Soo i saw batman.... - TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- USA - New York
-- Soo i saw batman....
Pages (4): « 1 2 3 [4]

Posted by Miss Bliss on Oct-20-2005 22:48:

quote:
Originally posted by trunks1022
because i didn't criticize keaton doofus.

READ WHAT I HAVE TO SAY FIRST, CLEARLY BEFORE RESPONDING TO ME, ASS.

where'm i criticizing? douche.

go suck on armin's and michael keaton's ****

/endrant

going back to work...

Sal gets grumpier as his birthday approaches and he gets older

Posted by phoenixBEBE on Oct-21-2005 01:33:

quote:
Originally posted by Highmay
the original batman is a good movie...it's just that batman begins is far more superior...

i totally agree...the first batman and batman begins were good for different reasons...the first batman was really good and darkly comical but the sequels just got a bit too cheesy and overdone imo...the 2nd more reflective of Batman as the Dark Knight...i applaud both Burton AND Nolan for their visions... but Batman Begins gets my vote, i just prefer it...Christian Bale was excellent in his portrayal of the Dark Knight, and i thought the villian(s) was more heinous in this one. You have to admit, Scarecrow was madd creepy. im no movie critic but this is just what i thought.

Posted by fr0st on Oct-21-2005 01:59:

Christian Bale is also the first batman ti actually be 6'2"....

Posted by Shamez214 on Oct-21-2005 02:33:

quote:
Originally posted by DOOMBOT
I, including millions of others thought otherwise.

http://movieweb.com/movies/box_office/alltime.php
#33

I hate when people bring up sales as a way of determining how good a movie is. Totally baseless argument, in my eyes.

Posted by DJ_Lord on Oct-21-2005 02:37:

whos christian bale?

Posted by Shamez214 on Oct-21-2005 02:39:

Posted by DOOMBOT on Oct-21-2005 04:04:

quote:
Originally posted by Shamez214
I hate when people bring up sales as a way of determining how good a movie is. Totally baseless argument, in my eyes.

I didnt bring it up to show that it was a good movie. I brought it up to show a lot of people went to see it. A lot more then usual. Showing, people thoroughly enjoyed it.

Posted by DOOMBOT on Oct-21-2005 04:06:

quote:
Originally posted by trunks1022
michael keaton was kinda goofy in that role. well maybe in the role of bruce wayne

You quoted me here in reference to my remark to Highmay about how I didnt understand why he may have thought Batman in the first one wasnt seen as a dark character. You responded with the above quote. To me, this means you were making the comment in defense to Highmay by saying, no he didnt because Bruce Wayne was too goofy. Wow, I could have been wrong kid, why dont you help me understand your thought process. Wait, nevermind... I think Ill pass on that one.

Posted by trunks1022 on Oct-21-2005 04:08:

4. Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace (1999) $922,379,000

23. Star Wars: Episode II - Attack of the Clones (2002) $648,200,000

does that mean everyone thoroughly enjoyed watching these two movies?

Posted by DOOMBOT on Oct-21-2005 04:10:

quote:
Originally posted by trunks1022
4. Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace (1999) $922,379,000

23. Star Wars: Episode II - Attack of the Clones (2002) $648,200,000

does that mean everyone thoroughly enjoyed watching these two movies?

I would imagine so. 23 out of the thousands of movies to have ever been released is pretty damn good, dont ya think? Again, I am not understanding how you think. It makes no sense to me.

Posted by trunks1022 on Oct-21-2005 04:11:

quote:
Originally posted by DOOMBOT
I would imagine so. 23 out of the thousands of movies to have ever been releasedl, dont ya think? Again, I am not understanding how you think. It makes no sense to me.

i don't understand how you think either. many critics and fans alike panned it. just because they were some of the highest grossing movies of all time doesn't mean that everyone enjoyed it. stop making generalized statements.

