TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- evolution and the soul
Pages (4): « 1 2 [3] 4 »
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Multusvocis Reality is a biogenetic experiment based in linear time to study emotions. It is a consciousness hologram which had a beginning and an end that is rapidly approaching. References to reptilians and snakes go to DNA and the spiraling movement of consciousness above and below - faster and slower frequencies of thought and understanding. The patterns of reality follow sacred geometric codes that repeat in cycles called time. All is myth, math and metaphor, the goal to remember who you are and how you came to be in the experiment. It is all preprogrammed in your DNA codes, like time capsules ready to open along with the grid consciousness that creates endless programs through which your soul virtually experiences, learns and records information. The name Dilmun comes out of the creational energies of the Middle East, the first insert, an entity called Dilmun in time, by many names, most often represented as a winged bird headed, or reptilian being, playing many roles, in all ancient civilizations and creational myths. Always it is the same entity, same energies, same messages, played out in different programs for the viewers to experience as needed. Dilmun, in various forms as a creator god, is often portrayed carrying a water bucket. This takes us to vessels, containers, blood, sacred bloodline, water, the flow of the collective unconsciousness, and the return to balance in Aquarius. Watering the Tree of Life - Creating a Bloodline |
Re: evolution and the soul
| quote: |
| Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN no, this isn't another one of my religious-bashing threads. i was merely curious: since evolution is irrefutable, and since many theists subscribe to evolution, at what stage did human(monkey)-kind evolve/receive a soul? is it like completing a level of a computer game and being rewarded with a big gun? "hey now monkey, you've grown opposable thumbs! here, have a soul as recognition of your new place in the world" |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by PETRAN Stop drinking Ayahuasca son |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by SuspicionVandit Aliens experimented with with monkey/alien DNA and created the human race. I'd say we earthlings attained our first souls in their embryonic chambers. I find it hard to believe in evolution or else there, along with the "clear" link between monkeys and humans, a clear evolutionary link of the bull to the minotaur, or mosquitoes to fairies. Monkeys can't have been the only species to grow into tax accountants and car salesman. I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express a month ago. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Multusvocis Reality is a biogenetic experiment based in linear time to study emotions. It is a consciousness hologram which had a beginning and an end that is rapidly approaching. References to reptilians and snakes go to DNA and the spiraling movement of consciousness above and below - faster and slower frequencies of thought and understanding. The patterns of reality follow sacred geometric codes that repeat in cycles called time. All is myth, math and metaphor, the goal to remember who you are and how you came to be in the experiment. It is all preprogrammed in your DNA codes, like time capsules ready to open along with the grid consciousness that creates endless programs through which your soul virtually experiences, learns and records information. The name Dilmun comes out of the creational energies of the Middle East, the first insert, an entity called Dilmun in time, by many names, most often represented as a winged bird headed, or reptilian being, playing many roles, in all ancient civilizations and creational myths. Always it is the same entity, same energies, same messages, played out in different programs for the viewers to experience as needed. Dilmun, in various forms as a creator god, is often portrayed carrying a water bucket. This takes us to vessels, containers, blood, sacred bloodline, water, the flow of the collective unconsciousness, and the return to balance in Aquarius. Watering the Tree of Life - Creating a Bloodline |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by nefardec love it. let's not forget Dagon |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by nefardec love it. let's not forget Dagon |
Re: Re: evolution and the soul
| quote: |
| Originally posted by KiNeTiC ENeRgY How do u define soul? |
Re: Re: Re: evolution and the soul
| quote: |
| Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN some part of you that exists after you snuff it. |
Re: Re: Re: Re: evolution and the soul
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On All of you still exists after you die, you are merely disseminated throughout the environment. In fact, whatever we are made of was present at the very beginning and will be there until the very end. |
Re: Re: Re: Re: evolution and the soul
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On All of you still exists after you die, you are merely disseminated throughout the environment. In fact, whatever we are made of was present at the very beginning and will be there until the very end. |
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: evolution and the soul
| quote: |
| Originally posted by RJT It's funny you post this, because it basically summarizes nicely how I would describe my "spiritual" side. I would definitely describe myself in some sense as a "materialist", or an "atomist", who genuinely believes all that exists is matter and that the only gratification one can expect from an "afterlife" is to return themselves back to the fundamental elements of existence. |
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: evolution and the soul
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Lira (Unless I misunderstood you and we actually think alike) |

