TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- Osama Bin Laden
Pages (5): « 1 2 [3] 4 5 »


Posted by Orbital32 on Feb-10-2009 13:42:



puppies are sooooo cute.


Posted by denys envy on Feb-10-2009 16:16:

quote:
Originally posted by Orbital32


puppies are sooooo cute.


omg, on the right, it's a hoverdog!


Posted by apple country on Feb-10-2009 17:57:

quote:
Originally posted by dj_alfi
chaaaaangeeeeee


Posted by SteelWolf on Feb-10-2009 18:03:

Hitler was a fake.

The holocaust NEVER happened, all 6 MILLION jews are just hiding somewhere. There is no way that the showers could be sealed to keep the gas in.

Germany NEVER bombed England. The Brits are FAKERS. They were just jealous of Poland.

Germany NEVER tried to take over the world. Poland, the Czec Republic, France, Belgium, Italy, Belgium, Denmark and the rest were just really good friends of Adolf.

Oh yeah, and pearl harbor? The fucking islanders just wanted some attention.

Communism was never a threat. Never mind the MILLIONS of people that the communist regime oppressed and KILLED.

Pol Pot NEVER killed 2 MILLION people in Cambodia.

Nuclear weapons are FAKE and were definitely not dropped on Japan and so totally do not exist. And while I'm at it, the Japanese totally NEVER killed millions of Chinese people with Biological weapons.

Fidel Castro was actually NOT a murderer and is actually a really cool dude.

The Turks totally didn't slaughter the Armenians.

The Kurds totally did NOT get killed by Saddam Hussein. Saddam was such a greatguy, the Iraqi's didn't thank us when we ousted him. And the Iraqi's didn't hang him, he's actually secretly Barack Hussein Obama's advisor on Terror.

Osama doesn't exist.

9/11 was a CONSPIRACY. The twin towers were like so totally blown up by explosives. There's no possible way that a fully loaded, fully fueled 747 that weighs 900,000 lbs and travelling at 500 MPH could have POSSIBLY knocked it down. HELLO!!!! So totally fake.

Radical Islam is no threat at all, terrorism is soooooo fake. The Palestinians are totally NOT bombing the Israelis. Those poooooooooor Palestinians, why won't Israel leave them alone? All Palestine wants if for every jew to DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE is that so much to ask? But no, they have to keep living. See, the Palestinians are misunderstood.

All of the following terrorist attacks are BULLSHIT. Terrorists are nice people who are misunderstood.

March 2002, Israel
Three bombs, independently planned but all timed to coincide with the Passover festival. One hits a Passover dinner at a hotel in Netanya, killing 20 people. Another in Tel Aviv kills 29 and a suicide bomber attacks an Arab-owned restaurant in Haifa and kills 14.
October 12 2002, Bali, Indonesia
Car bombs outside nightclubs popular with foreign tourists kill 202 people, 91 of them Australians. An Indonesian Islamist group with Al-Qaida links is blamed.

October 23 2002, Moscow
Chechen gunmen and women take over a theatre and hold everyone inside hostage. They later shoot dead several of the hostages. Russian troops use gas to subdue the hostage takers, and kill 50 of them. However, the gas also kills 179 of the hostages.

May 16 2003, Casablanca, Morocco
Five bombs targeted at Jewish and western people in the city kill 41, mostly Moroccans. Six Europeans also die.

May 12 2003, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Suicide bomber attacks on residential compounds inhabited by westerners kills 34 people. Al-Qaida blamed.

November 20 2003, Istanbul, Turkey
Truck bomb attacks on the British Consulate and the HSBC bank kill over 60 people, including the British consul general in the city.

March 11 2004, Madrid
Explosions aboard four commuter trains arriving at Atocha station during the morning rush hour. Bombs were in backpacks, and detonated using a mobile phone, killing191 people and injuring 1,800. Spanish government of Jose Maria Aznar at first suggests the Basque separatist group Eta is to blame, but later concedes the attacks were the work of Islamists. Popular anger at being "misled" leads to victory of the opposition at a general election a few days later.

September 1 - 3 2004, Beslan, Russia
Islamist gunmen take over 1,000 hostages, mostly children, at a school in North Ossetia. After a three-day siege many of the hostages are killed in an explosion in the school gym, after which Russian troops storm the building. The final death toll is over 330, many of them children. 800 more are injured.

And of course the attacks in Mumbai. Total bullshit.

