TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- John Yoo VS Jon Stewart: What the hell happened?
Pages (6): « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 »


Posted by The17sss on Jan-18-2010 20:20:

quote:
Originally posted by leph555
yea but Glen beck is a full on retard


lol... he needs some fucking valium.


Posted by WittyHandle on Jan-18-2010 20:27:

Glenn is no retard, he's very smart, as are most of the people at Fox. It's how they use their intelligence, and showman skills in Glenn's case, to use fear and hate to manipulate the people of America.


Posted by Moongoose on Jan-18-2010 20:43:

quote:
Originally posted by The17sss
That's what everyone is missing here; people are only attacking Fox when they know damn well the other's have their own biases... so, why the singling out of just Fox?

Switching footage of crowd size is a perfect example... Fox did it, and they all do it, and I don't like it. But that is vastly different than what MSNBC did and far less dangerous; creating a fake race-baiting storyline by taking the time to doctor a video? Come on now.


We report, You decide
Fair and Balanced

Why do people pick on Fox? Because it tries to portray itself as the most fair network of them all but it gives out the most distorted message of all of them. I cant be bothered to search for the polls now (been awake for about 40 hours by now, perhaps tomorrow if i manage to get some sleep) but ive seen them, done by nonpartisan groups that show that people that get their "news" from fox news have the most warped view of the situation in america and abroad.

Another reason is that its a safe heaven and breeding ground for political hate speech and outright lies. FEMA death camps, the birther movement, obama is going to kill grandma...damn nonsense all of it but who kept it alive, feeding it to its viewers?

And the blatant affiliation with the conservatives doesnt help the network at all. Not only sponsoring but being the driving force behind for example the 9/12 rally which was Becks baby but was actively promoted and reported on by the entire network, and speaking of reporting on that, the amount of poeple in attendance when reported by fox was ten times the number reported by other networks and official estimates. Compensating much?


Posted by D-res on Jan-18-2010 20:55:

quote:
Originally posted by The17sss

....

They do have twice the viewership of MSNBC and CNN combined though... that's gotta mean something; if they were a horrible news orgainzation that simply wouldn't happen.




You do realize what country Fox News broadcasts in, right?

You're obviously falling for it


Posted by Allayla on Jan-18-2010 21:30:

quote:
Originally posted by WittyHandle
Statements like this do nothing to help discussion.

Oh the all important 'high road'

We all know how well that's working out, RE: watered down stimulus and a HCR bill stripped of anything meaningful to appease presidents LIEberman and Nelson.

Democrats in WA, including the obama admin, are spineless pusssies and refuse to call out the teabaggers and corporate owned blue dogs for what they are; bought and payed for wall street and insurance company shills.

Democrats deserve to get their asses handed to them for ignoring their base, president palin will save the day

Faux is nothing more than kkk wing of the gee oh pee, their viewers are 95% racist teabaggers who think their 'murica is being stolen by all the brown people and ACORN and the kenyan communist who would be considered a conservative in many other countries.

Teabaggers need to be called out for their hatred of america.

Such patriots, they.


Posted by WhooCares on Jan-18-2010 21:46:

this is the perfect video that shows the viewership of faux news.


it pains me to know that there are people out there that think like that. brainwashed, ignorant, slow, stupid, mentally challenged etc...
esp last min of video

edit...and yes, both sides of the political spectrum have people like that...


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Jan-18-2010 22:01:

quote:
Originally posted by The17sss
That's what everyone is missing here; people are only attacking Fox when they know damn well the other's have their own biases... so, why the singling out of just Fox?


Because fox is unique and special within the contexts of exceptionally shit journalism. If you think they are comparable to the other networks, you�re a blind partisan fool. That�s not to say the other networks are perfect or beyond reproach of course (except you PBS, we love you!), but fox is qualitatively and quantitatively worse than anything else currently available on television outside china or iran.


Posted by Moongoose on Jan-18-2010 22:38:

And while i know that this doesnt actually fit into this discussion...something for our conservative friends...


HA!


Posted by idoru on Jan-18-2010 23:08:

quote:
Originally posted by The17sss


Now I'm an imbicile. I never said, even remotely, that Fox is completely innocent of any wrongdoing altogether.


Wait, hold on...

quote:
Originally posted by The17sss
Scared people watching Fox? lol. I would actually like you to show me one example of Fox purposely distorting or editing the news in a way that is unethical or backs up your lack of integrity claim. I'm not talking about pundit opinion shows, I'm talking about the news.

One can't say the same about the left wing hack machine MSNBC, after they PURPOSELY edited this video of a black guy holding a gun at an Obama protest, cropping out his head and arms so he'd be assumed to be white, and go on to say "having this kind of stuff at rallys has racial overtones" and "it's troubling with a man of color in the White House." Watch for yourself.

