TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- why wasn't ron paul elected?
Pages (5): « 1 2 [3] 4 5 »
| quote: |
Originally posted by Mr.Mystery  |
lame sheep. the facts are right there. this shit is like neo and the matrix.
if you think it's conspiracy theorist to believe governments are up to shady shit, then you are brain dead - expecially since it's been proven time and time again.
ron paul got torpedo'd. bush won only through vote sabotaging. the iraq and 'ghan wars were based on a blatant (and proven) lies - the US were only in there for business purposes. they've been trying to lay the propaganda foundations for bombing iran for ages - only to secure the petrodollar (look it up, i assume you don't know what it is) which iran opposes - without that the US economy (debt in its trillions) would collapse completely.
the fact is, if the US and their allies would stay in their own country and keep their noses out other countries affairs, there would be no "terror". how would america or britain like it if there were iranian or iraqi troops based in our country, bombing the shit out of it, flying drones and killing innocents in the name of peace and freedom? - how does that even make sense anyway?!
you have all heard one mans terrorist is another mans freedom fighter? we're the terrorists. i.e. instigators. what the US does now is like what britain done in the empire days, only a little more covert.
the peasants are revolting.
more inane replies by your good self. go watch some more x-factor, keep your brain occupied.
Illuminati imo.
why do these guys always sound the same? talk about unoriginal we're the "sheep" though!
| quote: |
| Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN why do these guys always sound the same? talk about unoriginal we're the "sheep" though! |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Mr.Mystery |
LOLZ.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by rubez because your education amounts to sheer ignorance - whatever the tv and newspapers feed you and pumps into public consciousness. your inability to construct any sort of argument other than your limp dismissive "so dumb" replies, is plainly down to lack of the facts or willingness to learn. |
i was on TA since its inception just about, maybe not under this username, but when they were hosting tunes for download.
so am i to understand from that, that you believe the reasons for going to war with afghanistan and iraq? (the easiest for you to digest) do you even know what the reasons were?!
and what's with the "kid", i'm your fucking dad!
| quote: |
| Originally posted by rubez and what's with the "kid", i'm fucking your dad! |
again, diversion tactics. fuck off bill o'reilly, go play elsewhere.
We all know that politicians are corrupt, that US foreign policy is hypocritical and self-interested and the reasons all countries give for waging war are ideological pretexts designed to attain the acquiescence of the public. We know that Islamic terrorism against the West has been aggravated by Western involvement in the Middle East, we know that drone attacks kill civilians which causes recriminations and we know there were no WMDs. We know all this and we know a lot about it than you do. And you're still wrong about income tax.
"We know all this and we know a lot about it than you do."
you are talking out of your exit hole. all you know is how to generalise broadly what i have touched on.
i said there was no law to allow the US to collect income tax, which is true.
We've shown it to you. You completely ignored it.
that's like pointing to a maths answer without showing the working, if the sum was corrupt.
the weight of the matter is such, if a court ruled in the "deniers" favour, the country would fucking implode.
the courts are as corrupt as anything else in america. you're another one who thinks they know better than ron paul. you don't.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by rubez that's like pointing to a maths answer without showing the working, if the sum was corrupt. the weight of the matter is such, if a court ruled in the "deniers" favour, the country would fucking implode. the courts are as corrupt as anything else in america. you're another one who thinks they know better than ron paul. you don't. |
We showed you the working as well. But as I said, your circular logic means there is literally no answer we can give to you which you will accept. Any conclusion in favour of the government will always be corrupt, the facts always twisted, the judgement always unreliable. And consequently any argument against the government, no matter how fallacious, misguided or ill-researched will always be correct because the evidence against it can always be discounted by default. This is what separates the conspiracy theorist from someone with intelligent judgement � the inability to separate the plausible from the ridiculous.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by rubez that's like pointing to a maths answer without showing the working, if the sum was corrupt. the weight of the matter is such, if a court ruled in the "deniers" favour, the country would fucking implode. the courts are as corrupt as anything else in america. you're another one who thinks they know better than ron paul. you don't. |
ahh damnit 
Rubez, why don't you accept the 16th Amendment as legitimately allowing the U.S. government to levy an income tax?
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.