Tho I imagine a lot of Jews, Russians, Spaniards, Brits, Moroccans, Indonesians and others would say they were attacked, but THEY ARE ALL ATTENTION WHORES. Totally NOT real. Those news reports are fake. The news is trying to CONTROL YOU!!!! AHHHHHH!!!! GEORGE ORWELL WAS RIGHT!!!!!!!

Get real people.
Bad people exist and need to be taken care of.

If WMD's don't exist then WHY THE FUCK WAS I EXPOSED TO SARIN NERVE GAS IN IRAQ?

It's ok, be ignorant. Terrorism is a game of one upping the other guy. So its ok, keep being ignorant, keep ignoring it. 9/11 was pretty fucked up, I wonder whats next?

EDIT
There is a BIG DIFFERENCE between a Muslim person and a Radical Islamic Terrorist.

Thos I didn;t vote for Obama, I'm interested to see the "CHANGE" tho NOTHING has changed yet. I hope he takes this all seriously.


Posted by UmmiE on Feb-10-2009 18:24:

quote:
Originally posted by SteelWolf


Thos I didn;t vote for Obama, I'm interested to see the "CHANGE" tho NOTHING has changed yet. I hope he takes this all seriously.


This is the biggest thing people expect change right away as if "Mr.President" has a button that has change written over it and when he presses it everything magically changes......You guys have to be patient and wait for it to slowly take place something that took 8 yrs to get this ugly could not be fixed over night we are in the most difficult times one can be President in ......where half of the world outside America hates you for the stupid things previous admin did to them and their regions........Anyways just give it time its not even 6 months yet.


Posted by adi_hanson on Feb-10-2009 18:42:

steelwolf , i like your style


Posted by nchs09 on Feb-10-2009 19:16:

quote:
Originally posted by adi_hanson
steelwolf , i like your style
Didnt he steal some dead iraqi's watch after he shot him?

Def. do not like his style.


Posted by SuspicionVandit on Feb-10-2009 19:34:

SteelWolf did not let a precious metal go to waste.

I like his style.


Posted by Allied Nations on Feb-10-2009 19:55:

whens the video game coming out

"Find osama"


Posted by wotyzoid on Feb-10-2009 20:35:

SteelWolf doesn't exist.


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Feb-10-2009 22:03:

quote:
Originally posted by UmmiE
House of Bush, House of Saud
The Secret Relationship Between the World's Two Most Powerful Dynasties :-


Osama says HE HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THE ATTACKS OF 9/11! - Here is the transcript of what you were not allowed to hear from Osama binLaden's own mouth: - Not many people know that, after September 11, 2001, Osama bin Laden issued a statement on tape that he had nothing to do with the attacks on America and that such actions were against the teachings of Islam. Americans were prevented from accessing this information because we were told that Osama could possibly have an embedded "secret code" in the tape that would alert other terrorists cells to "activate" and target other American cities. - Osama bin Laden: "I was not involved in the September 11 attacks in the United States nor did I have knowledge of the attacks. There exists a government within a government within the United States. The United States should try to trace the perpetrators of these attacks within itself; to the people who want to make the present century a century of conflict between Islam and Christianity. That secret government must be asked as to who carried out the attacks. ... The American system is totally in control of the Jews, whose first priority is Israel, not the United States."
FBI Bin Laden Not Wanted 'Dead or Alive' for 9-11 - FBI Director Robert Mueller, in a speech at the Commonwealth Club on April 19, 2002, said: "In our investigation, we have not uncovered a single piece of paper - either here in the United States, or in the treasure trove of information that has turned up in Afghanistan and elsewhere - that mentioned any aspect of the September 11 plot." - The evidence against Bin Laden, promised by Secretary of State Colin Powell on September 23, 2001, has yet to be made available to the public.

CIA: Osama Helped Bush in '04 - On Oct. 29, 2004, just four days before the U.S. presidential election, al-Qaeda leader Osama bin-Laden released a videotape denouncing George W. Bush. Some Bush supporters quickly spun the diatribe as �Osama�s endorsement of John Kerry.� But behind the walls of the CIA, analysts had concluded the opposite: that bin-Laden was trying to help Bush gain a second term. - This stunning CIA disclosure is tucked away in a brief passage near the end of Ron Suskind�s The One Percent Doctrine, which draws heavily from CIA insiders.

