Bush / Kerry Debate - TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- Bush / Kerry Debate
Pages (5): « 1 2 3 [4] 5 »

Posted by h202h on Oct-01-2004 02:15:

awww they had a laugh together....

Posted by Vlad on Oct-01-2004 02:16:

quote:
Originally posted by h202h
awww they had a laugh together....

Yea, I know... that was cute.

Posted by rabbitjoker on Oct-01-2004 02:19:

quote:
Originally posted by Vlad
Yea, I know... that was cute.

/me can't wait for the jell-o wrestling.

Posted by ZinG on Oct-01-2004 02:19:

Im yawning, Bush reading his papers slowly man...cmon!

Posted by h202h on Oct-01-2004 02:22:

i love it, "vladimer" G. Dubya Bush

Posted by matty on Oct-01-2004 02:22:

Has anything been said about the US itself, besides protecting it from terrorist attacks?

Posted by ZinG on Oct-01-2004 02:23:

quote:
Originally posted by h202h
i love it, "vladimer" G. Dubya Bush

and hes not answering the question...

Posted by xKaoSx on Oct-01-2004 02:24:

This whole debate is only on Terror and Homeland Security- supposed to be

Posted by rabbitjoker on Oct-01-2004 02:24:

quote:
Originally posted by che
Has anything been said about the US itself, besides protecting it from terrorist attacks?

The focus of this debate is national security and the war on terrorism..

Posted by xKaoSx on Oct-01-2004 02:25:

wow-
bush really blew that last impression answer
fuck

Posted by matty on Oct-01-2004 02:25:

quote:
Originally posted by xKaoSx
This whole debate is only on Terror and Homeland Security- supposed to be

Ahh i missed that...my bad

Posted by BadBadNeil on Oct-01-2004 02:28:

This would be much more interesting if they gave them weapons and let them interrupt each other.

Posted by matty on Oct-01-2004 02:28:

I fought for my country as a young boy and i'll fight for it now.....i like that

Posted by Vlad on Oct-01-2004 02:28:

quote:
Originally posted by BadBadNeil
This would be much more interesting if they gave them weapons and let them interrupt each other.

I wonder what Bushs' face would look like if he got shocked with 10000 volts.

Posted by matty on Oct-01-2004 02:29:

quote:
Originally posted by BadBadNeil
This would be much more interesting if they gave them weapons and let them interrupt each other.

NRA style

Posted by xKaoSx on Oct-01-2004 02:29:

quote:
Originally posted by che
I fought for my country as a young boy and i'll fight for it now.....i like that

yea
that was pretty good

Posted by rabbitjoker on Oct-01-2004 02:31:

quote:
Originally posted by che
I fought for my country as a young boy and

then I condemned it (publicly) for going to war in the first place...

And now here I am running for president using the same thing I condemned as a reson for voting for me...

-----------------

This sums up Kerry. Perpetually conflicted over everything.

Posted by xKaoSx on Oct-01-2004 02:34:

lol @ FOX News

Bush's Unmixed message about Kerry Mixed message

Posted by Vlad on Oct-01-2004 02:34:

Does John Edwards have a cold sore?

Posted by imokruok on Oct-01-2004 02:41:

Tim Russert: "I think we saw good performances from both candidates tonight, staying on message. They have made their cases and have two different views. It is up to the voters."

Bob Schieffer: "What the American people saw tonight was a good debate that no one expected. I think both sides can legitimately claim that they have successfully stated their message."

Ceci Connolly: "Both Bush and Kerry took different approaches to this debate, and each adequately appealed to their base."

Posted by Endlesswave on Oct-01-2004 03:12:

quote:
Originally posted by rabbitjoker
I just have a question:

When will the average democrat finally realize that there are more important reasons for liberating Iraq than getting rid of WMD (say global economic stability due to the continual flow of oil, say the reduction of the world's reliance on the Sauds, say a global and central location for stabilization in the middle east, etc, etc, etc).

WMD aren't everything. I wish democrats would wake up and think a little bigger.

DISCLAIMER: My party affiliation is "unaffiliated"

The point is they based the entire reason for going to war over that assumption. It was an ASSUMPTION. They had no real proof for the existence of WMDs yet they went in anyway. Why did they have to lie about it?

Posted by smuncky on Oct-01-2004 03:12:

quote:
Originally posted by che
I'm just waiting for the Debate Analysis on the daily Show....should be hilarious

yes YES!

aahah so am i!

i cant wait

Posted by Cyrus King on Oct-01-2004 03:20:

quote:
Originally posted by rabbitjoker
I just have a question:

When will the average democrat finally realize that there are more important reasons for liberating Iraq than getting rid of WMD (say global economic stability due to the continual flow of oil, say the reduction of the world's reliance on the Sauds, say a global and central location for stabilization in the middle east, etc, etc, etc).

WMD aren't everything. I wish democrats would wake up and think a little bigger.

DISCLAIMER: My party affiliation is "unaffiliated"

lets attack nations for their resources, kill thousands of people,,, so you can drive your car more efficiently and corporations can reap the benefits. Afterall.. it does help the economy.

Posted by xKaoSx on Oct-01-2004 03:26:

The simple fact is- Bush should have owned Kerry in this debate on Homeland Security and Terrorism. No one can say he did. At best they say they split. The next 2 debates Kerry will have a decided advantage and it might swing drastically. Bush is not really in touch with domestic issues and I cant imagine bush in a "town hall" setting.

Should be interesting.

Posted by Massive84 on Oct-01-2004 12:48:

can i download this anywhere? i would like to see it.

Pages (5): « 1 2 3 [4] 5 »