posted by Redd http://gizmodo.com/393119/scientist...time-in-decades It's all about cold fusion

You dumb fuck, your suggestion IS nuclear power. Fusion and Fission (the current nuclear model) are both thermoNUCLEAR reactions. gtfo now.

quote:

Originally posted by gehzumteufel You dumb fuck, your suggestion IS nuclear power. Fusion and Fission (the current nuclear model) are both thermoNUCLEAR reactions. gtfo now.

Allrightythen mr. sand in vagina, I never said it wasn't. The first sentence in the article makes it quite obvious. Thank you for nothing though.

quote:

Originally posted by Redd Allrightythen mr. sand in vagina, I never said it wasn't. The first sentence in the article makes it quite obvious. Thank you for nothing though.

Well the point of the thread was WHAT ARE YOUR VIEWS ON NUCLEAR POWER?...Since both Fusion and Fission are nuclear power, they both are included in your view of nuclear power. not just "cold fusion is where its at" and link to an article. You aren't articulating any sort of response that is even relevant to the discussion. We all are knowledgeable enough to know about fusion and fission.

Since the dangers of and waste from nuclear power were discussed, and cold fusion is more or less dangerfree it does indeed mean a big positive on using nuclear power doesn't it?

I guess my post could say "I'm all for it, since we're now probably soonish able to do cold fusion on a larger scale." It's reduntant imo, and you're just being a smartass grumbler ****.

edit: but I want to call him a c�nt

quote:

Originally posted by Redd Since the dangers of and waste from nuclear power were discussed, and cold fusion is more or less dangerfree it does indeed mean a big positive on using nuclear power doesn't it? I guess my post could say "I'm all for it, since we're now probably soonish able to do cold fusion on a larger scale." It's reduntant imo, and you're just being a smartass grumbler ****.

lol no, just don't see the point in coming in and saying "its all about fusion" and then leaving it at that, when the thread is about what you think and know about it, your concerns if any, and your view on whether it is best in the current electricity generation climate of today. Feel free to add to the discussion though.

It was more meant like a "hey about that; if you haven't seen it; *link*, pretty exciting news, could change your views". But then again I guess it's old news.

Fusion is a lonnnnnnnnnnnnnnng way away. Actually getting power (as in extracting it) is I'd say 20-30 years away if it's possible! lol

quote:

Originally posted by Dervish Fusion is a lonnnnnnnnnnnnnnng way away. Actually getting power (as in extracting it) is I'd say 20-30 years away if it's possible! lol

Nah it is shorter than that. Reason being, is that they have actually shown that fusion is not just one of those science myths. Because they have now shown it is not a myth, they can get funding to expedite the r&d.

at least that is my opinion.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080619/ap_on_el_pr/mccain


just throwing that out there, that's all.

quote:

Originally posted by gehzumteufel Nah it is shorter than that. Reason being, is that they have actually shown that fusion is not just one of those science myths. Because they have now shown it is not a myth, they can get funding to expedite the r&d. at least that is my opinion.

the temp required to sustain the reaction means nothing can stand the heat so the plasma created needs to be held in place with magnets,assuming the reaction is sustainable (not yet) and actually produces power (not meaningfully yet) even then you still need a method to extract the heat suppose you could gas cool it but without knowing the specifics the mental neutron fluxes would likely activate it all (large volume of cooling gas to extract heat to heat exchangers activated = not so clean lol)

it's not something I know a ton about tho, just seems they are still trying to use 50 year old theory

quote:

Originally posted by Dervish the temp required to sustain the reaction means nothing can stand the heat so the plasma created needs to be held in place with magnets,assuming the reaction is sustainable (not yet) and actually produces power (not meaningfully yet) even then you still need a method to extract the heat suppose you could gas cool it but without knowing the specifics the mental neutron fluxes would likely activate it all (large volume of cooling gas to extract heat to heat exchangers activated = not so clean lol) it's not something I know a ton about tho, just seems they are still trying to use 50 year old theory

I don't doubt there is a lot of work, but the fact that they have a proof of concept helps with funding and companies willing to invest time, research, and manpower to the idea.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.