TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- Ecological Disaster Gulf of Mexico
Pages (22): « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 »


Posted by enydo on Apr-30-2010 04:49:

This is just awful.


Posted by tubularbills on Apr-30-2010 06:11:

quote:
Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On
So you like to visit New Orleans, right?



Posted by Halcyon+On+On on Apr-30-2010 06:23:

quote:
Originally posted by PivotTechno
research leader Stuart Butchart


sdkhlf


Posted by Ridexer on Apr-30-2010 10:57:

At first when I saw this at news, I thought hell this is really bad. And it is. But taking a look in these statistics it doesn't look THAT bad anymore.

So this oil spill is spewing about 5000 barrels per day, and the estimates are that it willtake maybe 3 months to block out. So if the outflow would stay the same for about 100 days it would still "only" result as 500 000 barrels of oil. Exxon waldez was 250 000 barrels, and it isn't even at the list of 10 worst oil spills.

The ecological effects will propably be disastrous, but my point is that you still can't think of it as some underwater volcano spewing out massive quantities of oil, it will still "just" be about tankerful of oil over the period it will hopefully be fixed.


Posted by we_R_DNA on Apr-30-2010 12:20:



"Every asshole who ever chanted 'Drill baby drill' should have to report to the Gulf coast today for cleanup duty." - Bill Maher


Posted by Blake on Apr-30-2010 12:47:

quote:
Originally posted by Sushipunk
[IMG][/IMG]

YEEES! I'm pretty sure the reason they can't summon Captain Planet to handle the spill is b/c the Hispanic planeteer is still getting his immigration papers together.


Posted by Sunsnail on Apr-30-2010 12:47:

I think you're overlooking the obvious here. oil is NATURAL. it comes from the earth. how can it be bad for the earth? use a little common sense. If oil was bad for the earth, god wouldn't have put it there


Posted by saluyamo on Apr-30-2010 12:54:

quote:
Originally posted by Sushipunk
[IMG][/IMG]


Those comics are great.

quote:
I think you're overlooking the obvious here. oil is NATURAL. it comes from the earth. how can it be bad for the earth? use a little common sense. If oil was bad for the earth, god wouldn't have put it there


Some very subtle sarcasm there.


Posted by Scottaculous on Apr-30-2010 13:02:

There goes my beach vacation to the Gulf Coast. I weep for the delicious oysters and shrimp.


Posted by Scottaculous on Apr-30-2010 13:04:

quote:
Originally posted by Sushipunk


lol brilliant


Posted by EddieZilker on Apr-30-2010 13:40:

quote:
Originally posted by Nrg2Nfinit
do you use plastic? drive a car? smoke cigarettes? wear shoes? If so you are just as much of a contributor to the problem as me. I'm just a speculator here assuming that the price of oil will climb and thus take a profit with me.

I'm also just making a speculative bet to hedge the already increasing prices i pay for my gasoline.


You will pay for exposing my unrepentant hypocrisy. Of course. I do all of these things. Fact of the matter is that a single barrel of oil changes possession so many times with the price increasing every time, not entirely because of demand, on my part, but because the futures markets are largely unregulated. So while your assertion is true, that you are just a speculator, you're among many speculators driving the price of a single barrel of oil 300% (+/- 150%) over its actual market value. It would therefore be a lot cheaper for me to do them without your interference, in the pricing.

Of course, to recriminate you, alone, in this is irrelevant and my argument only stands directed towards the principle of the matter. Although I am being tongue in cheek with my dialogue with you, on this matter, you should know that the ultra-high prices for gasoline, a while back - the ones where I was spending over $4.25 per gallon - those had a rather severe effect on my household, severely limiting already meager financial resources and causing an enormous toll, emotionally.

So, am I culpable for wanting and/or needing the things you mention in your argument. Of course. That's what makes it so irksome. In Michigan, the power companies are also unregulated. What that means is that the power companies, alone, get to determine the prices they charge the consumer. With speculation in the futures markets driving the prices up of things like Oil and Coal, there are a million ways from Sunday in which my family gets held over the barrel.

And, of course, it's not just my family but almost every family in Michigan. The exorbitant prices being charged to the consumer, be it through oil futures or consumer banking, dry up an already dwindled supply of money that would otherwise be circulating in the economy. If there is no money to pay my wages, I don't really stand a chance of getting hired.

