TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Sports Discussion
-- The Official Manchester United Thread
Pages (46): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 [30] 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 »


Posted by zoric on Dec-01-2006 12:56:



Henrik Larsson came back to play for Helsingborg this season and it took like 2 or 3 games until he adapted to Allsvenskan. Helsingborg was one of the worst teams in the league at that time, but it all started to change when Henke came and played for them.

Him, Luton Shelton and Karekezi were absolutely amazing during the autumn period of 2006. He was playing very well and I'm still getting amazed by him at times. I can understand his move to the 12th of March 2007 though, Who wants to play in a Mickey Mouse-cup like Royal League if he can play in a bigger league while he's still fresh and in the mood of playing good football.

He could do very well at United and I definetly hope he'll be as good as he was in Barcelona when Samuel Eto'o had to leave to play the African Cup of Nations back in January/February last year.


Posted by Cloud on Dec-01-2006 13:07:

I really don't care about Larsson. .


Posted by Dj Alex (ISR) on Dec-01-2006 13:43:

Love is in the air

Henke


Posted by King Ecnal on Dec-01-2006 18:44:

Desperation move... going old... they're desperate!!!


Posted by raveed on Dec-02-2006 10:00:

quote:
Originally posted by King Ecnal
Desperation move... going old... they're desperate!!!


better getting a striker over 30 and him turning out to be shit than buying a striker over 30 million and turning him into shit


Posted by sleepydragon on Dec-02-2006 21:48:

quote:
Originally posted by King Ecnal
Desperation move... going old... they're desperate!!!


there leagur position doesnt really back up that statement.
You have got to remember that if they buy a big name they will more than likely have played in europe and man utd want to have to player that can play in the champions league.


Posted by sleepydragon on Dec-02-2006 21:49:

quote:
Originally posted by raveed
better getting a striker over 30 and him turning out to be shit than buying a striker over 30 million and turning him into shit



Posted by Member of X on Dec-02-2006 22:13:

Good victory today although it got a little scary towards the end. After getting thumped last year 1-4 there, it shows this year is a different story.

Ronaldo was really good today although with his typical flops on a few occasions. He just puts so much pressure on the defense with his ball handling and pace. It's fun to watch.


Posted by Yohan on Dec-02-2006 22:41:

Middlesborough should feel bad, as they played well enough to earn a draw.

That Ronaldo penalty... Eh. Close call. Replays showed that Schwarzer didn't touch Ronaldo who stumbled and fell. Well, if Schwarzer fouled Ronaldo, he must have touched a part of Ronaldo's shoelace which is enough for Ronaldo to fall like the Portuguese diving bastard that he is.

Woodgate for England squad.


Posted by zoric on Dec-02-2006 23:40:

That was a clear dive from Ronaldo.

I have to admit though that he was good tonight, nice immediate reply on Middlesbroughs goal there.

11 straight games without a loss, 9 wins and 2 ties. Impressive record.


Posted by Blakey on Dec-03-2006 00:42:

quote:
Originally posted by EvilTree
Middlesborough should feel bad, as they played well enough to earn a draw.


Nar, it was a fair result I feel. We didn't really pose much threat going forward, Yakubu is absolutely terrible! He must have the worst shot for a striker going. Cattermole was outstanding. 2/3 years time and he'll be a regular for the national team.

As for the penalty, what can you do eh with idiots for referee's.


Posted by zoric on Dec-17-2006 17:54:

There goes Manchester Uniteds streak to an end.

Vidic got tunneled, while Ferdinand outnumbered and Reo Cooker scores the goal from 5m. Scholes and Carrick were too late to get him and West with the win!

Probably the positive effect of changing manager, Great win for West Ham, very important one.


Posted by Cloud on Dec-17-2006 18:40:

FUCK YOU CURBS.


Posted by Yohan on Dec-17-2006 18:45:

quote:
Originally posted by Cloud
FUCK YOU CURBS.

Well, someone is bitter

Good win by West Ham. Saw a lot of confidence in their passing play like they used to have last season. Still missed some good chances though. Gotta finish those chances.

Man U also didn't have a lot of fluid passing. Seemed choked out by West Ham defence


Posted by Dj Smitty20 on Dec-17-2006 19:40:

haha MANURE!! Good on West Ham and Curbishley! I don't like Chelsea any more than I like Manure but bah.

The EPL is getting so fucking boring these days. The same 4 teams win the league every year. The last time a team other than Man U, Liverpool, Arsenal or Chelsea won the EPL was in 95 when Rovers won it. BORING.


Posted by King Ecnal on Dec-17-2006 20:31:

quote:
Originally posted by Dj Smitty20
haha MANURE!! Good on West Ham and Curbishley! I don't like Chelsea any more than I like Manure but bah.

The EPL is getting so fucking boring these days. The same 4 teams win the league every year. The last time a team other than Man U, Liverpool, Arsenal or Chelsea won the EPL was in 95 when Rovers won it. BORING.


