The Worse computer applications ever for music.

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Production Studio
-- The Worse computer applications ever for music.
Pages (5): « 1 2 3 [4] 5 »

Posted by axs on Mar-28-2002 20:04:

Why would somebody limit themselves and say "I'm only ever going to use hardware" or "I'm only going to use software"? The more tools you have available, the more creative you can be! And that crap about frustration making your music better is a load of sh*t. Maybe that works for some people, but definitely not me!

Posted by inatrance on Mar-29-2002 05:57:

quote:
Originally posted by Bondor
how could you posibly forget Hammerheard 1.0 THE WORST APLICATION... EVER!

you know its the one with the subwoofer right on the screen!!!

THAT IS MY FAVORITE D00d LEAVE IT ALONE

Posted by dj_unsorted on Apr-01-2002 12:14:

hahahahaha.... i saw this while i was lookin through OLD forums... and i wanted to say that the worst programs i've used... or seen been used for makin muzik are...

1.) MTV music generator
2.) ANYTHING E-Jay
3.) Fruity somethin (that one that's just about exactly like MTV music generator)

and that's all... =oP

Posted by robstar on Apr-01-2002 18:28:

Don�t diss MTV music generator. It�s a very good program if u know how to use it.
I used to make music with it on my Psx. The bad thing with it is the soundquailty , other then that it�s pretty good!

Posted by DJ-Fuq on Apr-02-2002 12:30:

Its not fruityloops thats nearly the same as mtv music generator, its music 2000.

Posted by NIGHTERROR on Apr-02-2002 18:03:

i know a lot of prodcurer that was signed to a label using only software like Ft2 ,modplug ,buzz aned mastering it with Hardware.
Well most of they are still using software to make their track and are are great track .So.........there isn't anything to say else

See ya

Posted by robbyrob on Apr-03-2002 19:25:

there are alot of artsit that are making very very tight songs with software. i know that i have been in my life to 2 studios, and both of them had logic and reason.. that has to say something!

peace!

Posted by Verona^My on Apr-03-2002 20:10:

I've heard a few decent tunes made on a tracker. It's not the programs or the hardware, it's how you use them. I'm sure Britney Spear's music was produced using high end hardware, but the results aren't pretty. Great hardware does not = great music.

Posted by NIGHTERROR on Apr-03-2002 20:31:

Hehehehehehe Britney Spears suck............

Posted by robstar on Apr-04-2002 00:56:

quote:
Originally posted by NIGHTERROR
Hehehehehehe Britney Spears suck............

What does she suck?

CcK?

Agree with ya there... programs or hardware doesn�t make good music.

Posted by NIGHTERROR on Apr-08-2002 09:08:

[QUOTE]Originally posted by robstar

What does she suck?

CcK?

Hahahahahah .......Well i didn't say that but...........

Posted by NIGHTERROR on Apr-08-2002 09:09:

.....but yes offcourse !

Posted by extulas on Apr-09-2002 02:19:

quote:
Originally posted by Mr.Mystery

1. The computer doesn't do the work.
Software is not something you put on and say "do a track for me"...

2. Kraftwerk? You mean the band that did a tune called "ComputerLove"?

Bleh

Sorry, Been busy lately. Ok, Computers do do all the work for you. Why do you think people were once worried about computers takeing over their jobs? And yes Kraftwerk did do a song called that in 1981, And your point being....?

Posted by Peter Campbell on Apr-09-2002 07:36:

lol Extulas, we still going?

now if it were 100 years ago would you be one of those people worried
about electricity taking over candle light?

Posted by Verona^My on Apr-09-2002 07:38:

LMAO, so true. Having grown up on computer game music, I just dont care how a record is produced. I just care about the results.

Posted by Mr.Mystery on Apr-09-2002 07:58:

quote:

Ok, Computers do do all the work for you.

Explain this, please.
Does your computer write your intelligent comments by itself?
Does your computer go on even if you don't push the power button?
FYI - a computer is only as smart as the stuff installed in it and the person using it.
You could put on Reason and wait for a week and it STILL wouldn't had done a tune... it's not like hardware presets, u know...

quote:
And yes Kraftwerk did do a song called that in 1981, And your point being....?

Oh, nothing, just a thought...

I could give you a 10 track list and I'd bet ANYTHING you couldn't tell which tune is made with software and which is hardware... u up for it?

Posted by Peter Campbell on Apr-09-2002 08:09:

quote:
Originally posted by Mr.Mystery

I could give you a 10 track list and I'd bet ANYTHING you couldn't tell which tune is made with software and which is hardware... u up for it?

you could probly tell the difference between a softsynth and a hardware synth, but theres no way you could tell between a hardware secquencer and a software one.

my point is software goes hand and hand with hardware these days

Posted by extulas on Apr-11-2002 02:49:

quote:
Originally posted by Mr.Mystery

Explain this, please.
Does your computer write your intelligent comments by itself?
Does your computer go on even if you don't push the power button?
FYI - a computer is only as smart as the stuff installed in it and the person using it.
You could put on Reason and wait for a week and it STILL wouldn't had done a tune... it's not like hardware presets, u know...

Oh, nothing, just a thought...

I could give you a 10 track list and I'd bet ANYTHING you couldn't tell which tune is made with software and which is hardware... u up for it?

I use Red Hat and Debian, So no, It doesnt. But if your a sucker on a Windows machine, Then yes, I would be. You dont get what I mean? I mean: Computer software does the work for you. Everything. How can I explain?! Its one of those things you know, But cant explain. Maybe cause Im not use to clicking a button to make things work on my computer like some people. And yes, I would like a tracklist of 10 songs, And I will post on here what I think it is. So everyoen can see if I am wrong or right. Just a thought on what...? I dont get it...

Posted by Pjotr G on Apr-11-2002 08:25:

just a thought on feeding a sad sad discussion

Posted by Waxen on Apr-11-2002 08:45:

LOL.... MAGIX MUSIC MAKER !!!!!!!!!
*joke*

~S~

Posted by Sadmafioso on Apr-11-2002 17:04:

i go with fruity loops but hey dont flame me...im just more confortable with reason

Posted by D_G on Apr-11-2002 17:36:

OMFG! This ''discussion'' is STILL going on!
extulas - Just give up...i dont think any1 fulley agrees with u at all and u kno ur wrong anyway!

ner ner na ner ner

[Dan]

Posted by extulas on Apr-12-2002 23:57:

quote:
Originally posted by D_G
OMFG! This ''discussion'' is STILL going on!
extulas - Just give up...i dont think any1 fulley agrees with u at all and u kno ur wrong anyway!

ner ner na ner ner

[Dan]

I know Im right

Posted by Michael Russo on Apr-13-2002 00:45:

Personally, I'd rather use software over any hardware (even if money is not an issue).

Posted by extulas on Apr-13-2002 06:54:

quote:
Originally posted by Michael Russo
Personally, I'd rather use software over any hardware (even if money is not an issue).

How so? The only reason software is damn popular is because you can download it off "Warez" sites and channels. You cant download hardware! (Yet!)

Pages (5): « 1 2 3 [4] 5 »