CIA closes down unit that was hunting Bin Laden - The terrorist tracking unit, known inside the spy agency as "Alec station," was disbanded late last year and its analysts reassigned to other offices within the CIA's Counterterrorist Center, the officials said. - TVNL COMMENT: Any Questions? Bush had no intentions of getting his buddy.

Bush & Bin Laden - Kindred Spirits - A TVNL Flyer
FBI PROTECTS OSAMA BIN LADEN�S �RIGHT TO PRIVACY� IN DOCUMENT RELEASE - Judicial Watch, the public interest group that fights government corruption, announced today that it has obtained documents through the Freedom of Information Act (�FOIA�) in which the Federal Bureau of Investigation (�FBI�) has invoked privacy right protections on behalf of al Qaeda terror leader Osama bin Laden. In a September 24, 2003 declassified �Secret� FBI report obtained by Judicial Watch, the FBI invoked Exemption 6 under FOIA law on behalf of bin Laden, which permits the government to withhold all information about U.S. persons in �personnel and medical files and similar files� when the disclosure of such information �would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.� (5 U.S.C. � 552(b)(6) (2000)) - Before invoking privacy protections for Osama bin Laden under Exemption 6, the FBI should have conducted a balancing �test� of the public's right to disclosure against the individual's right to privacy


Source


god certainly made you darkies simple.


Posted by Frenchie on Feb-10-2009 22:05:

lol darkies.


Posted by Spin Laden on Feb-11-2009 01:04:

whassup bitches?


Posted by SteelWolf on Feb-11-2009 01:51:

quote:
Originally posted by Frenchie
lol darkies.


+1 lolololol


Posted by UmmiE on Feb-11-2009 13:14:

quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
god certainly made you darkies simple.



Let see what you know of the ties between Bush and the Bin Laden Family?


Posted by Lebezniatnikov on Feb-11-2009 13:19:

quote:
Originally posted by Arbiter
he's dead


I'm inclined to agree. Diabetes, a silent killer.


Posted by tubularbills on Feb-11-2009 13:20:

quote:
Originally posted by Spin Laden
whassup bitches?
awesome.


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Feb-11-2009 21:52:

quote:
Originally posted by UmmiE
Let see what you know of the ties between Bush and the Bin Laden Family?


Fucking clueless hack. Let's see what you know about OSAMA bin laden and the US government. Honestly, somebody makes a poorly-researched film and suddenly there's conspiracy behind every corner. Fucking grow up, darkie.


Posted by adi_hanson on Feb-11-2009 22:18:

quote:
Originally posted by Spin Laden
whassup bitches?


are you into death house?


Posted by UmmiE on Feb-12-2009 04:52:

quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
Fucking clueless hack. Let's see what you know about OSAMA bin laden and the US government. Honestly, somebody makes a poorly-researched film and suddenly there's conspiracy behind every corner. Fucking grow up, darkie.



LOL I should grow up you're the one acting like little boy calling names and acting big and bad....I think you need to grow up atleast mentally.



Try to look for sources other than CNN and wikibiasedia.....and then we shall talk.


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Feb-12-2009 05:07:

fuck you, moron.


Posted by Silky Johnson on Feb-12-2009 05:09:


Posted by Dilmeet on Feb-12-2009 05:34:

quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
Fucking clueless hack. Let's see what you know about OSAMA bin laden and the US government. Honestly, somebody makes a poorly-researched film and suddenly there's conspiracy behind every corner. Fucking grow up, darkie.



You're just scared. If you think there's only one film/book out there, it's obvious you are just ignorant and naive, and uneducated. It's because of people like you why secrets have to be kept. Go back to your comfort zone; reality TV and My Chemical Romance. Just live the happy, blue-collared life, where your closed-mid can criticize all the people you want for their beliefs and opinions.


Posted by happyness on Feb-12-2009 06:42:

quote:
Originally posted by Dilmeet Go back to your comfort zone; reality TV and My Chemical Romance. Just live the happy, blue-collared life, where your closed-mid can criticize all the people you want for their beliefs and opinions.



harsh


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Feb-12-2009 07:59:

quote:
Originally posted by Dilmeet
You're just scared. If you think there's only one film/book out there, it's obvious you are just ignorant and naive, and uneducated. It's because of people like you why secrets have to be kept. Go back to your comfort zone; reality TV and My Chemical Romance. Just live the happy, blue-collared life, where your closed-mid can criticize all the people you want for their beliefs and opinions.


