TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- Which era would you like to live in?
Pages (5): « 1 2 [3] 4 5 »


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Jul-06-2009 10:11:

quote:
Originally posted by Sushipunk
Native animals are highly protected, under law. Are you owning up for a massive fine PKC?


there's no evidence. luckily for me at the time of the shooting there wasn't some weirdo hiding in the bushes taking photographs


Posted by squirrelly on Jul-06-2009 15:07:

50's and 60's.



//edit

But I probably would NOT have been a gung-ho feminist.


Posted by winston on Jul-06-2009 15:16:

none. i'd prefer to choose alternate/parallel realities, works of science fiction brought to real (physical) life and preferably a time where we are not limited by genetics, a time where our consciousness can roam free...


Posted by Acton on Jul-06-2009 15:24:

I wouldn't mind living in the early Cretaceous period, that and around 45BC in the Roman Empire (I'd probably visit the Egyptians around then as well)

I think they both would be pretty damn interesting.

I wouldn't mind going to ancient Greece either, just so I can pwn them all with superior mathematics.


Posted by Omega_M on Jul-06-2009 17:06:

3100. that's when I wana live.


Posted by MrJiveBoJingles on Jul-06-2009 17:26:

quote:
Originally posted by Omega_M
3100. that's when I wana live.

So that the superintelligent robots who replace us will have a chance to study a specimen of primitive humanity?


Posted by tubularbills on Jul-06-2009 17:27:

quote:
Originally posted by jonSun
im pretty happy with the era i grew up in


and i feel im still growing up


although i think it would have been cool to see the berlin wall fall; and realize what was really going on.


Posted by yukii on Jul-06-2009 17:28:

1960's or 1980's.


Posted by Moral Hazard on Jul-06-2009 17:28:

What's with people always looking backward and idealizing the past? There is no past golden age folks... everything that sucks ass about this time is parrallelled by shit that sucked ass in past eras only then it sucked ass even worse. I'll take now, thank you very much. Oh, and don't give me this "hard mode" shit... yeah, struggle is great in order to prove your worth; however, it's only great because eventually it ends and you get to go back to enjoying your life... in the European dark ages you got to struggle; sure, but you never got to stop struggling (until your untimely death at the ripe old age of 35-40)... what good is it to know your worth if you never get to enjoy it?


Posted by kbot on Jul-06-2009 18:03:

right now!
if i went back, there wouldnt be all the music we have today.. i love psychedelic but there sure wasnt a lot of electronic in those days lol..also mdma was not really out on the street until the 70's

but if you went back, would you have the knowledge of where you were before and that you chose to go back? [you could get hella rich "inventing" things you knew from the future that hadnt yet been made]
or would you forget? maybe we've already forgotten...if we are from the future, had this opportunity and chose to go back to the time we were born in now for whatever reason but cannot recall any of it.


Posted by Reza on Jul-06-2009 21:54:

the era where they figure out how we can live forever


Posted by Domesticated on Jul-06-2009 23:14:

quote:
Originally posted by Sushipunk
So what about you, Domesticated? Which era, and why?


I feel that we're on the brink of another age which will rival the industrial revolution or the advent of computers. This will perhaps be related to nano technology.

However, I also believe that we're fast reaching a tipping point where we will either completely fuck the planet or somehow manage to save it and return it to some kind of artificially induced homeostasis. Which way this battle swings will be very close.

Therefore, I'd like to live perhaps 400-500 years into the future. Think back to what kind of technology we had in 1609, and then imagine that same level of advancement on top of what we have now.

I envisage a world where nano technology reigns supreme. Self-cleaning clothes, self-powered, battery-free devices and tiny artificial organisms living in our blood and taking up the fight where our own body fails. Our physical bodies will last for huge amounts of time as a result. Quantum computers, matrix-style virtual reality (they already have video game controllers that work by sitting on your temples and 'reading' your thoughts).

In the future, we will have a global network which will be to current day internet what the internet has been to telephones. It will be far more accessible, more useful and more widespread. I firmly believe that most technology will become thought-based and that we will mostly do away with physical buttons and controls. Just by thinking 'what is the capital of Congo?', this 'new internet' will call it up for us, and the sum total of humanity's general knowledge will be at the fingertips of Joe Average all day every day.

I think this will be pretty cool and would like to experience it.


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Jul-06-2009 23:55:

quote:
Originally posted by Domesticated
I feel that we're on the brink of another age which will rival the industrial revolution or the advent of computers. This will perhaps be related to nano technology.

However, I also believe that we're fast reaching a tipping point where we will either completely fuck the planet or somehow manage to save it and return it to some kind of artificially induced homeostasis. Which way this battle swings will be very close.

Therefore, I'd like to live perhaps 400-500 years into the future. Think back to what kind of technology we had in 1609, and then imagine that same level of advancement on top of what we have now.

I envisage a world where nano technology reigns supreme. Self-cleaning clothes, self-powered, battery-free devices and tiny artificial organisms living in our blood and taking up the fight where our own body fails. Our physical bodies will last for huge amounts of time as a result. Quantum computers, matrix-style virtual reality (they already have video game controllers that work by sitting on your temples and 'reading' your thoughts).