Meanwhile, you're claiming that you stand to make a profit. What you are profiting off of, however, is so unethical and creates so much harm that I honestly have to wonder, what kind of person it makes you to post, in this thread, that you want the price of oil to increase? Okay. Granted, you're removed from my side of the equation. You needn't concern yourself with my welfare anymore than I ought to concern myself with yours.

But, really, what you're hoping for results in less money I have to spend on some kind of important stuff.


Posted by leph555 on Apr-30-2010 14:22:

New Nasa Images




Posted by Nrg2Nfinit on Apr-30-2010 14:25:

technically the fund i am in is an etf which simply mirrors the movement of the futures. I do not have the capital, nor the power to manipulate the futures markets. Natural gas is one thing, but you are talking about 300,000 contracts a day valued at 85 dollars each.

I just watch the futures, pick a direction and put money into a leveraged etf which reciprocates double the daily gains or losses of the current future contracts preformance.

The oil cartel is controlled and manipulated by opec at large, while i may be a sand ******, i do not have those connections or insight.

Like i said before, im just a small fish riding the wave. I pay for gas just like everyone here, and i take my investment as a hedge to reduce my overall expenses on gas (and make a little bit of money on the side).

Don't blame capitalism. Its what brought you the bread to your table every morning, your Birkenstock that you wear with socks and the everyday freedoms you enjoy and usurp.


Posted by EddieZilker on Apr-30-2010 15:09:

quote:
Originally posted by Nrg2Nfinit
Don't blame capitalism. Its what brought you the bread to your table every morning, your Birkenstock that you wear with socks and the everyday freedoms you enjoy and usurp.


Practically speaking, I don't blame capitalism (and to be perfectly clear, I really don't blame you). I love capitalism. I really do. I see it as a dynamic construct which allows for as much power as it does diversity. But, rightly or wrongly, I think there is a gargantuan difference between true Capitalism, in which its idealized goals are met, and a Free Market Economy, where anything goes.

The prices which rose to over $4.25 per gallon, back in 2008, weren't even entirely OPEC's fault. A very large portion of that price increase, by my understanding, was driven by speculators in so-called "dark market" which are shielded from over-sight and whose participants have no accountability for transparency.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008...in4188620.shtml

Does OPEC benefit by a relationship implied in the chain of transaction? Probably, but not to the degree that is convenient to assign the mountain of blame.

But let me be clear. Essentially, the word, Capitalism assumes a level playing field - at least in the common American psyche. There is a long history in the United States of capitalism having to be reigned in because its excesses led to a severe level of unfairness into the market. Alan Greenspan, a long time devotee of Ayn Rand, championed her anarchic vision for capitalism and has brought about, not simply the current economic crisis, but being in the position he was in for some time, helped to facilitate the usurping of other people's freedoms with the help of Henry Kissinger.

http://fray.slate.com/discuss/forums/post/3431219.aspx

Now, it would appear, that it is the American public's turn to feel a little oppression garnered by nothing less than the ideals they were taught to cherish of the Free Market. But even Alan Greenspan, a champion of Rand, has now had to bow under the unequivocal truth that Rand's philosophy was, at best, delusional.


Posted by jonSun on Apr-30-2010 16:12:

quote:
Originally posted by Nrg2Nfinit
technically the fund i am in is an etf which simply mirrors the movement of the futures.


USO?


Posted by infinity HiGH on Apr-30-2010 16:23:

I wish this wouldn't have happened but all it does is make more of a case for alternative energy sources, like the ones I'm invested in. So ummmm...hopefully I get rich from all this


Posted by stren on Apr-30-2010 16:32:

quote:
Originally posted by infinity HiGH
I wish this wouldn't have happened but all it does is make more of a case for alternative energy sources, like the ones I'm invested in. So ummmm...hopefully I get rich from all this


alternative energy = ygrene ?


Posted by Ted Promo on Apr-30-2010 16:38:

I always wanted to shut that Ariel bitch up.


Posted by Nrg2Nfinit on Apr-30-2010 17:13:

quote:
Originally posted by jonSun
USO?


lol nope

HOU.TO.. this one is leveraged so i get double the daily preformance isntead of just the daily preformance. The disadvantage is i lose way more when the contracts rollover and the deterioration of the fund is about .1% per week.

