TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- Arggh Somone Has Crashed into my Car ! Pix INSIDE !!
Pages (4): « 1 2 3 [4]


Posted by IceyOne on Jan-21-2004 07:54:

I don't remember. It was weak though for sure. Mostly, I took him off the line hella, and he had to play catchup.

But you gotta admit, 13.8 on a stock engine with 6.5psi is not bad at all. The best part is, I paid $4500 for the car.


Posted by Shagg on Jan-21-2004 08:03:

Would make more sense if that was a LS1 corvette not the Z06 as they are 13 second cars although I cant tell in the dark.


Posted by IceyOne on Jan-21-2004 08:06:

I heard the guy talking while we were waiting in the staging lanes.

Well anyways, I'm done posting here. I'm all posted out.


Posted by KaOtiK1 on Jan-21-2004 15:58:

damn i was gone for one night and this thread grew 5 pages... but anyways that supra i was talking about is street legal and the car is running on 92 octane just fine when he races he puts in 112 octane race fuel.. and he does use the car as a daily driver he has been the past 3 years with no probs.. as for my car believe what you want i really dont give a damn and i have a lot more than just a intake and exhuast


Posted by MChat on Jan-21-2004 16:01:

I've found that there are a lot of people that own "fast" cars that don't know how to drive them. Occasionally these people show up at the track and spend the first 3 seconds of thier run roasting the tires at the launch pad. The '03 Cobra I ran against pulled something like a 3.5 short time. Some people just have to learn the hard way that traction on the strip isn't like traction on the street. He did eventually get better, by the end of the night he was running 13.8's.

The quicker the car is the worse effect a "bad" driver seems to have on the ET.

For instance I've seen:

SRT-4 run high 14's
Evo VIII run low 14's
WRX STi run low 14's
Cobra run high 13's
Viper run low 13's


Also for someone that talks alot of smack about other people's cars here, you've never mentioned what you drive.


Posted by biznology on Jan-21-2004 16:55:

ugh...so after all that fag bashing all we arrived at is 'some drivers suck' and 'so do their cars, occasionally'...



and this is what my friends do on car forums...its really quite lame. way to use the internet to argue over something that in most instances cant be proven at all!

i also like how drag racing has been deemed the ultimate in driving performance...what about turning guys?

or to quote vin diesel - 'I only live life one quarter mile at a time...'

so badass|


Posted by MChat on Jan-21-2004 18:27:

quote:
Originally posted by biznology
i also like how drag racing has been deemed the ultimate in driving performance...what about turning guys?

1/4 mile tracks are all basically the same. Road Course/AutoX tracks vary alot in length, number and difficulty of turns, hills, etc... That makes comparing cars based on the lap times at the local track useless. I might get a 35 second best lap at the AutoX track local to me that is simple and short; how do we compare that number to someone who's local track is longer and more complex and he runs a 58 second best lap? Unless the two cars are run on the same track it just doesn't work.


Posted by biznology on Jan-21-2004 18:42:

quote:
Originally posted by MChat
... Unless the two cars are run on the same track it just doesn't work.


Yah but at least then there are two physical cars to compare. Sure 1/4 mile times, 0-60, and all the rest are good for comparison when professional, consistent drivers are involved.

Within this thread you have all acknowledged that you are racing people who cant drive, yet you all talk shit about the cars - not the drivers|


Posted by MChat on Jan-21-2004 20:06:

quote:
Originally posted by biznology
Within this thread you have all acknowledged that you are racing people who cant drive, yet you all talk shit about the cars - not the drivers|

Show me where I have criticized a particular car. All I have said is alot of V8 powered cars are not as fast as alot of people think they are, and that the "factory" cars that are truly fast often have drivers that are not. This is not conjecture, this is my observation.


Posted by TeKnoHe@d2025 on Jan-21-2004 20:17:

quote:
Originally posted by biznology
Yah but at least then there are two physical cars to compare. Sure 1/4 mile times, 0-60, and all the rest are good for comparison when professional, consistent drivers are involved.


Elevation has ALOT to do with it too. A car running in say a place like Denver (high elevation) isn't going to perform anywhere near as well as if it were running on the east coast (lower elevation) for example.


Posted by biznology on Jan-21-2004 23:11:

quote:
Originally posted by TeKnoHe@d2025
Elevation has ALOT to do with it too. A car running in say a place like Denver (high elevation) isn't going to perform anywhere near as well as if it were running on the east coast (lower elevation) for example.


Tell me about it - I usually race in Denver. My dads small-block-Buick-v8-Triumph Spitfire is still hella fun to drive. It doesnt have a speedo tho, and its not street legal, so I cant internet-thug with it sadly|


Posted by djSlain on Jan-21-2004 23:41:

quote:
Originally posted by biznology

i also like how drag racing has been deemed the ultimate in driving performance...what about turning guys?


drifting is awesome. of course, i don't know how to do it, but i was able to pick up an english dubbed The Drift Bible. good techniques


Posted by DiMethGuy on Jan-26-2004 23:19:

Dizamn.

I actually read all 6 pages of this trainwreck. My head hurts.

I have a 96 Olds Aurora 4.0L V8 and a 69 Dodge Charger R/T 440V8.

And if I couldn't beat you in a race I could crash into your ricer plastic garbage-ola and kill you, dead. Teehehe.

Big beats small. 'nuff said.


Pages (4): « 1 2 3 [4]

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.