[video]

Here's an actual photo of the guy. Show me one example of Fox doing this shit.
[picture]


... so you're going to tell me that that post doesn't imply that you're defending Fox? If you weren't, then you'd certainly do well to learn how to properly word your posts in the future.


Posted by Schadenfreude on Jan-18-2010 23:11:

quote:
Originally posted by starboy
president palin will save the day



did she learn judo from putin by watching him practice from her back yard?


Posted by jonSun on Jan-18-2010 23:27:

fox is awesome


Posted by idoru on Jan-18-2010 23:32:

quote:
Originally posted by jonSun
fox is awesome



See, I do have to step in and defend Fox here. Yes, Fox sucks and is bottom of the barrel when comparing the major networks out there. That said, because it's bottom of the barrel it tends to get a lot of extra flack. People post that video and then freak out because the reporter seems to be "skewing" the results, but you can clearly hear it in both his delivery and the laughter of everybody at the end of the clip that it's a joke.

Sometimes people try too hard to find something to complain about.


Posted by jonSun on Jan-18-2010 23:38:

^^indeed, sometimes it can be entertaining.



gotta give shep props for this one


Posted by idoru on Jan-18-2010 23:50:

I still can't believe that they gave that dunce so much attention.


Posted by D-res on Jan-19-2010 00:00:

quote:
Originally posted by idoru
See, I do have to step in and defend Fox here. Yes, Fox sucks and is bottom of the barrel when comparing the major networks out there. That said, because it's bottom of the barrel it tends to get a lot of extra flack. People post that video and then freak out because the reporter seems to be "skewing" the results, but you can clearly hear it in both his delivery and the laughter of everybody at the end of the clip that it's a joke.

Sometimes people try too hard to find something to complain about.


But now pretend you're in your sixties and senility is creeping in. This and you're part of the largest age group in the country, one who largely doesn't use computers and is very set in their ways. The facetiousness of the fox propaganda channel, however subtle, is going to be completely lost on a huge part of their audience. I can think of some older people who aren't going to see the same message your or I would see, and with Sarah Palin's book being the number one seller this past holiday, a lot of people seemingly fit in that category.


Posted by idoru on Jan-19-2010 00:03:

quote:
Originally posted by D-res
But now pretend you're in your sixties and senility is creeping in. This and you're part of the largest age group in the country, one who largely doesn't use computers and is very set in their ways. The facetiousness of the fox propaganda channel, however subtle, is going to be completely lost on a huge part of their audience. I can think of some older people who aren't going to see the same message your or I would see, and with Sarah Palin's book being the number one seller this past holiday, a lot of people seemingly fit in that category.


Touch�.


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Jan-19-2010 00:05:

quote:
Originally posted by jonSun
^^indeed, sometimes it can be entertaining.



gotta give shep props for this one



�people don�t want my opinion on foreign policy�

Damn fucking straight you inbred cretin.


Posted by The17sss on Jan-19-2010 00:09:

quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
Because fox is unique and special within the contexts of exceptionally shit journalism. If you think they are comparable to the other networks, you�re a blind partisan fool. That�s not to say the other networks are perfect or beyond reproach of course (except you PBS, we love you!), but fox is qualitatively and quantitatively worse than anything else currently available on television outside china or iran.


No offense, but it's hard to listen to people who live in other countries put in their 2 cents about American media; you'd laugh at me if I got into a discussion with you over New Zealand's different media stations or newspapers of record (I believe).

I'm sorry everyone, but other than saying Fox is "bottom of the barrel journalism", quantitatively and qualitatively worse than any of the alternatives, 95% racist viewership, etc.... those are all empty opinions totally void of factual basis. 95% racist viewership? LOL... where'd you find that stat (Chris Matthews' mouth doesn't count).

Idoru: Yes I was defending Fox, but in the way that points out the hypocricy of all its haters... I can just as easily come up with as many examples of the video clips you just pointed showing blatant distortions from CNN/MSNBC. Your boy Ed Schultz at MSNBC said yesterday that he thinks the Democrats should lie and cheat as much as they can to win the Senate election in Massachusetts... on national TV. Is that your definition of fair and balanced?


Posted by Clovis on Jan-19-2010 00:15:

quote:
Originally posted by The17sss

Glen Beck's program on Fox is no different than Olbermann's on MSNBC or James Carville's on CNN...


Thats not true.


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Jan-19-2010 00:16:

quote:
Originally posted by The17sss
No offense, but it's hard to listen to people who live in other countries put in their 2 cents about American media; you'd laugh at me if I got into a discussion with you over New Zealand's different media stations or newspapers of record (I believe).


