TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Canada - Toronto & Southern Ont.
-- Future PM of Canada
Pages (4): « 1 2 3 [4]


Posted by Moral Hazard on Nov-29-2005 18:35:

^^^^ toward stereo ads


Posted by Yohan on Nov-29-2005 18:39:

They're biased towards the Sunshine Girls.

But then, so are we.


Posted by Fir3start3r on Nov-30-2005 01:27:

quote:
Originally posted by b4k-oz
Well I disagree...I happen to think our education system is quite good and I have no regrets. Furthermore, I think it's quite valuable in building character...

I don't have anything against people who take that road, that's just my personal opinion.
I can think of much better things that will build character other than incurring a huge, stressful debt however...

quote:

such as the [b]Michael Ignatieff's[/r b] of today.
The only time it faulters is when a person develops a condescending tone and thinks themselves too highly or tries to impose their belief to be above others. However, that trait can also be an individuals own insecurity or ignorance...and it often leads to suggestive retorts or comments "aside from....I haven't seen anyone...(meaning "you"--->anyone)...put forth a reasonably intelligent argument..." Ahahahahaa to think that a person believes themselves to be the judge of what is intelligent is quite amusing to read.

It's quite easy to understand; I didn't like Trudeau.
That doesn't mean my one opinion reflects my whole persona however unless one believes judging books by their cover...

quote:

But then that's what this site is about...it's about amusement...through music, expression and laughter.

This site is hardly the place for a real political debate

Agreed.
But at least some people give actual support for their arguements when stating an opinion.
It's one thing to spout. It's quite another to try and have a debate over the Internet. As you mentioned; think before hitting that reply button! I can agree with that for sure...

I think it obvious we can agree to disagree at this point.
Past the beer...


Posted by DigiNut on Nov-30-2005 02:10:

quote:
Originally posted by MarkT
I agree with the groupthink that exists...but don't you get the impression that some people here act as if there IS a media conspiracy?

I further feel that some people are implying that media bias is a signicant explanation (excuse) for Harper's inability to lead the Conservatives to power.

Groupthink can be a problem...but then it's the opposition's job to combat that groupthink. More people here seem to be content in crying "media bias" than addressing Harper's shortcomings as party leader.

The double standards are funny. There are those who claim that Liberal supporters are such only because they dislike Harper...yet there are Conservative supporters who don't mention Harper at all in their discussions, they just negatively react to Martin. Isn't this why the Conservatives are failing to win over the people? Because they're spending too much time crying "scandal" and not enough time telling us why we should vote Conservative? Don't tell me it's because the Liberals are crooks...I know what happened. Tell me why I should want Stephen Harper or Jack Layton as PM.

I wish there WAS a media conspiracy, it would be an easier problem to fix than the groupthink and unconscious bias.

To the extent that people think the media is responsible for the election results - it's obviously not true, if the media had a significant effect on election results then Kerry would have been elected in the U.S. However, the media *did* make Mulroney into a monster, which I think has stuck in the mind of Canadians for many years and is partially, although not completely responsible for the knee-jerk reaction that Canadians have to the image of Conservative leadership.

Anyway, I don't think mass media really has an "opposition", but if it does, it's Fox News and Rush Limbaugh, and look at the flak they get.


Posted by crazyadas on Dec-01-2005 02:32:

I hope Belinda Stronach ends up being PM someday she has the qualities of a good leader. Intelligent, nice person, well then again she used to be my boss!


Posted by Yohan on Dec-01-2005 02:48:

quote:
Originally posted by crazyadas
I hope Belinda Stronach ends up being PM someday she has the qualities of a good leader. Intelligent, nice person, well then again she used to be my boss!


She also likes to stick blades into people's back.

Not quite the type of quality I look for in a PM


Posted by MarkT on Dec-01-2005 20:55:

quote:
Originally posted by DigiNut
...
Anyway, I don't think mass media really has an "opposition", but if it does, it's Fox News and Rush Limbaugh, and look at the flak they get.


FOX news rocks...who needs sitcoms and reality TV when you've got Fox news to laugh at...scary, lol.


