TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Production Studio
-- post a pic of your latest project
Pages (5): « 1 2 [3] 4 5 »

Yea that's perfect! Watching it now.

EDIT - Looks interesting but I have a feeling the novelty for me would wear off quickly. Looks tedious.

quote:

Originally posted by cryophonik Excellent remix, Nightshift! I didn't know you bought Studio One (or, maybe I did and forgot). How are you liking it? I think it's the most underrated DAW out there.

Thanks cyro! I agree its a very underrated DAW, you can do almost anything quickly and smoothly, the mixer console is so awesome & i love the way it handles audio, but because i use mostly midi I'm still able to get my ideas out quicker and more freeform with ableton (especially using the session view), so it is still my main DAW for now. I'm thinking I might go the route of doing instrumental tracks in Live and vocal tracks in Studio One because frankly I don't like how Live is with audio, it just doesnt feel right to me for some reason.

How do you like it?

http://organik.1g.fi/project.png

Couldn't make it all fit but that's most of it. If you want to hear it it's the bottom link in my sig.

quote:

Originally posted by Nightshift How do you like it?

It's never going to replace Sonar as my go-to DAW, but I do like S1 for getting ideas down quickly, or just when I feel like a change of environment. I love how almost every action is drag/drop. It really is an easy/intuitive DAW to work with and I agree that its audio handling is far superior to Live's. I still wish they'd improve it in a few key areas, particularly improved buss routing and track folders. But, I'm sure those will come in time.

Girlfriend went overseas so i've buried myself in a new project, i'll post audio when it's finished


Click to view full size!

I dumped my girlfriend so I could work on music guilt free:

Preview:



Full Res:

http://www.christopherreddick.com/stuff/pics/screenshot.jpg




.

quote:

Originally posted by CReddick I dumped my girlfriend so I could work on music guilt free: Preview: Full Res: http://www.christopherreddick.com/stuff/pics/screenshot.jpg .

+1

quote:

Originally posted by CReddick I dumped my girlfriend so I could work on music guilt free: Preview: Full Res: http://www.christopherreddick.com/stuff/pics/screenshot.jpg .

At last! Another logic user!

Interesting though Chris - especially the layout and setup. Just a question (not that I want to trun this into a routing thread) but why such random read automation selections? and what's with the strange track numbers and bus groups - I can't figure out the logic of it...

pretty unorganized. I prefer to encapsulate as much as I can and use folders as much as possible. And if a loop is used, have it triggered via Kontakt to reduce instrument tracks.

Currents Psy Mix by TenTwo


Random somin somin. Still pretty new project.

group channels are the sidechains forgot to open the folder.

quote:

Originally posted by DJ RANN At last! Another logic user! Interesting though Chris - especially the layout and setup. Just a question (not that I want to trun this into a routing thread) but why such random read automation selections? and what's with the strange track numbers and bus groups - I can't figure out the logic of it...

In order:

Logic turns on 'read' when you write automation. So, not random, just that those are the only tracks that are automated. Maybe I'm not understanding the question.. lemme know

I don't even look at the track numbers, I should turn them off in the view. Completely arbitrary in my mind.

Here's how my projects work w/ the busses: Each instrument type goes to it's own 'bus', or 'group' (whatever). So Percs, Loops, Basses, Leads, Arps, Pads, FX, & Kick all go their own group. (They get their own color too). Why you ask, so I can compress, filter, and automate them together if I choose (mostly for compression & filters). Also, when mixing down, you have some control over that sound type as a whole. THEN, each of those groups go to 1 of 2 'outputs' as I call them, but really they're just subgroups. One is 'no compression', and other is 'compression'. That comp output has a chain of lightly set comps that all act as a unique organism when chained together.

Why do I do all this? Because this mimics the way we used to set up our SSL boards at my old job, and it just kinda made sense to echo that.

Most peeps once sat down and shown how all this works signal flow wise, typically leave with a lightbulb over their head and start doing this themselves. I'm not saying this is THE WAY to mix, but I like it and it works for me.

quote:

Originally posted by CReddick In order: Logic turns on 'read' when you write automation. So, not random, just that those are the only tracks that are automated. Maybe I'm not understanding the question.. lemme know I don't even look at the track numbers, I should turn them off in the view. Completely arbitrary in my mind. Here's how my projects work w/ the busses: Each instrument group goes to it's own 'bus', or 'group' (whatever). So Percs, Loops, Basses, Leads, Arps, Pads, FX, & Kick all go their own group. (They get their own color too). Why you ask, so I can compress, filter, and automate them together if I choose (mostly for compression & filters). Also, when mixing down, you have some control over that sound type as a whole. THEN, each of those groups go to 1 of 2 'outputs' as I call them, but really they're just subgroups. One is 'no compression', and other is 'compression'. That comp output has a chain of lightly set comps that all act as a unique organism when chained together. Why do I do all this? Because this mimics the way we used to set up our SSL boards at my old job, and it just kinda made sense to echo that. Most peeps once sat down and shown how all this works signal flow wise, typically leave with a lightbulb over their head and start doing this themselves. I'm not saying this is THE WAY to mix, but I like it and it works for me.

no this absolutely makes sense to me and the reasons I asked was that this is how I've always seen it done (and had to do myself) in pro environments. The but that was throwing me off (hence the question) was the track numbers and the seemingly random spread of bus selection, which now makes total sense, especially as you're mixing in to a compressor (chain)

It just thought it was like seeing a professional/classic desk mix setup with a random abandon for certain aspects (which until explanation was kind of weird because you never really see both at the same time if you know what I mean - it's either personal choas or logical order) but all makes sense now.

I pm 'd you a picture of my sister naked.

quote:

Originally posted by Mad for Brad I pm 'd you a picture of my sister naked.

Already had that one, a diff one maybe that I didn't take?

was for djRann

night owl theme ftw.

from left to right. For some reason the 3rd screen looks bigger. But they are all the same size. The left side is the orchestration and the right side is the piano reduction.

my secret weapon

slick!

Still very early days, but I think it has potential

yay more reason users. sounds like a paul van dyk tune

Here, the image is a bit big so I'll only post a link:

Clicky clicky

No sample for now...

If there's one thing I'm glad about doing when I was younger, it's experimenting with most of the DAWs available. Makes it so much more enjoyable to look at pictures of other peoples work when you can actually understand what everything is and how certain instruments might sound.

I'll post up a pic of my current project I'm working on. I was supposed to have a decent chunk done by now but automating half of Trillian and needing to play and record the other half live is an absolute bitch. I'm glad Spectrasonics agree and will look to make every parameter automatable in the future.

quote:

Originally posted by Fledz If there's one thing I'm glad about doing when I was younger, it's experimenting with most of the DAWs available. Makes it so much more enjoyable to look at pictures of other peoples work when you can actually understand what everything is and how certain instruments might sound. I'll post up a pic of my current project I'm working on. I was supposed to have a decent chunk done by now but automating half of Trillian and needing to play and record the other half live is an absolute bitch. I'm glad Spectrasonics agree and will look to make every parameter automatable in the future.

Same here. I'm a die hard logic and protools user now but my time spent with cubase, reason, acid, Sonar and ableton wasn't a waste at all.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.