TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Production Studio
-- this is what u make producing trance
Pages (10): « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 »
| quote: |
| Originally posted by DJ RANN Why has the middle ground completely disappeared? There were plenty of acts in the 90's that made a decent living off dance music - not enough to buy the yacht and retire to the Mediterranean - but enough to pay a mortgage each month and put food in the table. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by cryophonik Sorry to hear about your condition Passie. I can sorta relate, as I was born with a very mild form of epilepsy that is sometimes classified as petite mal syndrome. I had absence seizures a lot as a kid, but rarely have them anymore and they've become much less intense when I do have them now. Fortunately, there was never any need for medication in my case. I've studied epilepsy quite a bit, so I have a good sense of how debilitating it can be for someone with a more severe form, I can even empathize a bit, and I definitely don't think that you are taking advantage of the system. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by PassiePassion Thus sick pay is NOT a gift but a RIGHT ! Thats the reason they take so much from your salary each month. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by tehlord That's where the piracy takes its toll imo. Those that were never going to make it won't notice (although they can still blame piracy). Those that get big still make money from live, endorsements and at least some decent track sales figures. About 20 years ago I used to co-write trance tracks with a couple of dudes in Surrey who had a pretty neat setup for the time (ADATs, Ataris and a load of synths and ok outboard) and we used to make about �700-100 per track after cutting costs etc. We could do that twice a month if we wanted to without really putting much time into it, just selling to DJs etc. Not enough to live on, but we only met up 2-3 times a month. Had we made the decision to sit in the studio 5 days a week it could have been considerably more, but that still wouldn't have landed us 'the deal' so to speak, it was the wrong time for that big dance market. You just can't do that now. |
I liked seeing that royalty statement. That one was is laid out well with all the details. Never saw one that detailed.
I was thinking about posting one of mine, but now I see that's not a good idea. I'm doing better sales wise, but haven't sold enough to get a payout. I'm not really sure what my contract says, but it appears to say I get 50% from "mech" recordings, and less than than that for digital downloads. The sales numbers and royalties don't seem to add up. Last statement I got was well over 100 streams and downloads. Some of the "sales" are digital streaming, and I know that's just pennies per play. I'm not accusing, and I could hire a music lawyer to look over the contracts and royalty statements, but it's just not worth it. This is a well known established label, and I know other producers on the label who have been in it longer than I have.
Anyway, just saying I like the detailed report that was posted here. All mine says is "royalties: Track Downloads, Streams, etc. - xxx amount", it doesn't specify just lumps them all together. Kind of hard to keep track of accounting when it's general like that. The other thing is compilations, not sure if those are counted as a whole, or seperate tracks. That's another one that doesn't seem to add up for me.
Think it would be OK to post current payout balances here, without mentioning labels? Mine would make you all giggle.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by zodiac9 I liked seeing that royalty statement. That one was is laid out well with all the details. Never saw one that detailed. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by zodiac9 I was thinking about posting one of mine, but now I see that's not a good idea. I'm doing better sales wise, but haven't sold enough to get a payout. I'm not really sure what my contract says, but it appears to say I get 50% from "mech" recordings, and less than than that for digital downloads. The sales numbers and royalties don't seem to add up. Last statement I got was well over 100 streams and downloads. Some of the "sales" are digital streaming, and I know that's just pennies per play. I'm not accusing, and I could hire a music lawyer to look over the contracts and royalty statements, but it's just not worth it. This is a well known established label, and I know other producers on the label who have been in it longer than I have. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by zodiac9 Anyway, just saying I like the detailed report that was posted here. All mine says is "royalties: Track Downloads, Streams, etc. - xxx amount", it doesn't specify just lumps them all together. Kind of hard to keep track of accounting when it's general like that. The other thing is compilations, not sure if those are counted as a whole, or seperate tracks. That's another one that doesn't seem to add up for me. Think it would be OK to post current payout balances here, without mentioning labels? Mine would make you all giggle. |
werd thread 
| quote: |
| Originally posted by MiikkaLeinonen Please do because it sounds a bit strange - you sell lot more than me and get nothing? That cant be right. One thing I noticed - who decided what is the minimum amount they pay? Is it on the contract? But combining streams/downloads together isn't right. How do you know what you've sold? |
i find these kind of threads really sad. i know you guys are really putting a lot into producing, but just don't get anything back out of it. i'm kind of glad that i've never gotten into production super hardcore, building a huge studio etc.
And yet VST's and DAW get more expensive

| quote: |
| Originally posted by Floorfiller i find these kind of threads really sad. i know you guys are really putting a lot into producing, but just don't get anything back out of it. i'm kind of glad that i've never gotten into production super hardcore, building a huge studio etc. |
What did Shadow Hearts make?
Does anyone know what something released on itunes makes?
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Deillon And yet VST's and DAW get more expensive |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Floorfiller i find these kind of threads really sad. i know you guys are really putting a lot into producing, but just don't get anything back out of it. i'm kind of glad that i've never gotten into production super hardcore, building a huge studio etc. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Deillon And yet VST's and DAW get more expensive |
More people buying software than ever. That's very good news for us because that's at least a huge group of people who just give your products a more attentive ear on streaming sites such as youtube and spotify, because their work is in there. That for the least monetizes your work a little bit if you know your way through the internet. The fact that such people pay just two seconds attention to your work means that they make it more valuable than it was the day before.
Back on topic.
I wouldn't like to share my sales figures, too much income still on past sales (like 6-7 years ago), I get maximum 5k per year all in (royalty shares, remix fees and author rights/publishing), so they're irrelevant to you. Once you remove that past, compared to some of yours, they're simply ridiculous . But who cares after all, it's all about the passion you put into the music. I have like 3 part time jobs in the music industry in order to feed my girls, but the music industry is running through my veins.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Beatflux What did Shadow Hearts make? Does anyone know what something released on itunes makes? |
Re: Re: Re: this is what u make producing trance
| quote: |
| Originally posted by MiikkaLeinonen We are closing this company and this years set of accounts by the end of August 2012 which means you MUST submit an invoice using the link below to collect your royalites. You must do this by no later than August 17th. I must again say, second best label i've ever deal with. Best is 5am or Five AM when garreth (emery) and alexis was leading it. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Floorfiller i find these kind of threads really sad. i know you guys are really putting a lot into producing, but just don't get anything back out of it. i'm kind of glad that i've never gotten into production super hardcore, building a huge studio etc. |
Re: Re: Re: Re: this is what u make producing trance
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Richard Butler sure makes you realise how lame a producer you are (me I mean). |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Richard Butler Nearly everyone on forums is making copycat progressive / electro and whatnot, myself included, so it's hardly surprising only a few producers in the world stand out. I never get this sad / bitter tonality folk have. Take for example J00F - ok it's niceish music but is it really that original and memorable? To me it sounds worse that Jean Michelle Jarre made in 1975. Listen to Kraftwerks early stuff around the late 70's. They knew how to make incredible synth sounds and little riffs / arps and so on, but now we all want to make a lame pluck and some lush pads. I sometimes think we are spoiled with options. Maybe one monosynth is all it takes. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by clay most of us (hopefully) do this because its fun, not because we think we can live of it. im never gonna make myself dependant on stupid trends of any kind, get a real job instead, produce for fun. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by PassiePassion So the song doesn't even have to be a good one. As long as the promotion is good it will sell. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Deillon I think your music is shit, does this make your music shit? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Beatflux Why not just make the stuff that sounds good to you, rather than copy cat techno? |
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.