Posted by DOOMBOT on Oct-21-2005 04:12:

quote:
Originally posted by trunks1022
i don't understand how you think either. many critics and fans alike panned it. just because they were some of the highest grossing movies of all time doesn't mean that everyone enjoyed it. stop making generalized statements.

You base your thoughts on a few critics? Give me a break kid.

Posted by trunks1022 on Oct-21-2005 04:14:

ok. from personal experience, i saw both and didn't enjoy them. happy now? i believe you're the young'un

Posted by DOOMBOT on Oct-21-2005 04:19:

quote:
Originally posted by trunks1022
ok. from personal experience, i saw both and didn't enjoy them. happy now? i believe you're the young'un

Haha, you are too funny. Do you have a short metal rod attached to the seat cushion of your chair?

Posted by trunks1022 on Oct-21-2005 04:19:

quote:
Originally posted by DOOMBOT
Haha, you are too funny. Do you have a short metal rod attached to the seat cushion of your chair?

yeah i use it to whack people over the head. any other innuendos you can come up with?

Posted by DOOMBOT on Oct-21-2005 04:22:

quote:
Originally posted by trunks1022
yeah i use it to whack people over the head. any other innuendos you can come up with?

Nah man. Just tryin to figured out what your deal is. Either you have a lot of personal issues you have to deal with and take it out on the internet or you just like to argue with everying I say for some reason. But hey, whatever makes you happy!

Posted by trunks1022 on Oct-21-2005 04:24:

quote:
Originally posted by DOOMBOT
Nah man. Just tryin to figured out what your deal is. Either you have a lot of personal issues you have to deal with and take it out on the internet or you just like to argue with everying I say for some reason. But hey, whatever makes you happy!

you, like most people on the board, do not know me well. i kinda like it that way. sorry.

to summarize

christian bale's batman > michael keaton's batman. IN MY OPINION.

Posted by DOOMBOT on Oct-21-2005 04:25:

Okay. But I dont come here to get down on a personal level with everyone. That is actually impossible to do with the thousands of members this forum has. So, are you a dick to the thousands here for the reasons you just stated or just me?

Posted by Miss Bliss on Oct-21-2005 04:26:

quote:
Originally posted by trunks1022
yeah i use it to whack people over the head. any other innuendos you can come up with?

(have to interject to say that I LOL'D @ this, comeback of the year )

Love to you all!! I'm going to the Loire to see some chateaux!! I could really go for some chocolate cereal too. Life ain't so bad.

Posted by Miss Bliss on Oct-21-2005 04:27:

P.S. Christian Bale =
Val Kilmer's Batman was (hot) though.

Posted by trunks1022 on Oct-21-2005 04:30:

quote:
Originally posted by DOOMBOT
Okay. But I dont come here to get down on a personal level with everyone. That is actually impossible to do with the thousands of members this forum has. So, are you a dick to the thousands here for the reasons you just stated or just me?

only to those that seem to put down others for having their own opinions. don't take it personally when ppl don't agree with you.

Posted by DOOMBOT on Oct-21-2005 04:35:

quote:
Originally posted by trunks1022
only to those that seem to put down others for having their own opinions. don't take it personally when ppl don't agree with you.

I dont but dont take it personally if I ask why you have the thoughts you do. Just adds to discussion.

Posted by trunks1022 on Oct-21-2005 04:38:

quote:
Originally posted by DOOMBOT
I dont but dont take it personally if I ask why you have the thoughts you do. Just adds to discussion.

and my polite response is, it's really no one's business what my thoughts are.

bcf > all is pretty important tho

Posted by DOOMBOT on Oct-21-2005 04:39:

Is he Bruce Wayne in the next one or have they grabbed a new actor? I have heard both.

Posted by trunks1022 on Oct-21-2005 04:41:

quote:
Originally posted by DOOMBOT
Is he Bruce Wayne in the next one or have they grabbed a new actor? I have heard both.

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000288/

Pages (4): « 1 2 3 [4]