Yeah, because the US� media isn�t the biggest and most saturating on the entire planet, which I get to watch daily or anything. Arseclown. Yes, id laugh in your face because Americans (at least the ones who watch fox) know fuck all about anything beyond the end of their nose.

quote:
Originally posted by The17sss
I'm sorry everyone, but other than saying Fox is "bottom of the barrel journalism", quantitatively and qualitatively worse than any of the alternatives, those are all empty opinions totally void of factual basis.


Lol. what�s hilarious is that�s exactly the problem with fox news.


Posted by WhooCares on Jan-19-2010 00:19:

quote:
Originally posted by jonSun


shep is the best thing @ faux..

but 17sss, youre missing the point..yes all of them have their faults, but faux news farrrrrr outweighs everyone elses. they do it purposely, all scare tactics, fear-mongering and flat out misconstrue the truth to their gullible viewers. d-res hit it right on the head. Its sad really

faux news is in its own category...
at least msnbc and cnn has some credibility.
i really do like olbermann and maddow..they call out faux bullshit day in day out, but again they all have their faults..
faux news will forever be, the right-wings propaganda tool.
Disingenuity at its finest.


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Jan-19-2010 00:23:

quote:
Originally posted by DjWhooCares
faux news is in its own category...


and only partisan hacks dont realise. its quite sad.


Posted by idoru on Jan-19-2010 00:23:

quote:
Originally posted by The17sss
Idoru: Yes I was defending Fox, but in the way that points out the hypocricy of all its haters...


And I totally understand, respect and agree (albeit to a certain extent) with where you're coming from.

quote:
I can just as easily come up with as many examples of the video clips you just pointed...


... I what? I haven't really "pointed" any clips in this thread and, if you'll read through the thread before posting, you'll notice that I just defended Fox.

quote:
... showing blatant distortions from CNN/MSNBC.


And, in keeping with the theme of beating a dead horse, I agree.

quote:
Your boy Ed Schultz...


My "boy"? What? Okay...

quote:
... at MSNBC said yesterday that he thinks the Democrats should lie and cheat as much as they can to win the Senate election in Massachusetts... on national TV. Is that your definition of fair and balanced?


Gee, I guess I you do a terrible fucking job of reading this thread, don't you? I've pointed out multiple times that all news networks are slanted and distort portions, be it large or small, of what they air. I am by no means trying to defend one set of networks over another. Hell, I don't have TV, so I can't possibly take one side over the other in this situation.


Posted by D-res on Jan-19-2010 00:24:

quote:
Originally posted by The17sss
...
I'm sorry everyone, but other than saying Fox is "bottom of the barrel journalism", quantitatively and qualitatively worse than any of the alternatives, 95% racist viewership, etc.... those are all empty opinions totally void of factual basis.
...


... unless you have even a remotely small understanding of propaganda, and access to an unbiased media source.


Posted by Moongoose on Jan-19-2010 00:32:

quote:
Originally posted by The17sss
No offense, but it's hard to listen to people who live in other countries put in their 2 cents about American media; you'd laugh at me if I got into a discussion with you over New Zealand's different media stations or newspapers of record (I believe).

I'm sorry everyone, but other than saying Fox is "bottom of the barrel journalism", quantitatively and qualitatively worse than any of the alternatives, 95% racist viewership, etc.... those are all empty opinions totally void of factual basis. 95% racist viewership? LOL... where'd you find that stat (Chris Matthews' mouth doesn't count).

Idoru: Yes I was defending Fox, but in the way that points out the hypocricy of all its haters... I can just as easily come up with as many examples of the video clips you just pointed showing blatant distortions from CNN/MSNBC. Your boy Ed Schultz at MSNBC said yesterday that he thinks the Democrats should lie and cheat as much as they can to win the Senate election in Massachusetts... on national TV. Is that your definition of fair and balanced?


It may be hard to listen but you should anyway, since the sad state of affairs seems to be that people from around the world know more about the american media and the issues at hand than americans themselves.


And saying again. MSNBC doesnt put on a big "Fair and Balanced" slogan. Fox does, and then still distorts the facts to push the republican/conser ative agenda and claims that it doesnt put a spin to its tories at all.



Also claiming that Olbermann is as bad as O'Riley, back or any of the other pudits on fox is ridiculous. While keith isnt without his faults, if he puts out a mistake he will usually correct it, he isnt rude with people he interviews and who dont agree with him and doesnt cut off the interview if he notices that its not going in his favour, nor is he as paranoid as Beck who sees fema camps and obama socialist death squads on every corner.


Pages (6): « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.