TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- My Dream Car: Lamborghini Murcielago
Pages (3): « 1 2 [3]

quote:

Originally posted by tiesto14 see i did not know Audi and Crapoghini teamed up.....my mistake...cus i KNOW Audi suspensions are top notch... and my car is ugly?....please post a pic of yours.....so we can compare....

whats the spoiler for? your car goes over 170 mph too?

sorry, i know im being inflammatory...but a civic with the suspension work to look sort of touring carish without anything else is a little over the top...m2c|

another front view with a picture of the simple yet luxorious interior.

quote:

Originally posted by biznology whats the spoiler for? your car goes over 170 mph too? sorry, i know im being inflammatory...but a civic with the suspension work to look sort of touring carish without anything else is a little over the top...m2c|

um dont touring cars have GREAT suspensions...with like 24 point roll cages and the such?....and the wing is for looks....

dont make fun of my wing because even many cars have spoliers for show...such as Porsche (which raises at like 60mph) and even the Diablo had a wing...which was actually not stock...u had to pay more for it....

quote:

Originally posted by Excite another front view with a picture of the simple yet luxorious interior.

dont get me wrong this car is HOT as HELL....but Lamborghini as far as performance aspects is junk...mayeb this new one IS NOT...but the Diablo and Countach and Jalpa were all crap...wannabe Ferraris...but i know nothing about this new Lambo..so i could be wrong this time....

i've got a 2001 Civic HX but its not nearly as ugly as yours!

quote:

Originally posted by tiesto14 a Camaro beating a Viper is not that hard to do with the right mods.... and if i can out corner a Porsche 996...which i have done....then i am sure me and the Lambo would be a nice competition on the turns.

Yeah, and who was driving the 966? All these factors come into play when you're racing just another Joe from the street. Racing a pro driver will be a different story. I'm not going to argue over this anymore, because it's pointless and going nowhere. And yes, I know my car could beat a viper. In fact if I knew how to drive a little better I could right now. But, driver error comes into play. Enough said.

This new Lamb also has a spoiler (and air intakes) which retract. However these start to show themselves at 80mph and are not at full height untill 180mph! Now thats fuckin functional!

And yeah, ya got a nice civic but lets take your civic and that lamb to the club one night. I guarantee you I would leave with more women than that car could fit while you would have an empty backseat. Not to mention I'd get to and from the club fastest, no contest, lol.

what spoiler?

quote:

Originally posted by tiesto14 um dont touring cars have GREAT suspensions...with like 24 point roll cages and the such?....and the wing is for looks.... dont make fun of my wing because even many cars have spoliers for show...such as Porsche (which raises at like 60mph) and even the Diablo had a wing...which was actually not stock...u had to pay more for it....

well just as your arguing, the Diablo was for status and looks, so a wing isnt entirely out of the question, but it can also hit the 200mph mark where aero starts to matter as well. a civic that doesnt go 140 is only getting slowed down by a wing.


quoting a review of the murc:

quote:

The short-throw manual gearbox has been markedly improved since Diablo; for one thing, it now has six speeds and a linkage system less likely to result in missed gears. The body makes extensive use of carbon fiber wrapped around a steel tube chassis. The reduction in weight is critical. Just how fast does all this translate into? Lamborghini claims the new car will shoot from 0-100 kmh (0-62.5 mph) in 3.8 seconds. It has a rated top speed of 205 mph and earlier this year, a Murcielago maintained just short of that number for a full 100 miles, capturing the international record for a production vehicle. (To accomplish the feat, a car was randomly pulled off the assembly line and no modifications could be made before the run.) Anyone who has driven one of Lamborghini�s previous production cars well knows that it drove like a race car. They were harsh, demanding and in some ways, downright crude. The Murcielago isn�t the type of vehicle you�d call a daily driver, but it�s definitely easier to manage on the street than even a latter-generation Diablo.

quote:

