US gives up on WMD search - TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- US gives up on WMD search
Pages (8): « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 »

Posted by Trancer-X on Jan-14-2005 05:50:

quote:
Originally posted by Sevas Stra
your post was the dumbest thing i've ever read so didn't bother to reply...What does your post prove that the 1 percent are wealthy? Yeah they are and they are also the smarter part of the country. that's a fact look over at the voter turn outs. NY times for example the most influantial news paper . Stick to your DC.

It's not my fault that you have reading comprehension inadequacies (among other things, as it would seem.)

Influential? Well, they certainly are megalithic. Are you saying that this is a good thing?

http://www.cjr.org/tools/owners/nyt.asp

Posted by Sevas Stra on Jan-14-2005 05:53:

OMFG ONE LETTER...CALL THE MARINES, I'M DOOMED...

Posted by Trancer-X on Jan-14-2005 05:53:

quote:
Originally posted by ResonantDrag
[audible exhale]

+1

Posted by Trancer-X on Jan-14-2005 05:59:

quote:
Originally posted by Sevas Stra
OMFG ONE LETTER...CALL THE MARINES, I'M DOOMED...

If you haven't heard by now, one letter can make all the difference in the English language.

Posted by ResonantDrag on Jan-14-2005 06:03:

quote:
Originally posted by Trancer-X
If you haven't heard by now, one letter can make all the difference in the English language.

i hear sentence structure and originality mean a lot in the 21st century as well.

maybe i should just stick to lurking

Posted by Sevas Stra on Jan-14-2005 06:12:

quote:
Originally posted by Trancer-X
If you haven't heard by now, one letter can make all the difference in the English language.

you got me good there lol

Posted by ResonantDrag on Jan-14-2005 06:13:

quote:
Originally posted by Sevas Stra
you got me good there lol

and he spent 15 minutes figuring that response

Posted by Trancer-X on Jan-14-2005 06:14:

quote:
Originally posted by ResonantDrag
i hear sentence structure and originality mean a lot in the 21st century as well.

maybe i should just stick to lurking

I agree with you 100%

edit: on the sentence structure, that is

Posted by ResonantDrag on Jan-14-2005 06:15:

quote:
Originally posted by Trancer-X
I agree with you 100%

do my posts suck that bad?

Posted by Sevas Stra on Jan-14-2005 06:15:

oh my you got me again, ROFL...:big yawn:

Posted by Trancer-X on Jan-14-2005 06:41:

quote:
Originally posted by ResonantDrag
do my posts suck that bad?

Check my edit. I typed it real quick and then realized that it looked derogatory and not what I intended, so I quickly edited it before the minute was up.

I've read some very good posts from you, so please don't feel like I was bashing you in any way!

Posted by Trancer-X on Jan-14-2005 06:45:

quote:
Originally posted by Sevas Stra
oh my you got me again, ROFL...:big yawn:

To boot, I was only typing with my left pinky finger!

Posted by Sevas Stra on Jan-14-2005 06:47:

lame...don't lose any sleep over this

Posted by Trancer-X on Jan-14-2005 06:55:

quote:
Originally posted by Sevas Stra
lame...don't lose any sleep over this

I've been fighting to stay awake while reading your drivel.

Posted by Sevas Stra on Jan-14-2005 07:17:

damn you're pathetic

Posted by Trancer-X on Jan-14-2005 07:27:

quote:
Originally posted by Sevas Stra
damn you're pathetic

By continually responding to your lamebrain posts, I would be proving you right on that last one.
So, ciao!

Posted by Sevas Stra on Jan-14-2005 07:37:

LOL your dinky brain has been "replying" for hours, go fist yourself

Posted by razmataz on Jan-14-2005 10:03:

Ok, thanks for the hijack/mandatory insults on grammar structure.

Back to the administration's blatant lies about WMDs. So where the hell are the Bush dopes on this forum? Atleast come up and admit that you were gullible enough to believe in that blatant horseshit. And we can take it from there.

Posted by Sevas Stra on Jan-14-2005 16:55:

Last time i check Bush didn't compile a report about the WMDs that Kerry and Tony Blair both supported

Posted by MisterOpus1 on Jan-14-2005 17:12:

quote:
Originally posted by Sevas Stra
Last time i check Bush didn't compile a report about the WMDs that Kerry and Tony Blair both supported

Kerry supported the intelligence that he did not know was faulty and cherry-picked at that time.

Blair has got his own problems propping up his case for war with his own gov't and citizens.

Posted by Sevas Stra on Jan-14-2005 17:22:

Oh yeah and Bush ofcourse, as i said, wrote the report himself and knew it to be true while Kerry is just a innocent Navy fag...right your point is very plausible.

Posted by ResonantDrag on Jan-14-2005 17:29:

quote:
Originally posted by Trancer-X
Check my edit. I typed it real quick and then realized that it looked derogatory and not what I intended, so I quickly edited it before the minute was up.

I've read some very good posts from you, so please don't feel like I was bashing you in any way!

lol.. sorry, i was in a bit of a giggle mood last night. i knew the context, no offense was taken even before the edit.

back to the content...

tony blair is being held accountable for his play in this scam. any thoughts on who the new british PM will be?

Posted by Sevas Stra on Jan-14-2005 17:36:

You missed the point here...Iraq did indeed have chemical and biological weapons/agents, they supposedly don't/didn't have the capability of just launching them from there to here. The part where they gassed the Kurds with gasses such as Sarin (if you know what that is) was true, what wasn't was the panic that Iraq could attack American soil at any given time. However it's not nessicary to launch missiles in order to get it from one part of the world to another. They could always do their usualy chickenshit car bombs and such.

Posted by Trancer-X on Jan-14-2005 17:38:

quote:
Originally posted by Sevas Stra
Oh yeah and Bush ofcourse, as i said, wrote the report himself and knew it to be true while Kerry is just a innocent Navy fag...right your point is very plausible.

Obviously, you do a lot more talking than reading. There's been plenty of posts made regarding Rumsfeld's scramble to find enough evidence (whether faulty or not) to go to war in Iraq immediately after 9/11.

The Neo-cons had been planning it years before, but they needed a smoking gun in order to persuade the highly impressionable public to go to war in Iraq.

Noone likes a "know it all" that doesn't know shit. Read more and post less, that's my suggestion - at least until you can get your facts straight.

Posted by ResonantDrag on Jan-14-2005 17:42:

quote:
Originally posted by Sevas Stra
You missed the point here...Iraq did indeed have chemical and biological weapons/agents, they supposedly don't/didn't have the capability of just launching them from there to here. The part where they gassed the Kurds with gasses such as Sarin (if you know what that is) was true, what wasn't was the panic that Iraq could attack American soil at any given time. However it's not nessicary to launch missiles in order to get it from one part of the world to another. They could always do their usualy chickenshit car bombs and such.

are you trying to clarify your point?

Pages (8): « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 »