TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Production Studio
-- Any NAMM rumors? Who's going?
Pages (3): « 1 2 [3]
| quote: |
| Originally posted by kitphillips If thats what you think I sound like I think you need to look closer at the context. I said I thought it was overpriced and not that revolutionary. People came back saying that it was a reasonable price (hexadecimal) and that it was a similar price to the virus. I said that it was similarly priced to a synth of similar concept (although better executed) which was often judged too expensive. I also said that maybe people were happy to pay more for the virus because it has 5x the voices. This is a better alternative with 32 voices, built off algorithms which are known to be awesome and also costs less. Still slightly overpriced IMO, but I could see myself buying one second hand maybe... http://www.arturia.com/evolution/en...in/specs21.html |
Apparently the solaris is digital. Totally lame -- I really don't see the point in any manufacturer making new digital synthesizers with plugins as good as they are these days. Note that I said *new*. Most of the digitals that are being manufatured today are new versions of old classic digitals... the Blofeld, Nord Wave, Virus.. all new versions of classic digital synths.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by alanzo I really don't see the point in any manufacturer making new digital synthesizers with plugins as good as they are these days. |
To further comment, I'd much rather see, for example, a great VSTi from Roland rather than a great digital hardware synth from them simply because that's where I feel digital synthesizer technology is heading and should remain.
The only reason Roland would want to make a new digital hardware synthesizer is that they either want to be lazy and re-use old code like what they did with the JP80x0 and the SH-201/V-Synth having the Supersaw waveform, or for performance. BUT, on the performance issue, I feel that plugins are incredibly stable these days and that it's not uncommon at all to see a performer with a laptop. OR, for example, for ultra stability, Pendulum sampled all their leads from plugins to use in live performances and they still sounded fucking awesome.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by tehlord So you've actually tried some now then? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by alanzo Tried? Yes. Use? No. In particular I enjoyed Arturia's synths... really well done emulations. But I'd still rather use my Andromeda and soon Mopho Keyboard/Tetra for analog sounds. I would like to compare the Q to Largo sometime soon, though. But I imagine Largo is based more off the code of the MicroQ which is not nearly as nice as the "big" Q. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by tehlord Oh, we've had this conversation already. |
I have about 10 minutes of audio tour for the Solaris, offered by one of the guys in the booth...Will post when I get home.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by alanzo Apparently the solaris is digital. Totally lame -- I really don't see the point in any manufacturer making new digital synthesizers with plugins as good as they are these days. Note that I said *new*. Most of the digitals that are being manufatured today are new versions of old classic digitals... the Blofeld, Nord Wave, Virus.. all new versions of classic digital synths. |
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.