TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- Osama Bin Laden Is Dead
Pages (38): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 [31] 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 »


Posted by srussell0018 on May-07-2011 01:25:

Yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay


Posted by Quazar on May-07-2011 02:07:

Maria Ozawa is so fucking hot, but her J-squeals kill the boner. Mute button wins.

... so how about that USA killing bin Laden and junk?


Posted by aNYthing on May-07-2011 02:40:

To all those that say that killing an unarmed Osama was wrong. Let's roll back to September 2001. Say, September 15 2001. Now, imagine SEALS did the same back then.

Quick show of hands - how many of you who feel it was "wrong" would be cool with it BACK THEN?

If you still say "oh it's wrong" - you're full of shit. If you changed your mind, ask yourself - what the fuck happened to your liberal pussy ass between now and then.

Personally, I think he got off easy. The last thing US needed was to have him in custody and inciting hostage-taking.

...but somewhere deep inside, there's a tingling suspicion that US *MAY* have "erased" him - e.g. taken him into custody but released this "we killed him" story.


Posted by The17sss on May-07-2011 02:57:

quote:
Originally posted by aNYthing
Let's roll back to September 2001.



July 10th, 2001- 2 months before 9/11... New York Times terrorism expert Larry C. Johnson in an op-ed called "The Declining Terrorist Threat":

quote:
Americans are bedeviled by fantasies about terrorism when, in reality, the decade beginning in 2000 will continue the downward trend in lethal terrorism.




Posted by chlola on May-07-2011 03:08:

quote:
Originally posted by aNYthing
To all those that say that killing an unarmed Osama was wrong. Let's roll back to September 2001. Say, September 15 2001. Now, imagine SEALS did the same back then.

Quick show of hands - how many of you who feel it was "wrong" would be cool with it BACK THEN?

If you still say "oh it's wrong" - you're full of shit. If you changed your mind, ask yourself - what the fuck happened to your liberal pussy ass between now and then.

Personally, I think he got off easy. The last thing US needed was to have him in custody and inciting hostage-taking.

...but somewhere deep inside, there's a tingling suspicion that US *MAY* have "erased" him - e.g. taken him into custody but released this "we killed him" story.


Great insight.
He is much more valuable alive, right?


Posted by The17sss on May-07-2011 03:11:

quote:
Originally posted by chlola
Great insight.
He is much more valuable alive, right?



Posted by Lira on May-07-2011 03:25:

quote:
Originally posted by aNYthing
If you still say "oh it's wrong" - you're full of shit. If you changed your mind, ask yourself - what the fuck happened to your liberal pussy ass between now and then.

I like how much room you left there for disagreements


Posted by chlola on May-07-2011 03:36:


Posted by Nrg2Nfinit on May-07-2011 03:44:

quote:
Originally posted by Lira
I like how much room you left there for disagreements


I like how they managed to gas all those jews back in Auschwitz and somehow forgot his bigoted sorry ass.


Posted by Lira on May-07-2011 03:49:

quote:
Originally posted by Nrg2Nfinit
I like how they managed to gas all those jews back in Auschwitz and somehow forgot his bigoted sorry ass.

Easy there, Karim, I know you two don't get along but don't say anything that you make me do something I don't want to


Posted by bas on May-07-2011 03:52:

quote:
Originally posted by chlola

lol hi aMbEr!


Posted by WittyHandle on May-07-2011 04:11:

quote:
Originally posted by aNYthing
To all those that say that killing an unarmed Osama was wrong. Let's roll back to September 2001. Say, September 15 2001. Now, imagine SEALS did the same back then.

Quick show of hands - how many of you who feel it was "wrong" would be cool with it BACK THEN?

If you still say "oh it's wrong" - you're full of shit. If you changed your mind, ask yourself - what the fuck happened to your liberal pussy ass between now and then.


So time affects peoples' perceptions? Shocker.


For the record, I think we did the right thing by killing him, armed or not.


