TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- A new digusting act
Pages (4): « 1 2 3 [4]
| quote: |
| Originally posted by InterMilan31 Time for the UK and the rest of Europe to stop treating these Muslims with gentle hands. Im sick of that shit they dont obey the rules, they protest on anything that goes against allah. They scream racism and un-fairness. Im tired of this great job for stopping these pigs |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by George Smiley No Libya was a socialist pan-Arab nationalist state. The group that carried out the Lockerbie bombing were a socialist group. Nothing to do with Islam whatsoever. None of them were against Britain. Try again... They do mix! I live in an area full of Muslims and white people. Obviously your gonna get some that don't wanna blend in, but I'm not aure how you work out this is the norm? Maybe you should stop listening to what that idiot Griffin tells you? Yet there was no Islamist threat before Iraq, so tell me how you can prove your point? There's a fine line between freedom of speech and promoting violence. For example, many socialists/anarchists believe in the overthrowing of the state by force - would you have them shipped off to Egypt? As for Hamza, there was direct evidence (imo) that he had had a hand (well it would only be one hand!!) in the deaths of people abroad. That makes him a criminal, not his beliefs. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by George Smiley Yes well your best guess is an attempt to dodge the blindingly obvious |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by George Smiley Oh well if a bunch of TAs never refuted your point it must be true! |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by trancaholic Great argument again Smiley. |
| quote: |
| For the sake of further discussion in this forum, it should be. Seeing as you apparently see testing argument in favor of /opposition to a given proposal irrelevant here, I guess that we have quite different reasons for visiting this forum. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Dj O'Callaghan You live in let me guess Bradford, Leeds, Luton? It might work in certain areas. I don't have a problem with ethnic minorities coming over here, but please mix and intergrate in with the culture. In Northampton it hasn't happened well at all Whites & Blacks do not get on well with Muslims at all, it takes little things to spark things off. |
| quote: |
| At some parents evenings at schools here they have a choice of having an Urdo speaker! If they want to be part of this country surely they can speak English? I think that defys the object living in another country the least you can do is speak the language! If that offends anyone they can go eat shit as far I'm concerned. |
| quote: |
| Now here is another thing which annoys most people, you cannot do a single thing without being accused of being Racist or Xenophobic off some Liberal twat. The Human rights laws are stupid it's Political correctness gone mad. |
| quote: |
| Well George there not attacks on Britain directly but there attacks on spots which are popular with Western tourists and British people died, that to me is an attack on British people but on foreign soil. |
| quote: |
| I would remove them by force due to the fact they abuse freedom of speech by preaching hate. If someone stirs up any racial violence they should be locked up for a long time if their British born, deported if their foreign it's simple. |
| quote: |
| Socialists are a simple one I'd ship them all off to South Pole but that won't happen if their families intervined, the irony I find in the majority of the people who are socialists they grew up playing polo with Rupert and Geraldine. Anarchists the same as socialists, go to University find the whole ideology of it all intresting then think it's fun to smash up the odd Maccy D's from time to time (Good idea on cutting down on Obesity problem but taking it a bit too far I think). By the way you should stop hanging around with George Galloway |
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4789593.stm
Thank Allah!!!
I fly to Berlin in a few weeks and I'll be fucked if I'm spending �20 on a thimble full of coke and one biscuit and a bit of cheese on the Ryan Air plane!!!
I'm gettin stocked up on plenty of normal priced food and eat it in the face of somebody who didn't think that far ahead!!!
Actually, the more I think of it, the more it becomes obvious that this "threat" was created by a cartell of budget airlines wanting to force passengers to pay extortionate prices for the little scraps of food they serve aboard! They must have been raking it in this week!!
I have been reading very carefully through all the Sunday newspapers to try and analyse the truth from all the scores of pages claiming to detail the so-called bomb plot. Unlike the great herd of so-called security experts doing the media analysis, I have the advantage of having had the very highest security clearances myself, having done a huge amount of professional intelligence analysis, and having been inside the spin machine.
