TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- Do you believe there is a U.S. government cover-up surrounding 9/11?
Pages (162): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 [33] 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 »

You guys are hilarious

quote:

Originally posted by ogvh5150 Google got it's seed money from the CIA. It's no wonder that it took off like it did. People don't realize it, but their use of illicit drugs indirectly finances Google which in turn tells the government just what sites you've been visiting using a NSA approved operating system. Don't forget those annoying little shop Google ads as well. Move along people, go back in your homes. Nothing to see.

do you even read the links you post? it said google acquired a company which got funded by the CIA, and that was in 2004. way after google "took off". and you use that as the basis in your argument that buying drugs funds google? since the CIA negotiated with drug lords in the 80s? you are retarded, sir.

quote:

Originally posted by Haunted do you even read the links you post? it said google acquired a company which got funded by the CIA, and that was in 2004. way after google "took off". and you use that as the basis in your argument that buying drugs funds google? since the CIA negotiated with drug lords in the 80s? you are retarded, sir.

This is how easily its to debunk - just ignore the strong points, as in my post on "drills going on at the time of 9/11 andd 7/7 attacks", and pick on someone whose point is backed by less credible evidence. Basically that shows that if you dont want to believe in a "conspiracy", no matter how much evidence is given to you, people like that will easily dismiss it as fabrication UNLESS the government or their favourite media tell them otherwise. However, people fail to note that when you have an argument against the government, that same government does not literally give out and approve any information that will make itself look like a criminal, and most people like you dismiss anything thats not approved by government or some government-trained agency.

quote:

Originally posted by Haunted do you even read the links you post?

The relevant question is; did you? Or did you just press reply to argue nothing but to get a flame going?

quote:

it said google acquired a company which got funded by the CIA, and that was in 2004. way after google "took off".

Not like people actually give a fugg about Alex Jones; there was an ex-CIA agents' claim that Google got it's seed money from the CIA aka the Cocaine Importing Agency. You would have known this if you actually clicked the link from the previous post.

If you cared to even know a little bit of history you would have realized pretty much wherever spooks are there has been some sort of drug trade. Gary Webb picked up on this. But about the only drug dealers you probably know are black, latino or some other minority/ethnic origin but never guys in suits and ties.

And if you knew your internet history you would have known that it was a military project called DARPAnet before it.

quote:

and you use that as the basis in your argument that buying drugs funds google? since the CIA negotiated with drug lords in the 80s?

What makes you think they've stopped dealing drugs?

quote:

you are retarded, sir.

You're arguing you're not gay in a gay bar.

quote:

Originally posted by Magnetonium Dam ... nice links!

Thanks but thank the guy behind the bbcodextra extension for firefox. And the authors of course. Assuming at least you read some of those links.

quote:

Originally posted by Magnetonium This is how easily its to debunk - just ignore the strong points, as in my post on "drills going on at the time of 9/11 andd 7/7 attacks", and pick on someone whose point is backed by less credible evidence. Basically that shows that if you dont want to believe in a "conspiracy", no matter how much evidence is given to you, people like that will easily dismiss it as fabrication UNLESS the government or their favourite media tell them otherwise. However, people fail to note that when you have an argument against the government, that same government does not literally give out and approve any information that will make itself look like a criminal, and most people like you dismiss anything thats not approved by government or some government-trained agency.

+1

Sheeple my dear friend sheeple:


"I knew Osama did it, I just knew it."

quote:

Originally posted by ogvh5150 seed money from the CIA aka the Cocaine Importing Agency.

Seed money is money that is used for the opening for a new business to pay for such preliminary stages as market research and product development. Potential business owners may use savings, remortgage, or raise funds from family and friends. A more business oriented option is to seek out angel investors, venture capitalists or accredited investors who may have an interest in the business and would be willing to invest in it. Seed capital does not need to be a large amount of money. Many people start up new business ventures with $10,000 or less. Seed money is not venture capital.