WTF... Pompey were on top early on in the season... that was the most odd thing in years... and they're still in the hunt for 3rd and 4th... Arsenal STILL suck, after their shitty performance last year, FUCK ARSENAL... and right now, its actually a two team race... wtf are you complaining about...?


Posted by Cloud on Dec-17-2006 21:40:

quote:
Originally posted by Dj Smitty20
The EPL is getting so fucking boring these days. The same 4 teams win the league every year. The last time a team other than Man U, Liverpool, Arsenal or Chelsea won the EPL was in 95 when Rovers won it. BORING.


Welcome to Europe.


Posted by Yohan on Dec-17-2006 22:48:

A salary cap of some sort would definitely balance things out a bit.


Posted by Dj Smitty20 on Dec-18-2006 05:21:

quote:
Originally posted by EvilTree
A salary cap of some sort would definitely balance things out a bit.


that's all I'm asking for but people object to it, like for some reason Man U deserves to be able to spend more money and buy all the good players. I'll never forget the morons on here saying how Rooney leaving Everton for Man U was good for football. But these same people bitch when the Yankees go after the best players in the MLB. There shouldn't be some kind of elitist hiearchy in football but there is and so many fans are accepting of it.

Before long, people are just going to get fed up.


Posted by raveed on Dec-18-2006 08:16:

quote:
Originally posted by Dj Smitty20
that's all I'm asking for but people object to it, like for some reason Man U deserves to be able to spend more money and buy all the good players. I'll never forget the morons on here saying how Rooney leaving Everton for Man U was good for football. But these same people bitch when the Yankees go after the best players in the MLB. There shouldn't be some kind of elitist hiearchy in football but there is and so many fans are accepting of it.

Before long, people are just going to get fed up.


That is complete nonsense. Clubs like Manchester united, Liverpool, arsenal were all in the same position as Everton and Bolton back in the day and because they got lucky by picking the right manager, players etc that they were able to generate success which resulted in rewards in the form of money and if they are not able to enjoy that money to further their ambitions and the name of the club, then what is the point of winning?

That said, the only aspect where I support a salary cap is to curb the unfair spending of clubs like Chelsea who got their wealth not because of their success but because a big shot bought them over and pumped in tons of his cash which was generated by his business and not by playing top level football. If a salary cap should be generated, then it should only be to the level that, the club can only spend a chunk of what it earns through the revenue that is generated by the club itself which is winnings, marketing and sponsorships.

Sports today are more of a business than a competition where everyone should have an equal opportunity at everything. If it can be done in sports, then why not tell Microsoft and Google that they will only be able to spend the same amount of money as is deemed fair by all other companies competing in the same industry. Just because they have unlimited spending power does not mean that only they should be allowed to hire the best talent.

Salary caps are only being pleaded for by the less successful clubs who are whining about falling attendances and the inability to attract top level talent to their ranks because the fans are more interested in seeing clubs that win.


Posted by Yohan on Dec-18-2006 15:33:

quote:
Originally posted by raveed
That is complete nonsense. Clubs like Manchester united, Liverpool, arsenal were all in the same position as Everton and Bolton back in the day and because they got lucky by picking the right manager, players etc that they were able to generate success which resulted in rewards in the form of money and if they are not able to enjoy that money to further their ambitions and the name of the club, then what is the point of winning?

That said, the only aspect where I support a salary cap is to curb the unfair spending of clubs like Chelsea who got their wealth not because of their success but because a big shot bought them over and pumped in tons of his cash which was generated by his business and not by playing top level football. If a salary cap should be generated, then it should only be to the level that, the club can only spend a chunk of what it earns through the revenue that is generated by the club itself which is winnings, marketing and sponsorships.

Sports today are more of a business than a competition where everyone should have an equal opportunity at everything. If it can be done in sports, then why not tell Microsoft and Google that they will only be able to spend the same amount of money as is deemed fair by all other companies competing in the same industry. Just because they have unlimited spending power does not mean that only they should be allowed to hire the best talent.

Salary caps are only being pleaded for by the less successful clubs who are whining about falling attendances and the inability to attract top level talent to their ranks because the fans are more interested in seeing clubs that win.

It will also mean lower level clubs will always have less funds available, because they aren't as popular as the big clubs and will rarely be able to make it at the top.

Yeah, some clubs do overachieve, but because of their location, they will never have the fan base necessary to generate revenue.

I suggest something akin to MLB is doing. If you spend over the amount set as cap, you have to pay a 'tax' that goes to other clubs's transfer funds.


Posted by Cloud on Dec-18-2006 15:44:

EvilTree, PM your msn addy plz.


Posted by zoric on Dec-23-2006 16:13:

Christiano Ronaldo scored Manchester United 2000th goal under Sir Alex Fergusons management.

Amazing that he's been in charge for this long!


Posted by zoric on Dec-23-2006 16:19:

That goal from Paul Scholes is worth a double post, What a goal!

25m and volley, off the bar and in!


Posted by PEZ68 on Dec-23-2006 19:03:

There are some awesome goals theses last weeks on the premiership


Pages (46): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 [30] 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.