Posted by DigiNut on Dec-01-2005 23:41:

quote:
Originally posted by MarkT
FOX news rocks...who needs sitcoms and reality TV when you've got Fox news to laugh at...scary, lol.

Fox News is not any more biased than ABC, NBC, or CBS.

This argument is so tiring. I'm not claiming that Fox News isn't biased, just that you have to be practicing willful blindness not to see the opposite bias on other networks. And you know, I really don't have a problem with bias - it only becomes a problem to me when it's attempted to be passed off as hard objective news.

It seems as though liberals (Canadians especially) place their standard for objectivity quite far left of centre, so Fox News to them looks "extreme" while the CBC looks "just right" or maybe "a tiny bit biased".

Why do you think conservative talk show hosts like Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh get over 20 million listeners a week, while virtually every single liberal talk show host has met with abysmal failure? It's because people who aren't left of centre already KNOW the liberal spin, they get it rammed down their throat every day. Fox News is successful because it puts on a conservative spin.

Anyway, I think the recent portrayal of Harper as kicking off his campaign by diving straight into the gay marriage issue is clear evidence of the media bias in Canada.


Posted by djeso on Dec-02-2005 00:05:

quote:
Originally posted by MarkT


you know there is a political section in this forum, did you know that, or do you need to go to university to figure that out ??


Posted by MarkT on Mar-31-2006 05:45:

a welcome addition to the leadership race, IMHO

from today's Toronto Star:

quote:
Ignatieff all but declares leadership bid
Mar. 30, 2006. 06:59 PM
CANADIAN PRESS


OTTAWA � Michael Ignatieff all but declared his candidacy for the federal Liberal leadership Thursday, staking his claim as the natural heir to party icon Pierre Trudeau.

The acclaimed scholar, author and one-time journalist modestly declaimed any right to be compared to Trudeau, the late philosopher king of Canadian politics.

But, in a speech to an overflow crowd of about 250 students at the University of Ottawa, the cerebral, rookie Toronto MP presented himself as the thinking-person's candidate, an intellectual with strongly held beliefs on human rights, national unity and the merits of a strong central government.

Ignatieff faced a small protest over his past musings on the use of torture and his support for the American-led invasion of Iraq.

Four protesters stood silently throughout the speech, dressed in orange jumpsuits with black hoods draped over their heads in the manner of prisoners allegedly abused by American soldiers.

But his 30-minute discourse and thoughtful replies to subsequent questions were generally warmly received. One mature student, despite disagreeing with Ignatieff's stance on Iraq, gushed that the putative candidate is "molded in the tradition of Pierre Trudeau."

"I'm always flattered when those comparisons are made," Ignatieff responded.

"But let's be very clear. There was one Pierre Trudeau and there will not be another."

Ignatieff is expected late next week to formally join the race to succeed Paul Martin, who resigned after losing the Jan. 23 election. Martin's replacement will be chosen Dec. 2-3, but Thursday's speech was a campaign launch in all but name.

"I don't think you'll have to wait long," Ignatieff told reporters who pressed him to announce his intentions. "I'm not in a Hamlet-like state of indecision."

Ignatieff used the speech to lay out his vision for the country. He also attempted to rebut the criticisms that have dogged him since he returned to Canada last fall after almost 30 years out of the country.

He said he's never been out of touch with his Canadian roots, returning frequently to teach, give lectures and make documentaries. He suggested his time spent at Harvard, in Britain and as a war correspondent have given him a more rounded perspective on Canada.

"Sometimes you only see your country clearly from far away."

On Iraq, Ignatieff said his support for the American invasion was based on his personal belief that former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein was "genocidal tyrant" responsible for the mass murder of Kurds and Shia Muslims.

As a Harvard professor, he said he had the luxury of voicing his personal views without worrying about public opinion or the potential impact on national unity of involving Canadian troops in a war that was particularly unpopular in Quebec.

"Now that I'm an elected politician I'm deeply aware of those responsibilities," he told reporters, adding that public opinion would be "a significant factor" in any future decisions on deployment of the military.

