TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- DJ Booth
-- Which is the best (and worst) pair of headphones?
Pages (9): « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 »
*bump*
BTW, the build quality of most of Sony's newest headphones is REALLY crappy! (As in flimsy, ringing/echoing-prone, breakable, very-thin plastic!) 
Sorry if you don't agree but i love the sony mdr 700dj's, they look good feel good and are soo good sounding!! get em get em,
Viodet,
That's because you have never heard a good, useful, good sounding, durable set of studio and dj-monitoring headphones. :P
Here, read this...
http://www.head-fi.org/forums/showt...=&threadid=1960
There *ARE* some people who agree that they are OKAY for specialists... hell, even I did, for a little while. Then I realized "what was I thinking?", as did all of the people I was talking about... the boomy bass on the 700's makes beat matching harder, because the actual bass you hear ends soooooo much time after the signal for the bass thump actually stops, you know?
What caused me to realize this? Well, to find out, read what Mike Walker says...heheheh....
Just read that whole page, Viodet.
Gluegun,
Ok i won't get the 700's anymore, as there are too many people against them, i will probably have a look at the Sony MDR-V6's as you recommend, but that is when i get the money....the v6's are those browny type of ones aren't they??? but yea thanks gluegun...and everyone else
No, they aren't the brown ones, they're black, check em out here:
http://www.djmart.com/noname5.html
http://www.millionbuy.com/snymdrv6.html
http://www.head-fi.org/forums/showt...p?threadid=1453
Hey thanx for that,
i had a look at them gluegun, they don't look that good, no where near as good as the 700's, but sound quality is the main part, so i will have a listen to some when ever i see them.....
Well, yea, A lot of Sony's old stuff looks a little more rugged than it's new stuff too, you know?
Plus, in addition to SOUNDING better, the V6's are *WAY F*CKING* more durable than the V700's, which are prone to breaking.
Anyways, get the pads for em too (read the 3rd link)...
asd
Gluegun & ShadySlim: why is the v700dj so bad?
about beatmaching is harder... why does so many HUGE dj's use them then?
i dont think its because they get sponsored or something
they actually like the headset
ok, if ur really picky there probably are better headsets for listening to all kind of genres and equipments
like, i got the v700dj headset myself, and im very pleased
i only listen to techno\house and trance and do some dj'ing (will start for full when i get the money i miss for tt's) and the sound is excellent
and i will mention the bass to, cause it rox
now,im not a specialist in sound and etc (seems like you are), but can you write down some facts (which are proved,not what you read in a magazine which just writes their rewiev of the headset)where you describe whats bad with the headset for listening to music and dj'ing
cause i cant really believe that they are so bad as ppl who have posted in this thread wants them to bea
the only thing i feel is bad so far is the price ;(
casue they were expensive
and btw. lots of nice facts so far (think ive learned lots of stuff by reading this thread ;-] )
GreetZ!
I quote verminator:
"i only listen to techno\house and trance and do some dj'ing (will start for full when i get the money i miss for tt's) and the sound is excellent"
Heheheh... Though the MDR-V700DJ's only sound decent on those types of music -- but play jazz or classical on them and you'll find that their bass is sloppy and uncontrolled! And the midrange is recessed and uneven, to boot. I listened briefly to them when the store was playing Mozart through them!
An accurate pair of headphones should sound good with most types of music, including classical and jazz!
asd
ok i see
i was just wondering why ppl say they are so crap
i think most of the ppl here on the forum only listens to electronical music, and i find them very good for that kind of music
i've also listened to some rap and some punk, not as good for those genres (i can admit that), but otherwise i think its worth the money
thnx for posting a reply though 
now i know what kind of music i shouldn't listen to with my headset 
Best Headphones
I have seen many a headphone in my time and I have to recommend ...*even tho some of you dislike them
* the Sony MDR-V700DJ. They are very durable, they have crisp highs and very distincive lows that make for great beatmatching! There is NO distortion whatsoever, and as for the makeup of the phones themselves..very..VERY wisthstanding to the beating and fast-paced actions of the DJ!