i agree with you two hippies, nicely put. and nice to see you back on the boards occasionally RJT.
Re: evolution and the soul
| quote: |
| Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN no, this isn't another one of my religious-bashing threads. i was merely curious: since evolution is irrefutable, and since many theists subscribe to evolution, at what stage did human(monkey)-kind evolve/receive a soul? is it like completing a level of a computer game and being rewarded with a big gun? "hey now monkey, you've grown opposable thumbs! here, have a soul as recognition of your new place in the world" |
Re: Re: Re: Re: evolution and the soul
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On All of you still exists after you die, you are merely disseminated throughout the environment. In fact, whatever we are made of was present at the very beginning and will be there until the very end. |
Once the nearest star massive enough goes supernova we will all be spread across space to eventually form new planets and stars which will probably lead to new forms of life. We are all star stuff as I like to say.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Zild Once the nearest star massive enough goes supernova we will all be spread across space to eventually form new planets and stars which will probably lead to new forms of life. We are all star stuff as I like to say. |
I also don't do drugs and kids don't forget to stay away from illegal substances
| quote: |
| Originally posted by PETRAN Yeah, i understand what you and the other guys said about the "materials surviving" but the question is not about the destiny of my bodily molecules after death, the question is about the survival of consciousness and/or awareness. To which i clearly think that if there is no brain, there is no consciousness/awareness. BUT (lol) I get these crazy sci-fi ideas at times though and i'd like to share them with fellow TA thinkers. Most people associate the "soul" with some form of spiritual being that exists seperate from the body, a kind of "ghost in the shell". They also associate it with ghosts and other paranormal phenomena. IMO, there is no need for a "ghost-soul in a bodily shell" or other crazy spiritual/ethereal stuff in order for cosnciousness to survive after death. Just think that brain dynamics is based on complex neuronal computations. Synaptic transmissions/neuronal firings (action potentials) work much like computers-they either fire or not fire, 1 or 0 (of course the firings in intermmediate neurons can be continuous and graded rather than absolute but this is not really a problem). This is how your consciounsess and experience is (somehow!) produced. As a result, the brain can be said to be a "Turing Machine" of some sorts, a computer. According to Turing (the pioneer of computational theory) if given enough resources, any Turing machine can "run" (simulate) any other Turing Machine. So, if God is somehow a computer (yeah i don't take drugs), or the universe has some sort of a computational nature embedded within it and this nature has large (infinite would be better i guess!) computational resources, it would literally re-simulate all the brain-states that you had as a human. I mean something, somewhere, somehow for some bloody reason could "re-simulate" you. This is strangely enough what Christianity describes (and maybe other religions as well? I don't know). Many (christian) people hold the false belief that when you die your soul survives and it either goes to heaven or hell. As far as i'm concerned this is false. Your soul survives in a neutral/abstract state until the day of the apocalypse (i think) in which "your body is resurrected and you will be judged" by god. The afterlife occurs after the supossed "judgement", and it is granted to only those who are moral at heart. So this resurrection could actually be a computational resurrection (simulation). I don't really know what morality and/or emotion in general have to do with all these, but maybe it would make sense if you were simulated (for whatever bloody reason)to be actually good. So this god-computer, having all the brain states and their outcomes (minds) of all people (and/or living beings in general) stored in its memory, could compute the positive and negative impacts of one's behaviour on the experiences of others. In simple words, it could compute the number and degree of "good" or "bad" experiences that you have caused (with your behaviour to other human beings or living beings in general-and maybe to yourself) and produces a decision about your "goodness/badness". If your goodness (measured by the experiences of the beings that you have encountered in your life) exceeds a certian criterion then you would be be simulated again (there would be some sort of complex criterions for all these). If the experiences you are associated with are more painful than joyful, then you will not be simulated and hence stay inexistent (hell?). Why all these? Who really knows lol. And its just some crazy idea of mine anyway. I think a physicist (and a priest i think lol) named J. Tipler (or something) described some similar ideas but i haven't red any of his work yet. I think that he is much more specific about similar ideas i described and it is related to the "anthropic cosmological principle", but this is another (complex) story. These are just some crazy sci-fi ideas i get when i listen to Aphex Twin's Selected Ambient Works and Come to Daddy whilst watching Narwhals mating in the cold oceans, i don't embrace them myself. I also don't do drugs and kids don't forget to stay away from illegal substances |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by KiNeTiC ENeRgY Imagine how creative you would become if you did do drugs. You're missing out on life |
I would literally be identical to ******** (if im not already with this post
)
Re: Re: evolution and the soul
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Saka And evolution isn't irrefutable. That's why it is the 'theory' of evolution. |
A theory has to be potentially "refutable" in order to be scientific. Once you make predictions about contingent events, which is what science does, you open up the possibility that your theory could be refuted if things turn out differently than you expect.
But there's a big gap between "potentially refutable" and "refuted by the evidence we currently possess." Evolution is potentially refutable, but it is not refuted.

| quote: |
| Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles A theory has to be potentially "refutable" in order to be scientific. Once you make predictions about contingent events, which is what science does, you open up the possibility that your theory could be refuted if things turn out differently than you expect. But there's a big gap between "potentially refutable" and "refuted by the evidence we currently possess." Evolution is potentially refutable, but it is not refuted. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Zild It's OK. Those plants didn't have a free will. |

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: evolution and the soul
| quote: |
| Originally posted by RJT It's funny you post this, because it basically summarizes nicely how I would describe my "spiritual" side. I would definitely describe myself in some sense as a "materialist", or an "atomist", who genuinely believes all that exists is matter and that the only gratification one can expect from an "afterlife" is to return themselves back to the fundamental elements of existence. It's also why I want to be cremated and have a tree planted in my ashes. Well, that, and the fact that I'm a filthy, stinking hippie at heart. |
| quote: |
| What is spirit and what is matter? The difference between spirit and matter is like the difference between water and ice: frozen water is ice and melted ice is water. It is spirit in its denseness which we call matter; it is matter in its fineness which may be called spirit. Once a materialist said to me, 'I do not believe in any spirit or soul or hereafter. I believe in eternal matter.' I said to him, 'Your belief is not very different from mine, only that which you call eternal matter I call spirit; it is a difference in terms. There is nothing to dispute about because we both believe in eternity; and so long as we meet in eternity, what difference does it make, if the one calls it matter, and the other calls it spirit? It is one life from beginning to end.' |
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.