TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- The US Election & Politics Thread
Pages (9): « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 »
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Omegasox Do you even think before you post?  |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Omegasox Do you even think before you post? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Gholy Host Bush = Wars Bush = -Allies Bush - Enough Troops - Allies = Draft Draft = You Sent off to Die => Bush - Enough Troops + Bush = You Sent off to Die Looks like he was thinking to me! |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Gholy Host Bush = Wars Bush = -Allies Bush - Enough Troops - Allies = Draft Draft = You Sent off to Die => Bush - Enough Troops + Bush = You Sent off to Die Looks like he was thinking to me! |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Gholy Host Bush = Wars Bush = -Allies Bush - Enough Troops - Allies = Draft Draft = You Sent off to Die => Bush - Enough Troops + Bush = You Sent off to Die Looks like he was thinking to me! |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by AwakenedAddict Draft --> Me giving up my US citizenship |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Aristronica you sent off to die + enough troops = 2 bush??? 2 bush = wars - allies.... 2 bush + allies = wars ...i can keep going |
math is fun 
If they reinstate the draft, all the Bush voters should be drafted first.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by UWM Damnit you beat me to it! |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Scottaculous If they reinstate the draft, all the Bush voters should be drafted first. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Gholy Host It appears the stereotype that most Trance lovers are math majors is verified. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Scottaculous If they reinstate the draft, all the Bush voters should be drafted first. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by d0uble h3lix and most likely would end up invading us in the future for our resources anyways, so dont act all high and mighty. plus, since your government seems content to develop economic hegemony over its allies and decides not to listen to the member states of NATO or the UN, what is to make us believe you'd answer our call for military assistance? squat. also, although conflict with either seems fairly distant presently...it's my opinion and many others that you would not be able to take either russia OR china in an aerial or ground-based war. the only forseable victory for the states would be nuclear conflict, and everyone loses there. so yes, GW would still be a twat. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Mike_B As much as that's a great idea, don't forget who's in power. They're more likely to send Democrats and minorities to war. Give them less compitition in the next election |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Aristronica and gays, let's not forget the gays but the ironic thing is, most of the Bush voters all all gung-ho about war and would probably enlist first |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by XaNaX Name a country that the US has ever invaded for its natural resources. If that were the case we would be stealing Iraqi crude as fast as we could pump it. Instead we invade the country, spend billions doing it in order to remove a violent dictator and hopefully add a little more stability to the middle east. Like it or not, every country we have invaded since 1900 has been to defend it from some foreign agressor or some communist revolution, not to steal resources. And it has almost always been at the request of the rest of the world. And I have to disagree with you on us not being able to take China or Russia. The US would not beat them in a matter of days like Iraq but we have the most powerful, most advanced military there is. Neither Russia or China would want to test that. And again, our massive nuclear stockpile would prevent China or Russia from going there. |
what's with this thread? you guys couldnt hack it in the Political Debate and Discussion Forum?
actually i dont blame you, it was mostly flaming in there.
on a side note, i'm glad Bush is still in office. I support the conservative side, as my morals and values closely match those of many conservatives.
>JM<
NOTE:
"Kerry's telling college students Bush is going to bring back the draft (which, btw, a bill to do so was crushed in the US Senate 99-1, and obliterated in the US House 434-2) <-- rough figures.*
* and OMG, the 1 vote in the Senate was a DEMOCRATIC senator, and oh wow, the 2 votes in the House were from DEMOCRATIC representatives. Methinks it's hypocritical for their party to rant about Bush and the draft when it's their own party bringing up such bills."
Yan, you're right. That's one thing that is absolutely ludicrous.
Time to dust off those "bush or monkey" sites... Here's one to get you started:
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Yan NOTE: "Kerry's telling college students Bush is going to bring back the draft (which, btw, a bill to do so was crushed in the US Senate 99-1, and obliterated in the US House 434-2) <-- rough figures.* * and OMG, the 1 vote in the Senate was a DEMOCRATIC senator, and oh wow, the 2 votes in the House were from DEMOCRATIC representatives. Methinks it's hypocritical for their party to rant about Bush and the draft when it's their own party bringing up such bills." |
Anyone care to help me with a rebuttal to this statement:
| quote: |
| Oh **** you. Get your ******* facts straight. Kerry didn't flip-flop, you ******* moron. Read the congressional records before spewing rhetoric. On the Senate floor on October 9th, 2002, Kerry said: "As the President made clear earlier this week, �Approving this resolution does not mean that military action is imminent or unavoidable.� It means that America speaks with one voice. Let me be clear, the vote I will give to the President is for one reason and one reason only: To disarm Iraq of weapons of mass destruction, if we cannot accomplish that objective through new, tough weapons inspections in joint concert with our allies. �In giving the President this authority, I expect him to fulfill the commitments he has made to the American people in recent days--to work with the United Nations Security Council to adopt a new resolution setting out tough and immediate inspection requirements, and to act with our allies at our side if we have to disarm Saddam Hussein by force. If he fails to do so, I will be among the first to speak out. If we do wind up going to war with Iraq, it is imperative that we do so with others in the international community..." Golly gosh, he was against the war in 2002! Right after 9/11! He didn't flop-flop! EDUCATE YOUR ******* SELF. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Mike_B You're an Idiot. where not saying the Bush wants the Draft, were saying the way bush runs things, he wont have a choise. |
I'd rather not respect the views of Bush supporters, since they aren't respect-able.
To be honest, I have respect for a lot of conservative positions, but they happen to be the ones that Bush doesn't stand for, like: privacy rights, fiscal responsibility, personal responsibility, non-interventionism, and a narrow interpretation of the Constitution.
I can't even really see how Bush can rightly be called a conservative when he shamelessly abandons these core conservative principles. When I find out someone is a Bush supporter, I can only assume that they are ignorant about his actual views, or they are simply living in a land of nonsensical "faith-based" emotional "thinking." Neither of these qualities is respectable, so I don't really respect any Bush supporters. All the conservatives I respect abandoned Bush years ago and split between Kerry and Badnarik.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Yan A little late on the uptake, eh?  Got to it a few posts before you =P |
))
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.