TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Production Studio
-- What goes into a "professional" track?
Pages (3): « 1 2 [3]


Posted by Beatflux on Jan-23-2010 10:06:

quote:
Originally posted by cryophonik
That's largely reflected in exactly what is going on in these forums and in this very thread (nobody even mentioned music until page 2!) - everybody wants to talk about synths, gear, software, DAWs, techniques, etc., but hardly anybody talks about what goes into a making a killer hook/melody/harmony and, when they do, the thread typically dissolves into a discussion of whether or not music theory is necessary.


It seems like most of your threads are geared toward talking about new products or gear lust. That being said, I don't mind hearing about special offers and discounts.

I think most people don't care around these parts. The general attitude is "Engineering first, music second."

I haven't seen too much theory hate lately though. *knock on wood*


Posted by DEAD_MOOSE on Jan-23-2010 10:23:

usually you can notice just how much of a huge impact a number of accumulated influences (over a long space of time) a professional artist puts into their work. So many different subtle (or not so subtle) factors that the average listening doesn't hear and comes to the conclusion that all the ideas were 100% those of the artist.

It is apparent to me that most of the very good artists who break into the mainstream while remaining of a sophisticated nature are those who stay true to their long term musical influences instead of shutting them out and/or replacing them with a short term influence in an attempt to appeal to a market they would not normally appeal to.


Posted by Kysora on Jan-23-2010 15:08:

quote:
Originally posted by floyd741
Actually, there are rules for making music. Whether or not you follow them is up to you but there are rules.


I'm pretty sure that negates the definition of "rule". Any rule left up to someone's discretion is nothing more than a guideline or a suggestion.

On that note, I think learning music theory helped my music more than anything else. I used to think "music is about creativity, who needs rules" but it really helped me be able to utilize my creativity effectively in a song. Even learning the basics help, because they reinforce what you probably already learned through trial and error.

The only people who really say music theory is unnecessary are people who haven't taken time to learn it. Anyone who's studied it usually can vouch for its importance, which on its own should give it enough credibility.


Posted by cryophonik on Jan-23-2010 16:10:

quote:
Originally posted by Beatflux
It seems like most of your threads are geared toward talking about new products or gear lust. That being said, I don't mind hearing about special offers and discounts.


That's hardly fair. Yes, I do like talking about gear and I like to spread the news of special offers whenever I hear about them to help other people save money. But I also go out of my way to be helpful and help people improve or troubleshoot an issue whenever I can and the vast majority of my posts are intended to be helpful.




edit: n/m - I misread the last part of your post.


Posted by Stef on Jan-23-2010 18:47:

quote:
Originally posted by DEAD_MOOSE
It is apparent to me that most of the very good artists who break into the mainstream while remaining of a sophisticated nature are those who stay true to their long term musical influences instead of shutting them out and/or replacing them with a short term influence in an attempt to appeal to a market they would not normally appeal to.


I hardly think that is true, I'm not a fan of him but Sander Van Doorn changes what he does regularly and maintains a strong following, then we also have the case of Armin Van Buuren though that is too long of a story.

On topic though, heres a pretty interesting write up, its more focused on i guess pop music but the site itself has invaluable information.

http://www.tweakheadz.com/perfect_mix.html


Posted by DigiNut on Jan-23-2010 19:03:

quote:
Originally posted by Stef
On topic though, heres a pretty interesting write up, its more focused on i guess pop music but the site itself has invaluable information.

Here? Where?


Posted by Bren-F on Jan-23-2010 20:03:

Love this thread.

Just further expanding on a few other points already mentioned:



Have patience!
It has been mentioned, but music production is a lengthy process. It's important to take your time and not be afraid to go back several steps in your production process to correct or fix any problems you may come across.

If the track is sounding muddy or not quite right, try soloing each individual track and listening to how it sounds, see if you can hear anything (effects or eq range) that doesn't need to be there. Try soloing groups together (such as bass and bassdrum or the synth section)
And doing the same as above.

Failing that, don't be afraid to bypass all your effects and lower every volume slider on the mixer and start your mixing process from scratch, gradually reintroducing the effects as you go and stopping every time the mix starts to sound a little off. editing your mix in smaller chunks is much easier than identifying problems with everything playing.

Be careful with reverb!!!

More so than any other processing effect. Applying reverb expands the frequencies of the sound it is applied to, so using too much can seriously muddy up your overall mix.

Pay special attention to the decay setting. If your sound doesn't need lots of tail at the end, then cut it as much as you can without messing the sound you are going for.

The same goes for size and dampening settings. unless the sound you are going for requires excessive levels, then cut it down.


Posted by Stef on Jan-23-2010 21:28:

quote:
Originally posted by DigiNut
Here? Where?


Apologies, still hungover from last night


Posted by Alekos on Jan-27-2010 01:35:

Pick a DAW and stick with it!


Pages (3): « 1 2 [3]

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.