Its a day trading vehicle.


Posted by Nrg2Nfinit on Apr-30-2010 17:20:

quote:
Originally posted by EddieZilker
Practically speaking, I don't blame capitalism (and to be perfectly clear, I really don't blame you). I love capitalism. I really do. I see it as a dynamic construct which allows for as much power as it does diversity. But, rightly or wrongly, I think there is a gargantuan difference between true Capitalism, in which its idealized goals are met, and a Free Market Economy, where anything goes.

The prices which rose to over $4.25 per gallon, back in 2008, weren't even entirely OPEC's fault. A very large portion of that price increase, by my understanding, was driven by speculators in so-called "dark market" which are shielded from over-sight and whose participants have no accountability for transparency.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008...in4188620.shtml

Does OPEC benefit by a relationship implied in the chain of transaction? Probably, but not to the degree that is convenient to assign the mountain of blame.

But let me be clear. Essentially, the word, Capitalism assumes a level playing field - at least in the common American psyche. There is a long history in the United States of capitalism having to be reigned in because its excesses led to a severe level of unfairness into the market. Alan Greenspan, a long time devotee of Ayn Rand, championed her anarchic vision for capitalism and has brought about, not simply the current economic crisis, but being in the position he was in for some time, helped to facilitate the usurping of other people's freedoms with the help of Henry Kissinger.

http://fray.slate.com/discuss/forums/post/3431219.aspx

Now, it would appear, that it is the American public's turn to feel a little oppression garnered by nothing less than the ideals they were taught to cherish of the Free Market. But even Alan Greenspan, a champion of Rand, has now had to bow under the unequivocal truth that Rand's philosophy was, at best, delusional.


what is unfair in the market? Derivatives? short selling? its all fair. You have to be smart and hedge yourself. Don't go into a fund blindly which you don't understand. Ignorance does not equal unfairness. And the whole media hype behind goldman sachs this and short selling that is all bullshit when you look at the fine details. I don't want to get into it, but putting restrictions on the free market to me is almost the same as making blacks sit in the back of the bus. Both stupid and moronic.

Insider trading information and placing trades is wrong (we know this and people get killed on this all the time).

Full disclosure is necessary, but it is up to the consumer or customer as well to inquire about things they don't understand.

Peak oil is a reality. The higher the prices of oil go up and the sooner, the more likely we are to ween off this energy source and market something new.


Posted by Nrg2Nfinit on Apr-30-2010 17:20:

quote:
Originally posted by infinity HiGH
I wish this wouldn't have happened but all it does is make more of a case for alternative energy sources, like the ones I'm invested in. So ummmm...hopefully I get rich from all this


you will but you just have to wait several years or so.


Posted by Lews on Apr-30-2010 18:00:

Goldman Sachs are a bunch of cocksuckers and that's all I'm saying on the matter.


Posted by Nrg2Nfinit on Apr-30-2010 19:00:

quote:
Originally posted by Lews
Goldman Sachs are a bunch of cocksuckers and that's all I'm saying on the matter.

whatever.

They help create liquidity in the markets.

2 words for dumb investors


STOP LOSS.


Posted by EddieZilker on Apr-30-2010 19:26:

quote:
Originally posted by Nrg2Nfinit
what is unfair in the market? Derivatives? short selling? its all fair. You have to be smart and hedge yourself. Don't go into a fund blindly which you don't understand. Ignorance does not equal unfairness. And the whole media hype behind goldman sachs this and short selling that is all bullshit when you look at the fine details. I don't want to get into it, but putting restrictions on the free market to me is almost the same as making blacks sit in the back of the bus. Both stupid and moronic.

Insider trading information and placing trades is wrong (we know this and people get killed on this all the time).

Full disclosure is necessary, but it is up to the consumer or customer as well to inquire about things they don't understand.

Peak oil is a reality. The higher the prices of oil go up and the sooner, the more likely we are to ween off this energy source and market something new.


You've kind of got your justifications figured out for keeping a status quo which would benefit you. I take it you think Rand's a good read?


Posted by Sunsnail on Apr-30-2010 19:31:


Pages (22): « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.