Posted by MeLLyMeL on May-07-2011 04:20:

which one is she??

I wanna see pics of her!


Posted by aNYthing on May-07-2011 04:42:

quote:
Originally posted by Lira
Easy there, Karim, I know you two don't get along but don't say anything that you make me do something I don't want to


LONG FUCKING OVERDUE, if you ask me. This Weird Al Carrot Top has been trolling hard.

Hey, juicy juice - won't you control the 'roid rage, will ya?


Posted by Kaidreas on May-07-2011 08:00:

quote:
Originally posted by aNYthing
To all those that say that killing an unarmed Osama was wrong. Let's roll back to September 2001. Say, September 15 2001. Now, imagine SEALS did the same back then.

Quick show of hands - how many of you who feel it was "wrong" would be cool with it BACK THEN?

If you still say "oh it's wrong" - you're full of shit. If you changed your mind, ask yourself - what the fuck happened to your liberal pussy ass between now and then.

Personally, I think he got off easy. The last thing US needed was to have him in custody and inciting hostage-taking.

...but somewhere deep inside, there's a tingling suspicion that US *MAY* have "erased" him - e.g. taken him into custody but released this "we killed him" story.

yes, military personel killing an unarmed man is wrong... Rules of engagement.


Posted by Xpraetorian on May-07-2011 08:08:

quote:
Originally posted by Kaidreas
yes, military personel killing an unarmed man is wrong... Rules of engagement.


so, you speak of this as if you know.
i believe otherwise.


Posted by Zyklon_Jay on May-07-2011 08:23:

wow.

my guess is meth.


Posted by bas on May-07-2011 08:24:

quote:
Originally posted by Xpraetorian
so, you speak of this as if you know.
i believe otherwise.

I said you were suspended VAR. You're suspended, deal with it.


Posted by Zyklon_Jay on May-07-2011 08:32:


Posted by Durrrtysouth on May-07-2011 08:32:

Something that I have been wondering, If Pakistan knew Bin Laden was there then why was there no kind of response from police, army...etc during the raid. 40 Mins is a long time. If there were helicopters flying around my neighborhood with explosions going off in the middle of the night, for 40 mins nonetheless I would think someone would be calling 911 and the police would be surrounding my neighborhood. Is Pakistan local authorities that incompetent?

Maybe they don't have a 911 system there, but still I would think some patrol detail would have seen something going down and called it in, no?


Posted by Fledz on May-07-2011 08:35:

If they didn't do anything in the last 6 years, they were never going to do anything in those 40 minutes. It all reeks of corruption.


Posted by Kaidreas on May-07-2011 09:09:

quote:
Originally posted by Xpraetorian
so, you speak of this as if you know.
i believe otherwise.

yes, but US doesn't care about that, they also use cluster bombs and anti-person mines


Posted by Jackson on May-07-2011 09:11:

Thing is, Bin Laden claimed war on Pakistan...strange to have that much corruption going on.

Oh and to those that say "Why was he killed?"

UK tabloids (can't remember which, scan read it while in the shops) said that they were under orders that if he was clothed to kill him - in case info of the raid had been leaked and he had a bomb strapped to him - not sure how true, but I can kinda see the point.


Posted by aNYthing on May-07-2011 12:59:

quote:
Originally posted by Kaidreas
yes, military personel killing an unarmed man is wrong... Rules of engagement.


What about a mass murderer, enemy of the state, and enemy combatant?


Posted by Kaidreas on May-07-2011 13:49:

quote:
Originally posted by aNYthing
What about a mass murderer, enemy of the state, and enemy combatant?

my bad it's not the rules of engagement but the humanitary rules.
He should have been taken as prisoner, where he would stand trail and would prolly be executed.

It would have been better that they told the world he was armed.

the rules of engagement differ with situation .. ROE for Afghanistan aren't the same as those for...Lebanon or other mission.
the ROE of afghanistan are more offensive, but wouldn't say it is correct to shoot an unarmed man


Pages (38): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 [31] 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.