ARGH!!!!
The V700's might be OKAY for *listening* to electronic music (but you can get stuff just as good for $20, so, you are paying $140 more than you need to for that purpose [because electronic music tends to ask the LEAST of equipment, so it can be played well on crappy equipment]), but the MDR-V700DJ IS BAD FOR CREATING ELECTRONIC MUSIC!!!
Okay...
let's talk about bass, shall we?
First, some definitions:
You all think:
Bass = 80 to 160 hz
Sub-bass = <80 hz
So I'll go with that. I disagree, because I go with this:
"Extreme bottom below 32 Hz
Low bass, bottom octave 20 to 40 Hz
Midbass 40 to 80 Hz
Upper bass 80 to 160 Hz
Lower midrange 160 to 320 Hz "
but let's use your all's definition of bass for the time being, alright?
The MDR-V700's bass is slow, sloppy, undefined, and overpowers basically every other part of the sound. PLus, the MDR-V700 doesn't really have any sub-bass. HEAR THAT? THE V700 DOESN'T HAVE ANY REALLY DEEP BASS. Here's the thing about the V700 compared to, say, the MDR-V6...BECAUSE the bass on the V700 is SLOW, you actually *STOP* hearing the bass *AFTER* the signal for "bass" is no longer being sent to the headphones! The resonance makes it bounce around forever, making it louder and less defined, and makes it LAST LONGER.
*PLUS*, if you want to give your bass the *WHAM*, the tightness, the SOUND beyond being a sine wave (by adding harmonics to it, by adding stuff from the 2k to 5k range to the bass thump to make it a WHAM rather than a WHUM), the V700 doesn't let you HEAR those to put them in, because the bass overpowers everything else!
Just get the MDR-V6. TRUST ME!
Oh, and about the build quality of the V700's? The plastic starts to crack after a while at the joints....and the V6's? Radio stations are still putting pairs DECADES OLD (well, a decade and some years old) through day-to-day wear-and-tear abuse (getting run over by chairs, for example), and they STILL hold up!
Here's the thing.....WHY buy any of the MDR-V###DJ series when you can get the V6's, which are FAR better than *ANY* of them, for *ANY* use, for $70? A good headphone should work with listening to ANY type of music, which the V6 *IS*! The people who MAKE the music use these things! The thing about the V6's is that...it shows everything, changes VERY little, and, if you make music that SOUNDS good in those, it will sound good in anything! You can trust em!
Ah, and the myth that you need overpowering bass to beat-match? It's not true. You need ISOLATION from outside sounds (which the V6's have), and the ability to go loud on iffy electronics (which the V6's have), and you need sound that lets you HEAR bass, which the V6's have (THROUGH CLARITY, and the fact that they have DEEP, IMPACTING bass), and VERY important to the MATCHING part of beat matching, having the bass start and stop and SOUND like the recording you are making actually does!
*pause* Brandon, what's this about "NO" distortions whatsoever? They are one of the most distorting and sound-changing headphones known to man! and *NO* headphone leaves sound COMPLETELY alone (the closest you can get to something that doesn't change sound under $160 is the V6), but the V700's distort it more than MOST. And CRISP highs? What are YOU smoking, Brandon? The V700's doesn't HAVE any highs, let ALONE CRISP highs! Gyah...
"crisp" highs? LOL! What highs? the V700 has no treble that is worth mentioning. I doubt you've ever heard "crisp" highs in your life, but hey, at least you've mastered an audiophile buzz word.
The V700 has sloppy bass that only extends to probably about 80Hz before dropping off. there's a huge hump in the midbass that makes you think you're getting great bass. The midrange, like gluegun mentioned, is recessed and undefined. The treble is muffled and undetailed. face it, you've wasted $150 on a Sony POS. If you really love elctronica, and you want to hear it like never before, go buy a pair of Sony CD3000's. I've listened to every single high-end headphone that exists, uncluding a pair that go for $15,000. Think I'm joking? I'm not. The CD3000's are the best headphones for electronica that I've ever listened to. You can buy a pair for $400 at www.etronics.com (although I doubt I'll get many takers).
heh, it's funny to watch how Sony dupes so many people into buying that piece of shit. Oh well, I suppose that ignorance is indeed bliss.