the only thing im scared about is the sincere lack of intellectual honesty portrayed by people like yourself or ummie. im scared that today's generations are educated by youtube videos and second-rate books published by obvious charlatans. i am truly amazed by how many of you 'internet detectives' exist. yes, indeed i am scared by that.

sitting around obsessing over zeitgeist, or loose change or something written by david icke isn't doing real research. embarrassing displays of confirmation bias isn't a substitute for analysis.

i'll bet my left nut that everything you have ever thought or said regarding these topics falls into one of the categories below:

10 characteristics of conspiracy theorists
A useful guide by Donna Ferentes


1. Arrogance. They are always fact-seekers, questioners, people who are trying to discover the truth: sceptics are always "sheep", patsies for Messrs Bush and Blair etc.

2. Relentlessness. They will always go on and on about a conspiracy no matter how little evidence they have to go on or how much of what they have is simply discredited. (Moreover, as per 1. above, even if you listen to them ninety-eight times, the ninety-ninth time, when you say "no thanks", you'll be called a "sheep" again.) Additionally, they have no capacity for precis whatsoever. They go on and on at enormous length.

3. Inability to answer questions. For people who loudly advertise their determination to the principle of questioning everything, they're pretty poor at answering direct questions from sceptics about the claims that they make.

4. Fondness for certain stock phrases. These include Cicero's "cui bono?" (of which it can be said that Cicero understood the importance of having evidence to back it up) and Conan Doyle's "once we have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however unlikely, must be the truth". What these phrases have in common is that they are attempts to absolve themselves from any responsibility to produce positive, hard evidence themselves: you simply "eliminate the impossible" (i.e. say the official account can't stand scrutiny) which means that the wild allegation of your choice, based on "cui bono?" (which is always the government) is therefore the truth.

5. Inability to employ or understand Occam's Razor. Aided by the principle in 4. above, conspiracy theorists never notice that the small inconsistencies in the accounts which they reject are dwarfed by the enormous, gaping holes in logic, likelihood and evidence in any alternative account.

6. Inability to tell good evidence from bad. Conspiracy theorists have no place for peer-review, for scientific knowledge, for the respectability of sources. The fact that a claim has been made by anybody, anywhere, is enough for them to reproduce it and demand that the questions it raises be answered, as if intellectual enquiry were a matter of responding to every rumour. While they do this, of course, they will claim to have "open minds" and abuse the sceptics for apparently lacking same.

7. Inability to withdraw. It's a rare day indeed when a conspiracy theorist admits that a claim they have made has turned out to be without foundation, whether it be the overall claim itself or any of the evidence produced to support it. Moreover they have a liking (see 3. above) for the technique of avoiding discussion of their claims by "swamping" - piling on a whole lot more material rather than respond to the objections sceptics make to the previous lot.

8. Leaping to conclusions. Conspiracy theorists are very keen indeed to declare the "official" account totally discredited without having remotely enough cause so to do. Of course this enables them to wheel on the Conan Doyle quote as in 4. above. Small inconsistencies in the account of an event, small unanswered questions, small problems in timing of differences in procedure from previous events of the same kind are all more than adequate to declare the "official" account clearly and definitively discredited. It goes without saying that it is not necessary to prove that these inconsistencies are either relevant, or that they even definitely exist.

9. Using previous conspiracies as evidence to support their claims. This argument invokes scandals like the Birmingham Six, the Bologna station bombings, the Zinoviev letter and so on in order to try and demonstrate that their conspiracy theory should be accorded some weight (because it's �happened before�.) They do not pause to reflect that the conspiracies they are touting are almost always far more unlikely and complicated than the real-life conspiracies with which they make comparison, or that the fact that something might potentially happen does not, in and of itself, make it anything other than extremely unlikely.

10. It's always a conspiracy. And it is, isn't it? No sooner has the body been discovered, the bomb gone off, than the same people are producing the same old stuff, demanding that there are questions which need to be answered, at the same unbearable length. Because the most important thing about these people is that they are people entirely lacking in discrimination. They cannot tell a good theory from a bad one, they cannot tell good evidence from bad evidence and they cannot tell a good source from a bad one. And for that reason, they always come up with the same answer when they ask the same question.

A person who always says the same thing, and says it over and over again is, of course, commonly considered to be, if not a monomaniac, then at very least, a bore.

---

oh, and fuck you too.


Pages (5): « 1 2 [3] 4 5 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.