TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- Do you believe there is a U.S. government cover-up surrounding 9/11?
Pages (162): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 [37] 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 »

Sure it does, BBC reporting that WTC7 collapsed before it happened on live TV!

Add to that this clip has been yanked by google and youtube faster than you can spell your name must make it a little concerning.

quote:

Originally posted by culorut Sure it does, BBC reporting that WTC7 collapsed before it happened on live TV! Add to that this clip has been yanked by google and youtube faster than you can spell your name must make it a little concerning.

do you like peanuts?

No not really but you might, I heard trolls love peanuts.

quote:

Originally posted by culorut No not really but you might, I heard trolls love peanuts.

oooooooooooooooo, a trainee knows the word "troll"

what is that nasty smell? smells kinda like...I can't place it...A REBIRTH OF A SCREENNAME!!!!!!! that's it, definitely smells like ass

quote:

Originally posted by culorut Sure it does, BBC reporting that WTC7 collapsed before it happened on live TV! Add to that this clip has been yanked by google and youtube faster than you can spell your name must make it a little concerning.

wow! fancy that. on a really chaotic day with all kinds of mis-information flying around, the BBC reported that WTC7, which everyone knew WAS gonna collapse, had collapsed after being gutted by fire for over 5 hours.

culorut=cretin.

So far you have in all your posts you have neither replied on the topic and made a fool of yourself.

Yes you are a troll. Even if I am in training, lol.

quote:

wow! fancy that. on a really chaotic day with all kinds of mis-information flying around, the BBC reported that WTC7, which everyone knew WAS gonna collapse, had collapsed after being gutted by fire for over 5 hours.

Talk about missing the point, they reported that the building had collapsed before it did. In fact they mentioned it 3-4 times and contradicted themselves in the live footage.

Did you even watch the clip before writing your nonsense? Why is it google and youtube pulled it off the net so quickly?

quote:

Originally posted by culorut Talk about missing the point, they reported that the building had collapsed before it did. In fact they mentioned it 3-4 times and contradicted themselves in the live footage. Did you even watch the clip before writing your nonsense? Why is it google and youtube pulled it off the net so quickly?

have you seen how many things were reported on 9/11 that didnt actually happen? i mean are you really serious? do you have ANY idea how these situations are handled by the world's media? indeed, half the BS you people believe are nothing more than mis-reported "facts" from ground zero at minute zero, with most turning out to be false.

so, instead of letting us infer the meaning of your argument, how bout you spell it out for us?

does it sound something like

the US secret agencies that planted the bombs in the buildings, despite keeping their silence before, during and (years) after the actual attack, decided to call up their british friends in the press to let them know that WTC7 was going to be coming down. the BBC then misunderstood that message and reported that it in fact had fallen down. somehow google & youtube are involved with this massive conspiracy so decided to remove the clip because their clandestine agenda would have to be hidden at all costs.



WTC7 had a massive hole in it (some 20 floors), burned for over 5 hours, and firefighters stopped trying to put it out because it was a lost cause. the building was creaking and groaning and bulging well before it finally fell. blind freddy knew it was going to come down. thats all. go take your crazy shit elsewhere.

quote:

Originally posted by culorut Talk about missing the point, they reported that the building had collapsed before it did. In fact they mentioned it 3-4 times and contradicted themselves in the live footage. Did you even watch the clip before writing your nonsense? Why is it google and youtube pulled it off the net so quickly?

his point was that they could have just made a mistake and assumed it had collapsed since other buildings had collapsed and wc7 had been on fire for a while

maybe they got a memo that FDNY were saying it was "close to collapse" and mistakingly reported that it had already collapsed. I know that this scenario is a lot harder to believe than a government conspiracy, but it just might be the case. unbelievable things do happen!

quote:

Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN wow! fancy that. on a really chaotic day with all kinds of mis-information flying around, the BBC reported that WTC7, which everyone knew WAS gonna collapse, had collapsed after being gutted by fire for over 5 hours. culorut=cretin.

LOL, that's the most 'controversial' point of contention in the 9-11 WTC collapse theory as it wasn't even hit by a plane . Thanks for the laugh PKC. It made my day, including the phrase I bolded towards the end.

@ culorut: Yeah, it's kind of interesting how they reported something before it actually happened I must say. Thanks for the link.

quote:

Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN have you seen how many things were reported on 9/11 that didnt actually happen?

LOL, yeah, like most of the official story .

quote:

Originally posted by Dopey his point was that they could have just made a mistake and assumed it had collapsed since other buildings had collapsed and wc7 had been on fire for a while maybe they got a memo that FDNY were saying it was "close to collapse" and mistakingly reported that it had already collapsed. I know that this scenario is a lot harder to believe than a government conspiracy, but it just might be the case. unbelievable things do happen!