In the future, we will have a global network which will be to current day internet what the internet has been to telephones. It will be far more accessible, more useful and more widespread. I firmly believe that most technology will become thought-based and that we will mostly do away with physical buttons and controls. Just by thinking 'what is the capital of Congo?', this 'new internet' will call it up for us, and the sum total of humanity's general knowledge will be at the fingertips of Joe Average all day every day.

I think this will be pretty cool and would like to experience it.


i never pictured you as a hopeless optimist.


Posted by Zharen on Jul-07-2009 00:03:

quote:
Originally posted by narcism
60's
the beatles
the anti-war movement
feminism
the start of space exploration


Same. I would Back to the Future II that shit and buy some sports almanacs, make millions of dollars in bets and own my own casino. All while frying with hippies and snorting blow with disco heads.


Posted by Rose on Jul-07-2009 00:46:

60's, 70's or 80's.


Posted by idoru on Jul-07-2009 02:00:

I'd love to go back and experience the 20's. Most notably for Jazz and the Speakeasies. Fuck yes.


Posted by Arbiter on Jul-07-2009 02:15:

quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
i bet you wouldnt last 5 seconds 1200 years ago. the only thing that big brain of yours would get you back then is killed


You could very well be right, but the very prospect of meaningful failure is what I yearn for. These days, the only reasonably likely prospects are varying degrees of success--unless I intentionally sabotage myself, which is just too contrived.


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Jul-07-2009 02:23:

quote:
Originally posted by Arbiter
You could very well be right, but the very prospect of meaningful failure is what I yearn for. These days, the only reasonably likely prospects are varying degrees of success--unless I intentionally sabotage myself, which is just too contrived.


from a subsistence standpoint you're definitely correct, but since we are so far past that surely there are other opportunities for challenges that give you the option for meaningful failure? i mean, if we're using failure to mean death (as you failed to meet your basic needs for subsistence) perhaps a career that will take you outside the law library in the world's richest nation might be in order?


Posted by Domesticated on Jul-07-2009 02:23:

quote:
Originally posted by Arbiter
You could very well be right, but the very prospect of meaningful failure is what I yearn for. These days, the only reasonably likely prospects are varying degrees of success--unless I intentionally sabotage myself, which is just too contrived.


You're overestimating yourself.

If your measure of success is to marry, have children and live without death or major financial hardship, then yes, you are going to be very easily satisfied. If however, your aim is to build a machine that can turn nitrogen into oxygen with no by-products, you are going to face significant challenges and enjoy life on 'hard mode'. Yes, you will not be struggling for survival, but you will still be struggling for something.

Perhaps your yearning for meaningful failure is the result of your inability to set challenges for yourself.


Posted by Domesticated on Jul-07-2009 02:24:

quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
i mean, if we're using failure to mean death (as you failed to meet your basic needs for subsistence) perhaps a career that will take you outside the law library in the world's richest nation might be in order?


Exactly.


Posted by Arbiter on Jul-07-2009 02:25:

quote:
Originally posted by DJ Damerchi
Why go back 1200 years when you can worry solely about where to get your next meal in Somalia today? not so romantic anymore is it...


You know, when I lived in Africa I found it fascinating watching the people walk to work. For many of them, it was a few hours by foot but even then they were relatively lucky; after all, they had jobs.

Those were people carrying real burdens. And yet, if you spend just a couple of hours watching them walk you will see more smiles than you would in a thousand rush hours in Washington, DC...


Posted by Arbiter on Jul-07-2009 02:29:

quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
from a subsistence standpoint you're definitely correct, but since we are so far past that surely there are other opportunities for challenges that give you the option for meaningful failure? i mean, if we're using failure to mean death (as you failed to meet your basic needs for subsistence) perhaps a career that will take you outside the law library in the world's richest nation might be in order?


There are plenty of things I could try to do and probably fail, but I'd still be pefectly fine. At worst, I'd suffer a bruised ego. That may be a failure, but I would hardly call it meaningful...


Posted by MrJiveBoJingles on Jul-07-2009 02:32:

Maybe you could take up extreme sports? Climb Mount Everest? Failure in those endeavors can involve quite a bit more than a bruised ego.


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Jul-07-2009 02:37:

quote:
Originally posted by Arbiter
There are plenty of things I could try to do and probably fail, but I'd still be pefectly fine. At worst, I'd suffer a bruised ego. That may be a failure, but I would hardly call it meaningful...


well, perhaps we have found your achilles heel: lack of imagination


Posted by Arbiter on Jul-07-2009 02:51:

quote:
Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles
Maybe you could take up extreme sports? Climb Mount Everest? Failure in those endeavors can involve quite a bit more than a bruised ego.



Meh, any jeopardy I could put myself in would be too contrived.

If I just wanted to put myself in danger there would be lots of options. Something as simple as posting everything I've worked on in the last five years on this board could put me in plenty of danger.

It might be exciting, but in the end I'd mostly just feel like an idiot for putting myself in danger for no real reason. Besides, I have important work to do. My own existential boredom is a small price to pay.


Pages (5): « 1 2 [3] 4 5 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.