Also, one high-end headphone that Neruda hasn't listened to Electronica with, and that is ALSO really great for Electronica is the Grado SR-325.
However, neither the Grado or the CD3000 are good for club-DJ-mixing purposes; they don't have all of the features you all need. But they sure as all hell SOUND great with electronica.
Gluegun, I would like to add one more thing about Grado headphones in general:
Every Grado headphone from the SR-60 on up have earpieces that swivel a full 360 degrees. But that feature is irrelevant for DJ's, because the Grados are VERY open-air to begin with - thus, they would be poor choices for creating trance. And even if they provide extreme isolation, the cord on the right earpiece gets in the way.
Thus, a true DJ headphone should have great isolation, have a single-sided cord that is connected at only one earpiece, and have at least the other earpiece (the one without a cord attached to) swivel 180 degrees - and (most importantly) have an extremely accurate, flat response. Unfortunately, most of the DJ headphones currently on the market fail (or at least fall short of the ideal) on the last count.
Actually gluegun, I did listen to the 325 and I thought the CD3000 was considerably better for electronica.
*Growls*
So the 325's and the CD3000 are vying, neck and neck, some going with one, some going with the other, for title of "best headphone for listening to Electronica"! OKAY?! Because it's still disputed (IE, Apheared, the local Head-Fi bass/volume-head likes the 325's better), I said that they were BOTH good! Why don't you put up a poll at Head-Fi?
:P
EEK!
I quote myself:
| quote: |
| Originally posted by ShadySlim ...Though the MDR-V700DJ's only sound decent on those types of music -- but play jazz or classical on them and you'll find that their bass is sloppy and uncontrolled! And the midrange is recessed and uneven, to boot. I listened briefly to them when the store was playing Mozart through them! An accurate pair of headphones should sound good with most types of music, including classical and jazz! |
I'm not really sure if apheared has heard the CD3000's or not; I don't think he has. Might be a good thing to ask him. I know for a fact that he never compared the two, so we don't know if he thinks the 325's are better (unless he has heard the CD3000's, in which case we would know).
On the OTHER OTHER hand (would that be the first one?) A *truly* accurate Can would be able to handle whatever is dealt to it...including mad techno and trance beats, and not break a sweat getting them as loud as they need to be...
Which is why I push the V6 so much, ya know?
And Neruda, really, I'm not insulting YOU, OR your opinion, I'm just saying that the data *I'VE* heard points to the difference in "godliness for Electronica" between the two is probably going to be a matter of taste and the type of electronica you're listening to. And really, do you NEED that sig?
Uh, REGARDLESS, have any *NORMAL* tranceaddict members been following this?
Re: Best Headphones
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Brandon I have seen many a headphone in my time and I have to recommend ...*even tho some of you dislike them * the Sony MDR-V700DJ... There is NO distortion whatsoever... |

does anyone know anything about seinheiser hd-580s? Are they good for dj applications? Im in the market for some headphones too and i was considering them and the mdr-v700s because they look cool (ill admit it)
*sigh*
The HD-580's are NOT mixing headphones. They are kickass audiophile headphones, but they don't have the following features that you all would need:
They don't block out ANY outside noise
(I think) the drivers don't rotate 360 degrees
They can't be driven easily by a crappy headphone jack
Maybe if you would BOTHER TO READ THIS THREAD, you would find that the Sony MDR-V6 are the best DJ headphones for you...
Does NO ONE on this forum bother to READ this thread?
i read it... i would rather get the 700s though because they look cooler
GYAH!!
You would rather get something that's 1/10th the quality and the utalitarianism of the other one because it LOOKS COOLER?!?!
DEAR GOD!
ARGH. If you're gonna get crappy DJ headphones based on looks, at LEAST go with something made by Technics, rather than Sony. At least THOSE are BUILT WELL!
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.