Haha! Since when did reporting the news comes to mean assuming it? LOL.

quote:

Originally posted by shaolin_Z LOL, that's the most 'controversial' point of contention in the 9-11 WTC collapse theory as it wasn't even hit by a plane . Thanks for the laugh PKC. It made my day, including the phrase I bolded towards the end.

fuck you shaolin! if you were committed to reading beyond those tinfoil hat pages you would come across all the quotes & testimony by new york's fire fighters that described the raping WTC7 had received from the fire. a 20 storey, gaping wound, full of fire. during the early afternoon (ie about 2-3hrs before the building collapsed) fighters were told not to go into WTC7 because it was just too risky, there wasnt anything they could do to save it, and it was going to collapse.

its only "controversial" to all the "i wanna believe" spastics that ignore the dozens of firefighter's opinions from that fateful day. but yeah, lets put more stock in a mis-reported story from the BBC!! woohoo!

quote:

Originally posted by Dopey his point was that they could have just made a mistake and assumed it had collapsed since other buildings had collapsed and wc7 had been on fire for a while maybe they got a memo that FDNY were saying it was "close to collapse" and mistakingly reported that it had already collapsed. I know that this scenario is a lot harder to believe than a government conspiracy, but it just might be the case. unbelievable things do happen!

Yes unbelievable things do happen, in this case you two seem to believe that this building fell due to fires thus reassuring yourselves that the media can also tell the future.

Unbelievable? not really, maybe it makes you more comfortable believing in the propaganda as no steel structures have ever collapsed due to fires.

quote:

Originally posted by shaolin_Z Haha! Since when did reporting the news comes to mean assuming it? LOL.

quote:

Originally posted by culorut as no steel structures have ever collapsed due to fires.

ahhh, the oft-reported fallacy the crazies love to bring to bear. mostly because theyre too ignorant to know what theyre saying is a load of horseshit, because their "research" hasnt gone farther than 911truth.org/im_a_gullible_piece_of_shit

when you have grown pubes culorut, and you also know how to do proper research, then come back with an idea. til then, keep howling at the moon sunshine.

quote:

Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN ahhh, the oft-reported fallacy the crazies love to bring to bear. mostly because theyre too ignorant to know what theyre saying is a load of horseshit, because their "research" hasnt gone farther than 911truth.org/im_a_gullible_piece_of_shit when you have grown pubes culorut, and you also know how to do proper research, then come back with an idea. til then, keep howling at the moon sunshine.

Tell you what, you find some proof of any steel structure which did collapse the same way due to fires and we will see who is pulling at straws.

Till then I will get the peanuts and maybe feed your ass, dopey seems to like peanuts and I feel you two come from the same troll blood line.

quote:

Originally posted by culorut Tell you what, you find some proof of any steel structure which did collapse the same way due to fires and we will see who is pulling at straws. Till then I will get the peanuts and maybe feed your ass, dopey seems to like peanuts and I feel you two come from the same troll blood line.

ok, you find me a steel building that fits the following mould and DOESNT collapse you raging halfwit.

quote:

A challenge to conspiracy theorists: 1) Find a steel frame building at least 40 stories high 2) Which takes up a whole city block 3) And is a "Tube in a tube" design 4) Which came off its core columns at the bottom floors (Earthquake, fire, whatever - WTC 7) 5) Which was struck by another building or airliner and had structural damage as a result. 6) And weakened by fire for over 6 hours 7) And had trusses that were bolted on with two 5/8" bolts. And which, after all seven tests are met, the building does not fall down. Anyone dissecting this into 7 separate events is lying to you.

so stop parading your ignorance as if you know what youre talking about. the 9/11 movement is filled by people like you that wouldnt know if someone was up them with an arm full of chairs.

quote:

Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN wow! fancy that. on a really chaotic day with all kinds of mis-information flying around, the BBC reported that WTC7, which everyone knew WAS gonna collapse, had collapsed after being gutted by fire for over 5 hours.

Just my thoughts. The media prods for certain things in current events. I bet they got a message like this:

quote:

WTC7 On the verge of COLLAPSE. Rescue workers are being evacuated from the surrounding area.

COLLAPSE?! WTC7 Just collapsed everyone! STOP THE PRESSES!

Your right I cannot find one.

It has never happened, in history. Before or after 9/11.

Guess we should just believe PKC and the media who can see the future.

NOT.

quote:

Originally posted by culorut Guess we should just believe PKC and the media who can see the future. NOT.

Back on the subject.

Seems the BBC claims they have lost the original tapes after getting slammed.

All footage is archived and kept in a vault but this one goes missing on top of being pulled from google and youtube so ever quickly.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theedito...conspiracy.html

Caught with their pants down, very far down. Now lets find out who wired the BBC that WTC7 was going to collapse due to bullshit fires before it actually happened.

This is big, very BIG.

quote:

Originally posted by culorut Back on the subject. Seems the BBC claims they have lost the original tapes after getting slammed.

How convinient, king of like the FBI not revising the original list of original hijacker "suspects" after finding 4 or whatever number it was again, of them alive and well.

culorut just ignore dopey..

quote:

Originally posted by shaolin_Z How convinient, king of like the FBI not revising the original list of original hijacker "suspects" after finding 4 or whatever number it was again, of them alive and well.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.