So this, I believe, is the true story.
None of the alleged terrorists had made a bomb. None had bought a plane ticket. Many did not even have passports, which given the efficiency of the UK Passport Agency would mean they couldn't be a plane bomber for quite some time.
In the absence of bombs and airline tickets, and in many cases passports, it could be pretty difficult to convince a jury beyond reasonable doubt that individuals intended to go through with suicide bombings, whatever rash stuff they may have bragged in internet chat rooms.
What is more, many of those arrested had been under surveillance for over a year - like thousands of other British Muslims. And not just Muslims. Like me. Nothing from that surveillance had indicated the need for early arrests.
Then an interrogation in Pakistan revealed the details of this amazing plot to blow up multiple planes - which, rather extraordinarily, had not turned up in a year of surveillance. Of course, the interrogators of the Pakistani dictator have their ways of making people sing like canaries. As I witnessed in Uzbekistan, you can get the most extraordinary information this way. Trouble is it always tends to give the interrogators all they might want, and more, in a desperate effort to stop or avert torture. What it doesn't give is the truth.
The gentleman being "interrogated" had fled the UK after being wanted for questioning over the murder of his uncle some years ago. That might be felt to cast some doubt on his reliability. It might also be felt that factors other than political ones might be at play within these relationships. Much is also being made of large transfers of money outside the formal economy. Not in fact too unusual in the British Muslim community, but if this activity is criminal, there are many possibilities that have nothing to do with terrorism.
We then have the extraordinary question of Bush and Blair discussing the possible arrests over the weekend. Why? I think the answer to that is plain. Both in desperate domestic political trouble, they longed for "Another 9/11". The intelligence from Pakistan, however dodgy, gave them a new 9/11 they could sell to the media. The media has bought, wholesale, all the rubbish they have been shovelled.
We then have the appalling political propaganda of John Reid, Home Secretary, making a speech warning us all of the dreadful evil threatening us and complaining that "Some people don't get" the need to abandon all our traditional liberties. He then went on, according to his own propaganda machine, to stay up all night and minutely direct the arrests. There could be no clearer evidence that our Police are now just a political tool. Like all the best nasty regimes, the knock on the door came in the middle of the night, at 2.30am. Those arrested included a mother with a six week old baby.
For those who don't know, it is worth introducing Reid. A hardened Stalinist with a long term reputation for personal violence, at Stirling Univeristy he was the Communist Party's "Enforcer", (in days when the Communist Party ran Stirling University Students' Union, which it should not be forgotten was a business with a very substantial cash turnover). Reid was sent to beat up those who deviated from the Party line.
We will now never know if any of those arrested would have gone on to make a bomb or buy a plane ticket. Most of them do not fit the "Loner" profile you would expect - a tiny percentage of suicide bombers have happy marriages and young children. As they were all under surveillance, and certainly would have been on airport watch lists, there could have been little danger in letting them proceed closer to maturity - that is certainly what we would have done with the IRA.
In all of this, the one thing of which I am certain is that the timing is deeply political. This is more propaganda than plot. Of the over one thousand British Muslims arrested under anti-terrorist legislation, only twelve per cent are ever charged with anything. That is simply harrassment of Muslims on an appalling scale. Of those charged, 80% are acquitted. Most of the very few - just over two per cent of arrests - who are convicted, are not convicted of anything to do terrorism, but of some minor offence the Police happened upon while trawling through the wreck of the lives they had shattered.
Be sceptical. Be very, very sceptical.
http://www.craigmurray.co.uk/archiv...k_terror_p.html
So who is Criag Murray?
http://www.craigmurray.co.uk/craig_murray.html
| quote: |
| Originally posted by George Smiley And what is your solution to the war on terror? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by sasslife Reduce rights for aliens within western countries. Use collective punishment- Preach or act in a way which incites violence against the general public and you and your family are out. If the people are then considered stateless than indeffinate setences These animals are guests in western countries. This will never cease to be the case until their communities embrace OUR way of life. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by George Smiley It's views like yours that is exactly the reason why some Muslims feel alienated and "keep themselves to themselves". An I thought you were Austrailian? So your one of the foreigners you talk about reducing civil liberties for too |
One more thing.
