Requeim for a Dream - TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- Requeim for a Dream
Pages (4): « 1 2 3 [4]

Posted by Z1D on Feb-22-2003 21:41:

I would hardly call Apocalypse Now mickey mouse compared to Requiem for a Dream...

Posted by Dumbum on Feb-22-2003 23:07:

soundtrack? what soundtrack? its just one track playing over and over and over and over.... BTW this track has a great remix from paul oakenfold. Its called zoo york and its in his Bunkka album. I cant believe none of you has heard it...

Posted by Linx_da_cat on Feb-22-2003 23:26:

quote:
Originally posted by Dumbum
soundtrack? what soundtrack? its just one track playing over and over and over and over.... BTW this track has a great remix from paul oakenfold. Its called zoo york and its in his Bunkka album. I cant believe none of you has heard it...

most of the TAs on here HAVE heard it

Posted by TrAnCeAkI on Feb-23-2003 03:31:

I just saw the movie and must say it is weird but i think it has alot of meaning in it!!!it was a relly good movie!! not one of my faves but it was good!

Posted by sothis on Feb-23-2003 11:29:

someone who has seen both the regular version, and the unrated version, please tell me what the difference is? i want to buy the dvd but didnt know if its worth getting the unrated (directors cut) or not.

Posted by BLuEOcEaN420 on Feb-23-2003 15:06:

quote:
Originally posted by sothis
someone who has seen both the regular version, and the unrated version, please tell me what the difference is? i want to buy the dvd but didnt know if its worth getting the unrated (directors cut) or not.

what i noticed in the difference btwn directors cut and the edited one is that the directors cut is ALOT more graphic. though the edited one gets the message across the DC is alot more profound b/c of the graphic nature. but then again, i may have noticed more things in the directors cut b/c i saw that after i watched the edited one and u know how u usually tend to notice details when watching movies more than once...

2 things (scenes) i noticed that were alot more graphic in the directors cut but im not gonna mention them cuz i dont want to spoil it lol...

-BLuEOcEaN420

Posted by daydreamer on Feb-23-2003 15:30:

just finished seeing it

took you guys advice and rented it. not bad. didn't really care for his mom though.

late
dreamer

Posted by TranceSeeker on Feb-23-2003 15:36:

MONSTER OF A MOVIE !

Posted by Konijn on Feb-23-2003 16:41:

quote:
Originally posted by BLuEOcEaN420
what i noticed in the difference btwn directors cut and the edited one is that the directors cut is ALOT more graphic. though the edited one gets the message across the DC is alot more profound b/c of the graphic nature. but then again, i may have noticed more things in the directors cut b/c i saw that after i watched the edited one and u know how u usually tend to notice details when watching movies more than once...

2 things (scenes) i noticed that were alot more graphic in the directors cut but im not gonna mention them cuz i dont want to spoil it lol...

-BLuEOcEaN420

The only differences were in the grahic last scenes, where the whole movie comes together. It's too bad that Brad Pitt walked off the set of Aronofsky's next movie cause it was supposed to be another mindblower...

Posted by Christopher B on Feb-23-2003 19:20:

Requiem for a Dream is a fantastic movie! It is gripping, it brings across a powerful message, and the movie is extremely well put together on a technical level. Very few movies have touched me as deeply as this one did. Although the story is tragic and may ruin the rest of your day, it is more than worth at least one viewing.

I feel compelled to check out some of the director's other projects, such as "Pi". The man is clearly a genius at the art of film-making

Posted by CrackedLcd on Feb-24-2003 02:57:

I think it was a kick ass movie. A bit of a mind fuck...watched it early in the morning after coming in from the club....

Pages (4): « 1 2 3 [4]