Ignatieff also unequivocally condemned the use of torture � even the mildest forms of coercive interrogation � to extract information from suspected terrorists.

One student was unconvinced, citing passages from one of Ignatieff's books to suggest he once condoned tactics like sleep deprivation and hoods.

In one of a series of interviews with the national media following Thursday's speech, Ignatieff shrugged off a suggestion that he is too cerebral to survive in the rough and tumble political arena.

"It never pays to underestimate the intelligence of the Canadian voter," he told The Canadian Press. "Canadians, I think, want complexity, they want detail."

During his first campaign last December and January, Ignatieff said he found "when you condescend to Canadians, when you give them sound bites and slogans, you get pushed off the door step."

Ignatieff also tackled the criticism that it's presumptuous for someone who has been an MP for all of two months to think he could lead a national party and eventually the country.

"The only honest answer here is that there have been men and women who trained all their lives to be prime minister and turned out to be really bad at it," he said.

"And there have been people who didn't train very long who turned out to be good at it."

In his speech, Ignatieff laid out his vision for Canada, the core of which revolves around ensuring the country remains united through the practice of what he dubbed "the federalism of recognition and respect."

He said the federal government must respect provincial jurisdictions and recognize that not all provinces are equal but not the same. He endorsed giving Quebec a greater voice on the international stage to protect its unique language and culture.


Posted by Jayx1 on Mar-31-2006 13:43:

if this guy becomes liberal leader, i will laugh out loud everytime i hear an anti american remark from a liberal.


Posted by Abercrombie on Mar-31-2006 16:39:

Did someone say Belinda? 'just got back from vacation... did I miss anything good here?

AJ


Posted by MarkT on Dec-10-2008 18:42:

a timely bump of a 3+ yr old thread , I suppose


Posted by Jayx1 on Dec-10-2008 22:10:

quote:
Originally posted by MarkT
a timely bump of a 3+ yr old thread , I suppose


dont count your chickens just yet


Posted by DigiNut on Dec-10-2008 23:45:

Iggy still has the same problems he had last campaign. I really hope that the Liberals can find someone better. Yeah, he's a better choice than Rae or Dion, but he's just not enough of a realist to pose serious competition at a time like this.


Posted by zoogla on Dec-11-2008 00:39:

i thought this thread was about me


Posted by dEsidEL on Dec-11-2008 04:27:



lol what ever happened to ultra-righty ShadoWolf


Posted by Moral Hazard on Dec-11-2008 12:54:

quote:
Originally posted by dEsidEL


lol what ever happened to ultra-righty ShadoWolf



he only shows up for elections.


Posted by djeso on Dec-11-2008 14:57:

quote:
Originally posted by b4k-oz
BTW...Dear Fir3start3r
You have officially surprised me. I would have never thought you were one to take cheap shots. One must always be careful when they make low blows...bc you lose face when your true flag colours show up.


so if someone doesn't not agree it means they gotta grow up ..... I think that's quite loony lol


Posted by zoogla on Dec-11-2008 15:00:

quote:
Originally posted by crazyadas
I hope Belinda Stronach ends up being PM someday she has the qualities of a good leader. Intelligent, nice person, well then again she used to be my boss!

+1 but not because she's intelligent (which she isn't)


Posted by DigiNut on Dec-11-2008 23:05:

It's one thing to bump a 3-year-old thread... it's quite another to reply to posts made 3 years ago. Could you folks please pay attention to the dates?

Half of those people don't even visit/post anymore.


Posted by Spam on Dec-12-2008 01:33:

If Ignatieff was PM, we'd be in Iraq.

Sometimes I miss Chretien, he was just like Harper... only funnier, and more arrogant and smug.


Posted by Silky Johnson on Dec-12-2008 12:58:

quote:
Originally posted by b4k-oz
it's Pat.




Posted by Skipper on Dec-12-2008 14:15:

Re: Future PM of Canada

quote:
Originally posted by MarkT
Here's someone who's ...not a businessman.


Yeah, perfect leader for this economy. Nice post 3 years ago but not today


Pages (4): « 1 2 3 [4]

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.