Seed money can can also come from financial bootstrapping. Bootstrapping in this context means making use of the cash flow of an existing enterprise. If an entrepreneur focuses on selling products and ensuring early payment, this is the most obvious way of generating seed money. However, as well as raising the bridge, an entrepreneur can lower the water. Other means of garnering or conserving seed money include purchasing second-hand equipment rather than new or leasing rather than buying; paying sales people or agents on commission rather than having people on the payroll.

Frequently an aspiring entrepreneur may think that he or she must spend all their early energy on raising finance, but often too much money is more disabling than too little. If cash is tight, the startup will be concentrated on essentials. Even after revenue is being earned, cash flow management will be the most significant determinant of early survival.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seed_money

Seed Money
The first round of capital for a start-up business. Seed money usually takes the structure of a loan or an investment in preferred stock or convertible bonds, although sometimes it is common stock. Seed money provides startup companies with the capital required for their initial development and growth. Angel investors and early-stage venture capital funds often provide seed money.
http://vcexperts.com/vce/library/en...glossary_id=109

Simple definition:
To start your business up with no cash you borrow from someone else who'd you pay back eventually.

You can't have seed money years later after your successful but you can take out a mortgage or other loans later.

Where else can one back scratches another's back by lending cash to an upstart.

The liberal media would surely give this more light if they thought it was credible. You would think we lose 3000 troops a day if you listen to them. The scientific community does not back the conspiracy theorists.

I'll be looking into the "terror drills" and other subjects...I'm sure there will be evidence to debunk those as well.

LOL @ liberal media. When someone says that phrase I automatically know they have no idea how anything works.

quote:

Originally posted by xstalkrx I'll be looking into the "terror drills" and other subjects...I'm sure there will be evidence to debunk those as well.

There is nothing to debunk that, other than saying that it was a coincidence that the government agencies were doing terrorist drills at the same time. The odds of that happening at the same time at the same place are so small, you'll have a higher chance of winning a lottery.

London had terror drills BEFORE 7/7.

That much is true. Peter Power admits then kind of, sort of retracts his statement about 7/7 even though there were drills prior.

I don't know what to believe in this anymore.

Your brain is ripe for washing.

This is usually when your mind can't focus on a set of instructions and you know what's right and what's wrong. The moral and intelligent dilemma is where new thoughts are set in.

Be careful what you think for it's not what you want to know. Not what is right but what's accepted. There is a difference.

ordo ab chao

It means something to them. It might as well mean something to you.

magnetonium would have to be one of the craziest fucking people ever.

as for the rest of you, i like it how all you CTers have totally ignored my post re the opinions of the demolition experts

its really embarrassing what you people will cling to and what you will ignore. you guys are way worse than the so-called "sheep" youre criticising. ogv5150 especially is known to post stuff he doesn't pre-read or analyse, so ignore all his shit.

id hate to feel this paranoid about the world

Ignore the trolls bait ogvh5150 & Magnetonium. Don't feed the troll.

quote:

Originally posted by shaolin_Z Ignore the trolls bait ogvh5150 & Magnetonium. Don't feed the troll.

i troll coz you people ignore anything legitimate. you even said you wouldnt read the demolition expert opinion after i begged you. thats hardly a commitment to finding the truth shaolin.

quote:

Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN i troll coz you people ignore anything legitimate. you even said you wouldnt read the demolition expert opinion after i begged you. thats hardly a commitment to finding the truth shaolin.