The car stayed glued to the road. More importantly, it provided a clear signal when ever it began to approach its limits. That�s one reason why we felt invigorated and still surprisingly fresh when we pulled back into the parking lot at the Lamborghini assembly plant. A similar tour in a Diablo would leave you sitting in a pool of sweat in need of a helping hand to climb out from behind the wheel. Part of the difference comes from the new electronic suspension system that all-but-instantaneously adapts to road and driving conditions. There�s a manual override, if you prefer. To plant the Murcielago even more firmly on the ground, the car features another electronic pop-out, a three-inch spoiler that tilts to a 50-degree angle at 130 kmh (about 81 mph), and then extends to 70 degrees at 220 kmh (137 mph). With a car like thus, braking performance is as important as acceleration, and the Murcielago features the requisite Brembos, with huge, 14.0-inch rotors up front, and 13.2-inch in the rear. The brakes are coupled with an anti-lock system and traction control. Stability is further enhanced by Murcielago�s full-time all-wheel-drive. (The Diablo offered buyers a choice of 2WD or AWD.)

all this was taken from here:
http://www.bullz-eye.com/carreviews...lamborghini.htm


couldnt find more exact info, i gather its prolly still pretty scarce|

thats a nice car but it sucks when people do this!



and this




but honestly id rather have this car as my normal everyday car! one cause its hot and another cause its Aussie and local! and its so good America is now buying it off us and calling it their new Pontiac GTO muhaha! and its a nice 300kw





but my weekend project car would be this baby! which im aiming to begin in a year or so!



heheh

the twin turbo lingenfelter corvette does 0-60 in 1.9 sec and runs 9s in the 1/4 mile


Just thought to let u knnow this fact.....



BTw a lambo is a lambo and a vette is a vette...At the end of the day

quote:

Originally posted by dj_mdma http://www.supercars.net/PicFetch?pic=2002_pagani_zonda_c12s_73-1.jpg http://www.supercars.net/PicFetch?pic=2001_bugatti_16-4-3.jpg

These are some of the ugliest cars I've ever seen

Don't post again

quote:

Originally posted by tranceDJ So was this one street legal? Probably not.

yeah it is... it looked like a normal vette,

quote:

Originally posted by speedracer_mec the twin turbo lingenfelter corvette does 0-60 in 1.9 sec and runs 9s in the 1/4 mile Just thought to let u knnow this fact..... BTw a lambo is a lambo and a vette is a vette...At the end of the day

:d thank you

quote:

Originally posted by speedracer_mec the twin turbo lingenfelter corvette does 0-60 in 1.9 sec and runs 9s in the 1/4 mile Just thought to let u knnow this fact..... BTw a lambo is a lambo and a vette is a vette...At the end of the day

what? they are a dime a dozen and not interesting in the least?


whats up with the corvette fetish? can someone explain? i know it exists...ive been autoxing lots, but why?!? late|

my friends neighbor had that lamorghini
i dunno why but we always see crazy style cars there
like the new hummer
and the new 350z
and some other hardcore ones

that new z is tits with the sport package. even more beautiful that i could have possibly imagined it would end up! |

quote:

Originally posted by biznology what? they are a dime a dozen and not interesting in the least? whats up with the corvette fetish? can someone explain? i know it exists...ive been autoxing lots, but why?!? late|

alll tha torque man..plus who wouldnt want a beautiful yellow or silver corvette with chromes for a reasonable price?

quote:

Originally posted by speedracer_mec alll tha torque man..plus who wouldnt want a beautiful yellow or silver corvette with chromes for a reasonable price?

hmm maybe.


i think id choose differently tho. just opinion i guess. im a rally person anyways. what good is torque if it doesnt get put down at all the wheels?!? |

quote:

Originally posted by Triumph These are some of the ugliest cars I've ever seen Don't post again

twat Obviously not one for European styling eh?

only the best stock cars out there (apart from the Veyron, that is coming early-mid 2003)

i'll just remind u that the Bugatti Veyron runs 1001 BHP as standard. It is tuned for top speed, altho its accelrations isn't exactly shy either. 0-62 in 3.2, 0-186 in 18.6 secs (btw these figures r off the top of my had, i'm sure u can find the real ones if u want ) I know tuned cars can run faster quarter mile times, but they are modified to the max with no comforts etc. also a top speed of 252mph. Think of what one can do if they increased the PSI the Quad turbo's are running as stock!

ok first off the murcielago was launched early this year (concept launched last year)..but its still a fuckin awesome juicing mobile


oooga mooga....

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.