I am a steryotypical terrorist (all accept the accent and religious beliefs of course)
My grandad is a sheik in tanzania and i was born to an iranian mum.
Im 25, always look pissed off and always pay for things with cash.
If i were stopped at an airport for an additional check because of my appearance and behaviour i would be re-assured that the resources on hand are being used for in the most efficent manor thus the best outcome.
If you are allocated 10,000 hours of security for an airport what is the F8cking point of search a 25 year old women with three kids. Every search that is conducted in the name of political correctness is one less that can be used on someone of interest. Resources are finite.
I'd be more reassured if we spent the money on more important things like health care or fighting violent crime, not piss it up the wall on extra policing for 'Pakis'
| quote: |
| Originally posted by George Smiley Leeds. And in your example, is this always the fault of the Muslims (do you know that they are for a fact Muslim, and not Hindu or Sikh?) I agree they should learn English. But speaking a different language does not make you a terrorist sympathiser! Can you be more specific about which laws you are talking about? Britain was not attacked and that is what I asked. Bali was not bombed to kill British people, it was bombed to kill westerners. I am asking you why Britain specifically was not targetted before Iraq, and nobody wants to answer it because it flies in the face of their views about evil Muslims... If it can be proved that they are inciting and encouraging violence then yes, they should be deported (if foreign) or sent to jail (if British). However, it's a fine line and open to abuse by the authorities. For example, the anti-terrorist laws have mainly been used against anti-capitalist protests. Well I would describe myself as a social democrat which is not what you describe above. I agree with your comments about Anarchists and Marxists (which I assume you incorrectly refer to as Socialists, as that is the broad umbrella term for left wing ideologies) And I've said it before and I'll say it again, Galloway is a twat!!! |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by George Smiley Leeds. And in your example, is this always the fault of the Muslims (do you know that they are for a fact Muslim, and not Hindu or Sikh?) I agree they should learn English. But speaking a different language does not make you a terrorist sympathiser! Can you be more specific about which laws you are talking about? Britain was not attacked and that is what I asked. Bali was not bombed to kill British people, it was bombed to kill westerners. I am asking you why Britain specifically was not targetted before Iraq, and nobody wants to answer it because it flies in the face of their views about evil Muslims... If it can be proved that they are inciting and encouraging violence then yes, they should be deported (if foreign) or sent to jail (if British). However, it's a fine line and open to abuse by the authorities. For example, the anti-terrorist laws have mainly been used against anti-capitalist protests. Well I would describe myself as a social democrat which is not what you describe above. I agree with your comments about Anarchists and Marxists (which I assume you incorrectly refer to as Socialists, as that is the broad umbrella term for left wing ideologies) And I've said it before and I'll say it again, Galloway is a twat!!! |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Dj O'Callaghan On the first point we are in an agreement, they need to learn the language and yes if they don't speak English their not terrorism supporters. The immigration system the UK however is a fucking mess. |
| quote: |
| No laws just I feel the civil rights in this country take the piss, yes it's a democracy but they go over the top sometimes. |
| quote: |
| I agree with the new terror laws when you can lock people up for a while pending questioning. But I don't need that fucking short haired dyke on question time ranting on about civil rights. |
| quote: |
| Yes your asking for an example of an attack on British soil I gave you some answers |
| quote: |
| maybe you disagree with the whole Iraq thing I do too, but I will certainly support people serving over there some of them being my mates in fact. |
| quote: |
| I don't know what you voted for in the last election I think you probably went for Labour or Lib Dem? But if you went for Labour they were the ones who decided to join the USA invading Iraq, a guilty conscience maybe? |
| quote: |
| For the record I don't mind Muslims, their not evil people but they need to do a hell of a lot more to sort out the Muslim community, because I think they sit on their arse and do fuck all about it, they sit in these mosques maybe they should know if someones going a bit off the rails? |