Man, we've already gone in circles countless number of times. Do you really anything would change (for any of us) if we did it once again?

quote:

Originally posted by shaolin_Z Man, we've already gone in circles countless number of times. Do you really anything would change (for any of us) if we did it once again?

haha, perhaps not. but if you did peruse the very short and easily understood paper, then you could say "the physics professor agrees with me" and i could say "the demolition experts agree with me" and then we could both agree to disagree

quote:

Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN haha, perhaps not. but if you did peruse the very short and easily understood paper, then you could say "the physics professor agrees with me" and i could say "the demolition experts agree with me" and then we could both agree to disagree

Alright dude, I'm downloading that pdf doc you pasted earlier. I'll read it just for you . But since I'm going ahead with that now, did you ever get around to watching Improbably Collapse: The Demolition of our Republic?

quote:

Originally posted by shaolin_Z Alright dude, I'm downloading that pdf doc you pasted earlier. I'll read it just for you . But since I'm going ahead with that now, did you ever get around to watching Improbably Collapse: The Demolition of our Republic?

possibly. i watched a whole bunch of stuff a while back. not too good with the memory, hehe. cant watch it now anyway coz i no longer have ADSL at home.

quote:

Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN possibly. i watched a whole bunch of stuff a while back. not too good with the memory, hehe. cant watch it now anyway coz i no longer have ADSL at home.

Alright, just finished. It's the most unconvings nonsense I've ever read on the subject. Sorry. I would have elaborate on that before, but like I said, I'm not fond of going in circles.

quote:

Originally posted by ogvh5150 ordo ab chao

Hail the sacred chao!

quote:

Originally posted by shaolin_Z Alright, just finished. It's the most unconvings nonsense I've ever read on the subject. Sorry. I would have elaborate on that before, but like I said, I'm not fond of going in circles.

haha. how can you say THE expert in the field of demolition is unconvincing? i dont understand!

Argumentum ad verecundiam. Ad hominems don't impress me eigther.

quote:

Originally posted by shaolin_Z Ad hominems don't impress me either.

oh come now. you havent raised anything specific so what was i meant to do?

quote:

Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN oh come now. you havent raised anything specific so what was i meant to do?

Explain me this, in case you missed me posting this a million times:

On 7/7 attacks as in on 9/11 attacks, government agencies were doing terrorist simulation attacks on the subway while the events then unfolded, all happening in ONE day at the SAME place at the SAME time!!! What are the odds of that happening??? The odds of that happening are one in a tretigillion, according to the video I've seen. And guess what - on 9/11 NORAD, which is supposed to protect American skies instead was doing terrorist drills, for the first time that year, and EXACTLY AT THE SAME TIME and SAME PLACE terrorists attacked. Whoa, eh? Those terrorists hit the jackpot! HOW DID THEY KNOW??? Only with government's involvement!

7-7 attacks had drills going on at the same time!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5B5Jltzcimc

9/11 attacks had drills going on at the same time!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dXNjLt3vVwg

Haha.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJ65NwtbQic

Full radio transcript for the same 7/7 attacks by a guy who clearly identifies himself as former British intelligence agent now working for some shady security company.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DpPafvtJ9GU

quote:

Originally posted by Magnetonium Explain me this, in case you missed me posting this a million times: On 7/7 attacks as in on 9/11 attacks, government agencies were doing terrorist simulation attacks on the subway while the events then unfolded, all happening in ONE day at the SAME place at the SAME time!!! What are the odds of that happening??? The odds of that happening are one in a tretigillion, according to the video I've seen. And guess what - on 9/11 NORAD, which is supposed to protect American skies instead was doing terrorist drills, for the first time that year, and EXACTLY AT THE SAME TIME and SAME PLACE terrorists attacked. Whoa, eh? Those terrorists hit the jackpot! HOW DID THEY KNOW??? Only with government's involvement! 7-7 attacks had drills going on at the same time! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5B5Jltzcimc 9/11 attacks had drills going on at the same time! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dXNjLt3vVwg Haha. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJ65NwtbQic Full radio transcript for the same 7/7 attacks by a guy who clearly identifies himself as former British intelligence agent now working for some shady security company. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DpPafvtJ9GU

these issues have been examined and debunked time and time again. which you would know if you EVER read anything from the other side of the fence. but you dont; you just ignore everything like you did when i hammered you over the WTC7 building collapse. youre a paranoid conspiracy lover and i see no point in trying to reason with you.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.