TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- there is no such thing as progressive trance
Pages (8): « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 »

quote:

Originally posted by EddieZilker This doesn't even make sense. I honestly wonder what you gain by displaying stupidity that isn't even unintentionally funny.

Clearly he thinks saying stupid / controversial / unpopular things will somehow make up for the plethora of rubbish threads he's made on this board. He's gone from being just a thread-trigger-happy imbecile to an imbecile who bumps every old-as-hell thread he ever made plus a shitload of others with new rubbish, this time with preemptive excuses all over them. He's seen Jesus and it's fucking awful.

The only redeeming fact is that it adds to activity in the MD. I'd rather he pissed off.

I know my posts and threads are known for having shock value, but I'm telling yall, I did not start the idea that progressive trance doesn't exist. that would be preposterous for one man to derail an entire genre. this has been said by people over the years because progressive is a really strong word that is plastered on various kinds of music. please understand that before more people take my kindness for a weakness.

Your threads aren't known to have shock value, they're known to be absolute horseshit.

Smile..

don't get it twisted, I'm not saying progressive trance doesn't exist as much as the toothfairy. why would I deny something that could be dead obviously real?
I privately messaged Ishkur about this, who isn't a pushover when it comes to these genre labels. he even questions the authenticity of progressive trance in his flash guide. if he does respond to my PM or even posts in this thread I linked for him and says progressive trance does exist, I'll shut up.

This is progressive trance:



Now shut up.

quote:

Originally posted by Mattinsanity I know my posts and threads are known for being passive-aggressive, but I'm telling y'all, I did not start the idea that passive-aggressive trolling satisfies me intensely. that would be preposterous for one man to derail an entire forum. this has been said by people over the years because passive-aggression is really a mask for my inadequacy that is plastered all over Music Discussion. please understand that before more people mistake my aggression for passivity.

Fixed!

I would like to hear at least one good argument why prog trance wouldn't exist if there even is a one...

quote:

Originally posted by Psynon I would like to hear at least one good argument why prog trance wouldn't exist if there even is a one...

It's trancy progressive house.

Matt, if you took half the time you spend making shitty posts and being an idiot, and instead spent that time practicing your mixing, it would probably make quite a difference.

quote:

Originally posted by Psynon I would like to hear at least one good argument why prog trance wouldn't exist if there even is a one...

Psynon = Mattinsanity

quote:

Originally posted by Trance-MB Psynon = Mattinsanity

That's good to know...

Should I take this as an insult?

quote:

Originally posted by Psynon That's good to know... Should I take this as an insult?

Mattinsanity would't care.

But Mattinsanity shutting up and you with just 7 posts at the moment seemed not like a coincidence to me.
Also regarding your reply in the COR. I think you were here before.

quote:

Originally posted by Trance-MB Mattinsanity would't care.

I know.

quote:

Originally posted by Trance-MB Also regarding your reply in the COR. I think you were here before.

That's also true.

quote:

Originally posted by Psynon I know. That's also true. Had to abandon it: http://www.tranceaddict.com/forums/...o&userid=102297

Okay, that explains it, just curious, was it your first reply after rejoining in this thread? If you did and you said you were waiting for this I actually would believe that, such a coincidence.

quote:

Originally posted by Trance-MB Okay, that explains it, just curious, was it your first reply after rejoining in this thread?

Yep.

quote:

Originally posted by Trance-MB such a coincidence.

Crazy world isn't it?

Someone once described to me that progressive trance to be trance that sounds like house and progressive house to be house that sounds like trance

I know I vowed I'd shut up after the famous Ish spoke but fuck that.

quote:

Originally posted by EddieZilker Fixed!

well passive aggressive fucks are the most annoying imbreds walking on god's green earth.

quote:

Matt, if you took half the time you spend making shitty posts and being an idiot, and instead spent that time practicing your mixing, it would probably make quite a difference.

I was about to make a nice comeback to this but whatever, you win ok sweetcheeks?

and I am Psynon LOL. the great -MB is spot on.

LMAO

THIS IS WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT PEOPLE.

http://www.tranceaddict.com/forums/...gressive+trance

I'm getting closer and closer to finding the threads I read when I was a small fry. people were talking about progressive trance's existence on TA. I wasn't BSing when I made this thread.

Oh my goodness. this is deja vu all over for me.

http://www.tranceaddict.com/forums/...?threadid=75672

quote:

Originally posted by nennon Ahh not this crap again.. We had a discussion on another forum about this.. There is no such thing as Progressive Trance, at least that label is COMPLETELY WRONG for the people Cobalt listed above. Either you're denying that you like progressive HOUSE, or you are just misinformed. Ask Mara what they call their music, and you won't get a word "trance" anywhere NEAR their reply. And what's this about "progressive trance being more melodic than house".. are you nuts? You're separating the genre into melodic and non-melodic and assigning different labels to it? If a song sounds like Xpander, its "progressive trance" just because it has melody? Trance is trance, progressive house is progressive house.. Don't mix the two together, and try to understand that they are DIFFERENT - the vibe, the BPM, the people who produce it are very different. I don't consider anything to be trance if it's below 132 bpm. Simple as that, trance is defined by it's speed more than its synths, melodies, or anything else. If you're gonna start a new genre, at least label the artists properly. James Holden is not a trance producer :-P

ALL HAIL nennon. I respect Ishkur but this debate is still up for grabs!

deja vu all over. Better hit up the ATM machine.

look, he finally found the thread where it once was said that progressive trance doesn't exist. it all makes sense now. this thread has been justified, halleluja



This is James Holden by the way. Yes he did produce trance at one point, though progressive.

quote:

Originally posted by Mattinsanity I was about to make a nice comeback to this but whatever, you win ok sweetcheeks? and I am Psynon LOL. the great -MB is spot on.

Ha, ha, I went to bed yesterday, but thought in this reply I wanted to say that this is the point that some here would start to call me names or really get pissed for not stopping.
I wanted to say, as that was still an option:

Psynon = Mattinsanity = Euforix


Well, no need for that any more, but I had my fun

quote:

Originally posted by Trance-MB Ha, ha, I went to bed yesterday, but thought in this reply I wanted to say that this is the point that some here would start to call me names or really get pissed for not stopping. I wanted to say, as that was still an option: Psynon = Mattinsanity = Euforix Well, no need for that any more, but I had my fun

maybe I should've added after I said spot on.

I read another thread during the Holden/Chable era and this is what someone said:


"Progressive House = Progressive
Progressive Trance = Trance

Progressive Trance isnt really Progressive..... what u guys think of progressive trance is just strictly trance with slight touch of progressive"

couldn't have said it better myself.

Who fucking cares?

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.