| quote: |
| Anyone who is anti captialist is the same to me to be honest, I stand against it. What I stand for is anyone who works hard for their family and anyone who aspires to something and follows their dreams. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Dj O'Callaghan The immigration system the UK however is a fucking mess. Anyone who is anti captialist is the same to me to be honest, I stand against it. What I stand for is anyone who works hard for their family and anyone who aspires to something and follows their dreams. |

| quote: |
| Originally posted by George Smiley I can see huge contradictions in your opening and finishing comments there... You don't want immigration, yet all the evidence suggests that Britains economic success compared to the other EU economies is because of immigration and the prospect of half a million entering from Romania/Bulgaria next year can only make our economy better. Yet the immigration system is a "fucking mess"? ![]() Also out of the 450,000 immigrants from the EU states, only 700 are on the dole (0.16%) so what does that tell you about "anyone who works hard"? Don't you think you need to refine your views on immigration so they are more in line with your views on capitalism??? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Dj O'Callaghan It's a mess we do not have the facilities to support the influx of immigrants coming into this country, where are their kids going to go school? which doctors and dentists will they be attending? The government need to get the quota's right. |
| quote: |
| I agree with what you say about them filling up employment gaps, and their hard workers too. IMO a lot of British people are lazy I think you should only be able to receive the dole for a year, plus I the benefits system needs to be looked at properly but that's another story. |
)| quote: |
| I'm a tory |
) but you also claim to be Irish!!! Why the **** would anyone in Ireland support the Tories after what they did to the country?!?!| quote: |
| I think we should stick to our guns on foreign policy, if we changed it too suddenely it would seem soft and the fanatics will feel like they've won. |
| quote: |
| We cannot change what's happened in Iraq unfortunatly weather you supported it or not but I feel the coalition governments who invaded should be obliged to rebuild the country, even though it will not be a stable region for decades. |
| quote: |
| I would of prefered us to of sent military advisors and intelligence operatives into Northwestern Pakistan and Saudi Arabia as I don't think both countries have the resources to deal with the terrorist infrastuctures based in their country, plus add to that I think their security forces are corrupt. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by George Smiley Well off the top of my head I know the Poles brought over 2,000 dentists with them (or it may have been doctors) and how many times do you hear people moaning cos they want an English doctor not a foreigner? Seems to me like there are plenty of doctors/dentists coming in THANKS to immigration Well then you should direct your criticisms towards the British people not immigrants who come over here to WORK (otherwise they would go to the more socialist political systems such as Scandanavia) (and you are only allowed to collect dole for 6 months! ) Wow! I'm not only shocked that you feel comfortable admitting that ( ) but you also claim to be Irish!!! Why the **** would anyone in Ireland support the Tories after what they did to the country?!?!Oh well let's just ignore what the people want and do what Bush wants us to do? I suppose you're against Brussels "dictating" how Britain acts? Yes unfortunately Iraq is fucked and I can't see any solutions to make it better. I don't think pulling out will make much difference either way. The problem with Pakistan is that the ISI worked extremely closely with the Islamists during the Afghan war and therefore forged (and maintained) extremely good relations with them. As for Saudi Arabia, there are "two" governments. "Our" side and ally which are the Crown Princes and then there is the "enemy" side which is the religious leaders who support al-Qaida whole heartedly. From the outside we are told to view Saudi Arabia as the Crown Prince (and hence our "allies") but domestically the religious leadership has all the influence |
. We seriously need to send in military advisers and Intelligence operatives into these regions. I hate the old ally stuff, their basicially allies who do not have a clue to run their own country. Pakistan for an example I wonder how corrupt the police there are, and It wouldn't suprise me if a Taleban fighter is better armed then the local security forces.
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.