TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- Trance "2.0"
Pages (4): « 1 2 [3] 4 »
| quote: |
| Originally posted by paulversuspaul ...but because the bad trance is just so downright awful and cheesy it makes anyone with any semblance of taste cringe and worry about being associated with the entire genre.. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by fredjan If you're referring to stuff like this, I agree. Disagreed on the dutch statement though. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by paulversuspaul They need to change the name of the genre. The shit music they label as trance hasnt put anyone in a "trance" since before the dutch got a hold of the germans last great gift to mankind. Trance is a bad term not because people dont make good trance music, but because the bad trance is just so downright awful and cheesy it makes anyone with any semblance of taste cringe and worry about being associated with the entire genre. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by paulversuspaul The KLF |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by paulversuspaul Dont dislike dutch trance, some of it is fantastic, but to me its not really trance or what i think of as trance ie classic german trance, LSG, Eye Q Records, MFS, pre OTAB PVD, The KLF, Humate, etc. |
I don't know what you would officially call W&W (tunes listed above for example) but I fuckin' dig it. Especially at the club.
Things get difficult with genres... I agree that there needs to be some sort of separation with the new stuff labeled as trance and the older so-called 'real' trance. Would make it easier for all the fanatics out there. But I mean... the new stuff, as well as the old stuff (both that I thoroughly enjoy)... puts me in a trance, just different kinds. Hence the argument for a different label.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by tranceOzone I don't know what you would officially call W&W (tunes listed above for example) but I fuckin' dig it. Especially at the club. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by tranceOzone I don't know what you would officially call W&W (tunes listed above for example) but I fuckin' dig it. Especially at the club. Things get difficult with genres... I agree that there needs to be some sort of separation with the new stuff labeled as trance and the older so-called 'real' trance. Would make it easier for all the fanatics out there. But I mean... the new stuff, as well as the old stuff (both that I thoroughly enjoy)... puts me in a trance, just different kinds. Hence the argument for a different label. |
What I want to say is that this trance scene is tthe most fucked up one of all EDM.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Titanium ... just sounds like most of their recent releases and mostly all electro house tracks |
Re: What I want to say is that this trance scene is tthe most fucked up one of all EDM.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Vernon Wanderer And you listen to electro house so you can say this? Edit: That W&W Moscow track is bullshit by electro house standards. Just sayin'. What I want to say is that this trance scene is the most fucked up one of all of EDM, IMO. |
I think trance is called trance because when you listen to it it puts you in a trance.
I don't see how there can be a "trance 2.0"
Its either IS trance or is NOT trance. If a track has elements of trance music but does not put you in a trance like state listening to it then it hardly can be called trance.
There is alot of music not labled trance that puts me in a trance like state. That is no problem. The problem is when guys call something trance that clearly is not.
Re: Re: What I want to say is that this trance scene is tthe most fucked up one of all EDM.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Titanium Well unfortunately here in Australia Electro house dominates and I tend to hear it everywhere unfortunately. Ahem have you heard the shit from Afrojack and Steve Aioki both of them make the biggest piles of shit and W&W are inspired by these guys. W&W have nothing to do with trance its only stupid armin van buuren who think they do. |
Give me some examples of what you think is good electro.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by djnitride I think trance is called trance because when you listen to it it puts you in a trance. I don't see how there can be a "trance 2.0" Its either IS trance or is NOT trance. If a track has elements of trance music but does not put you in a trance like state listening to it then it hardly can be called trance. There is alot of music not labled trance that puts me in a trance like state. That is no problem. The problem is when guys call something trance that clearly is not. |
It's funny how far removed 'trance' has gone from where it was a decade or so ago. It was fun as far as maybe 2003/4 at times but it was obvious that with the mass commercialisation of ASOT & other things that it was only headed for doom. A few artists still make nice things but it's hardly trance. Was on a roadtrip recently & on a cd this came on & even though I hadn't heard it for ages, I totally felt the same thing that I did when I first heard it, a state of mind that was akin to a trance, it's got all the elements you need in the genre imho, repetition to a good level, melody & progression as far as the structure of it goes. When we hit the 'uber breakdown into nothing' phase, things really began to hit the fan.
For anybody who sees umpteen classics cds too, this is a fantastic one for anybody new to the genre (who started listening 2006 & since) to see what it was/should be like
http://www.play.com/Music/CD/-/8/33...ia/Product.html
It doesn't have to mimic these exactly but the usage of things like 303/acid, good melody & the lack of stupid vocals generally is how things work.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Ian It's funny how far removed 'trance' has gone from where it was a decade or so ago. It was fun as far as maybe 2003/4 at times but it was obvious that with the mass commercialisation of ASOT & other things that it was only headed for doom. A few artists still make nice things but it's hardly trance. Was on a roadtrip recently & on a cd this came on & even though I hadn't heard it for ages, I totally felt the same thing that I did when I first heard it, a state of mind that was akin to a trance, it's got all the elements you need in the genre imho, repetition to a good level, melody & progression as far as the structure of it goes. When we hit the 'uber breakdown into nothing' phase, things really began to hit the fan. |
Uber breakdowns in trance started with Acperience 1.
I think it would be more helpful to just abandon the word "trance" to the shit music that has colonised it, and come up with a new term to describe the good music being made today that would once have been labelled trance. Trance, at the end of the day, is just a word. I don't understand why people get so evangelical about it.
^uber breakdowns may have - but so much about that cafe del mar remix carries through to a lot of what still makes so many TAs sook to this very day. the pointless remix of a tune that didnt need it - all stylized like to reach the clubbers of the time. Heck i was a kid whod just started going to underage parties and this shit was the bomb yo :/
but yeah i do agree its just a term. the time for whinging that its all shit is really over - because its definately not all shit at the moment (its quite fantastic).
the names may have shifted a bit but its all still there for those that search :-)
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Light The Fuse ^uber breakdowns may have - but so much about that cafe del mar remix carries through to a lot of what still makes so many TAs sook to this very day. the pointless remix of a tune that didnt need it - all stylized like to reach the clubbers of the time. |
i wasnt saying it was the best mix - if that were the case then kid paul wins 
Trance 2.0 is a load of shit. It does not exist. It's only been coined and made popular by the formerly good artists like Armin, Above and Beyond, Gareth and all those artists with popular shows that need to keep their shows going and appeal to larger masses while still holding on to the name of trance because they don't want to just call it commercial club music or whatever. Fuck that 2.0 shit, trance started dying after 2004 and there was a few tracks in 05-06 that were still trance but anything from 2007 and on has been an embarrassment to the name of trance.
Who cares?
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Ian For anybody who sees umpteen classics cds too, this is a fantastic one for anybody new to the genre (who started listening 2006 & since) to see what it was/should be like http://www.play.com/Music/CD/-/8/33...ia/Product.html It doesn't have to mimic these exactly but the usage of things like 303/acid, good melody & the lack of stupid vocals generally is how things work. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by srussell0018 Who cares? |
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.