TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- Marcus Schulz vs.....?
Pages (4): « 1 2 3 [4]


Posted by Greedy on Feb-20-2004 14:22:

yep


Posted by noikeee on Feb-20-2004 14:43:

quote:
Originally posted by Ste
yeh, its so deep that it all sounds pretty much the same...


wob wob wob *filtered vocalllllllll* *sparkly ambience* wob wob *repeating 4 note melody in a deep style synth.* wob wob wob


trance sounds all the same. your tech-hard-trance sounds all the same. pretty much every genre follows the same formula, and prog isn't the worst of them. your point?


Posted by Ste on Feb-20-2004 14:56:

hmm lets see.

ronald ven den bueken - timeless (rvdb mix)

and

relocate - waterfall




holy shit batman, this tunes dont sound the same at all....


or how about tiesto - traffic, or right of way, or etc....


Posted by Bouma-Bros on Feb-20-2004 15:06:

quote:
Originally posted by Ste
hmm lets see.

ronald ven den bueken - timeless (rvdb mix)

and

relocate - waterfall




holy shit batman, this tunes dont sound the same at all....


or how about tiesto - traffic, or right of way, or etc....



Posted by noikeee on Feb-20-2004 15:51:

quote:
Originally posted by Ste
hmm lets see.

ronald ven den bueken - timeless (rvdb mix)

and

relocate - waterfall




holy shit batman, this tunes dont sound the same at all....


hmm lets see.

azior - deep and inside

and

holden - a break in the clouds (main mix)

holy shit batman, this tunes dont sound the same at all.... - and both of them have 'depth', holden's track is quite danceable as well

one thing that i don't understand: why with so many threads talking about prog everyday in this board, a certain bunch of people suddenly come with the 'prog is so boring i sleep' argument when it's about markus schulz?

btw, this is getting too much a lame 'prog vs trance' thing, i like both, they're both great in their own way. the only reason i started this was cause you people started jumping onto bashing prog.


Posted by Ian on Feb-20-2004 16:29:




just cos im bored


Posted by Elevation on Feb-20-2004 16:37:

Behold, my arse.

quote:
Originally posted by beema
Tiesto is a fuckwad

there, I said it

Pio, I really don't see why you made that original comment. It was very harsh and extremely uncalled for. I think Mike's mixing sucks too, but ffs, he is spending tons of time producing great tracks, while going to highschool, and he is only 17 and hasn't been spinning very long!

Whatever, let's get back on topic, shall we?



not taking offence to this particular post - (because hes obviously my webmaster and good friend)
if anyone wanted to know....
<

my mixing isnt what it used to be a few years ago when noone knew who i was...oh well, i suppose i should give up my 2 hour time slot to Tyler M ...??

btw..my most recent set was the Trancesphere birthday bash......was it really that bad?????

o well, also relating to mixing.....people shouldnt expect a pro tools quality mix/ set from a DJ every time he/she spins...its something we all posess called "human flaw" ..keep that in mind next time you are listening to someone mix ...


Posted by DarkAngel on Feb-20-2004 17:06:

I used to not think much of Markus....until I saw him at Space. My view on him was forever changed. He is really good and I totally underestimated him...that's a weakness of mine sometimes, but anyway. He was the opening dj for Paul van Dyk on 11/22/03, but he had the place going INSANE, and I don't see that often with opening DJs. When he was finishing his set, people were going even crazier, yours truly included. The guy HAS to be good if Paul van Dyk ASKED for him to precede him, not to mention, Markus going on tour with Armin, and to GODSKITCHEN, of all places. OWNAGE.


Posted by Streakfury on Feb-20-2004 22:31:

quote:
Originally posted by Ste
i used to be like that, i went through a prog phase a while ago back when prog boomed i nthe uk (late 2000ish) and i was like ,what is this? i quickly grew out of it though when realising it is a genre with the depth of a childrens swimming pool. mayeb the people who have been newly exposed to it will realise after a year or so too...


I imagine it was pretty shallow three years ago, but I'd hardly say that now. Considering how far every other genre has come in the last three years, it's unfair to say that prog hasn't evolved in much the same way. I have started listening to prog only recently, but I'm perfectly capable of seeing a genre of music for what it is after a short while, so I dont think I'll be "growing out" of it any time soon.

quote:
Originally posted by Ste
and im sorry, but:



...makes no sence, a dj is for a club, if you want something to listen to at home you get someone to compose something.


[grammer whore]
** sense **
[/grammer whore]

I think it makes perfect sense. I personally would find prog fairly hard to dance to in a club because it's slow, but I find it relaxing to listen to while at home working (or whatever).


Posted by fitom tiel on Feb-20-2004 22:40:

quote:
Originally posted by Ian^



just cos im bored



Batman: and then you wonder why you're only the sidekick.





haha. genre elitism.
it's all a matter of taste.


Posted by Ian on Feb-20-2004 23:26:

quote:
Originally posted by emono
Batman: and then you wonder why you're only the sidekick.





haha. genre elitism.
it's all a matter of taste.



exactly...


Pages (4): « 1 2 3 [4]

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.